Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

simple not true even the lefty press reported om the novel charge that had never been done before and on the fact that the charge was a misdemeanor that had expired.
Why post if you don’t know the facts surrounding the trial and conviction?
 
simple not true even the lefty press reported om the novel charge that had never been done before and on the fact that the charge was a misdemeanor that had expired.
Irrelevant babble.

He broke the law. The law was.on the books. A grand jury indicted him. Another convicted him.
 
I know man. I am being facetious.

These dumb fucks say he broke no laws and also want a preemptive pardon.
Colonel anus, what laws are you referring to that any democrat broke?
 
There needs to be reasonable grounds to open an investigation.
(h) Standards for authorizing compulsory legal process. [28 C.F.R. § 50.10(h)]

(1)
In all matters covered by this section, the official authorizing the compulsory legal process must take into account the principles set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(2) Except as provided in paragraph (h)(3) of this section, when the member of the news media is not the subject or target of an investigation and suspected of having committed an offense, the official authorizing the compulsory legal process must take into account the following considerations:

(i) In criminal matters, there must be reasonable grounds to believe, based on public information or information from non-news-media sources, that a crime has occurred, and that the information sought is essential to a successful investigation or prosecution. The compulsory legal process may not be used to obtain peripheral, nonessential, or speculative information.


Link? I see no mention of grand juries.
 
Link? I see no mention of grand juries.
You know that grand juries don't just magically appear and operate independently of the DoJ, right?

The DoJ would have to bring this to the grand jury and request the witnesses be called.
 
You know that grand juries don't just magically appear and operate independently of the DoJ, right?

The DoJ would have to bring this to the grand jury and request the witnesses be called.

Yep, and that's what Liz is facing. We agree!!
 
Yep, and that's what Liz is facing. We agree!!
Without a reasonable grounds to believe a crime has been committed, the DoJ will not bring anything related to this matter to a grand jury.
 
Without a reasonable grounds to believe a crime has been committed, the DoJ will not bring anything related to this matter to a grand jury.

And, if they do, then Liz will be standing in front of a grand jury. Timing is everything. ;)
 
I'm not the one who is unable to show their grand jury sources with links. ;)
That’s seriously fucked up fuckup.

Again, it’s your belief the grand juries do the investigation of criminal wrongdoing.

Right
 
yes, one who has committed no crime has no need for a pardon. accepting one means you are admitting you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned.
Not always. Pardons can be used in people who were unjustly convicted. It’s not an admission of guilt.
 
That’s seriously fucked up fuckup.

Again, it’s your belief the grand juries do the investigation of criminal wrongdoing.

Right

You can't show us anything about grand juries. :laughing0301:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom