Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #241
Do you also believe that what you believe is factual because you believe it?Having a motor drive is one thing, tuning it to exactly the rotation and speed of the earth is another. However this means nothing because if you do manage to get a clear image (which you won't) you still will have an image that explains nothing.
Seriously you clowns need to look up the definition of theoretical physics.
Besides I am far more interested in quantum entanglement for wireless atomically stored data computing anyway. It's real, is being developed as farting astrophysicist make up a new bs theory of the day
Then went are starting threads ranting about astrophysics?
When if ever you figure out what the word theoretical means you will know how stupid you are.
I won't hold my breath waiting
Let's see if we have this right. You simultaneously claim to understand the word "theoretical" AND claim that science holds every new theory as absolute fact. That's kind of odd.
Do you believe that there are any facts about the origin of the universe?
I believe there are observable phenomena that reveal a lot about the origin. Now, do YOU understand what "theoretical" means?
Would a spectrograph of the Earth from 50 billion light years away reveal that 70 percent of the planet is covered in water, or the gasses in the atmosphere, or the minerals dissolved in the 70 percent of water, or the iron core...………….
Once we get out 50 billion lightyears and look back the answer is known, not before...…………..
Bye the way there are no spectrograph images of planets outside our solar system
Keys please