Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
23,413
Reaction score
41,649
Points
2,430

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,”
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this.
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!
 

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,”
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this.
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!
More break ins.......

More dead thugs.......

Let's hope it's a trend.
 

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,”
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this.
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!
You break in to someone's house with the intent of robbing them and you lose all legal protections. The vet did the world a favor.
 
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,”
Hey mom.....what say you go to jail for raising a kid and not teaching him not to steal.

Or better yet, I'll find a local thug who can rob your house while you are in it.
 
This WWII vet wasn't so lucky.


1763163956234.webp





1763163991914.webp
 
This World War II paratrooper and his wife were murdered. She was raped.
He survived D-Day, but not Tulsa.


1763164886747.webp



"An Oklahoma man suspected in a brutal home invasion -- already facing a murder charge for allegedly killing an elderly woman -- could face additional charges after the death last week of her husband, a D-Day veteran.

Bob Strait, a 90-year-old Tulsa resident, died on Friday, and a medical examiner is determining his cause of death, News On 6 reports.

He was injured March 13 when, police say, Tyrone Woodfork, 20, entered the house and attacked, allegedly beating and sexually assaulted Strait's 85-year-old wife, Nancy Strait, who died two days later. The couple had been married for 65 years."



 
15th post
This article is almost unreadable. Do we have an actual article about the incident, the location etc? I could not find a link.
 

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe
Hmm, twenty eight bullets total in three bodies? Nothing wrong with making damn good and sure the threat is neutralized. These teenagers entered with guns. They deserved every bullet. The mom reminds me of the mother in Florida years ago when her boy tried to rob a store and got graveyard dead for his efforts. She said, "He was just going to rob you. So WHAT!"

It is the victim mentality unfortunately taught almost exclusively to blacks as children. Look up "The Talk". It reminds me of the Palestinians who also teach their children not to trust and to hate certain other people, Jews. Blacks are taught not to trust and to hate "******".
 

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!

14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,”
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this.
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!
If this happened more often crime rates would drop. But with states making it imposable for the good to use their Second Amendment don't hold your breath. Making a law to have mandatory IQ test to vote would improve life across the board.
 
Back
Top Bottom