Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't profess any defensive or offensive military strategy knowledge but I am not the one supporting a passive (leftist) response to an attack. You and too many others will not accept the fact that our current military leaders are woke-minded, ass-kissing Biden supporters. If Biden had the balls he would have stopped or at least tried to deter Putin BEFORE he invaded Ukraine. Now that the horse has left the barn he is helping Ukraine in drips and drabs which is only continuing the war. Why only 30 tanks, why not 130? FJBJust out of curiosity, what is your military background? Because very few (if any) members of the military who are acquainted with a scorched earth policy are in favor of it.
hahah THEY NEVER STOPPED! Iran Continues to Advance Nuclear ProgramIran restarted nuclear development after Trump pulled out of the agreement with Iran.
If Trump wasn’t willing to go to war, he should have tried diplomacy. Instead he ignored the problem and blamed everyone else. Just as I said.
They’re hoping that people don’t read this shitty article too closely.Reports released in 2018 by the German intelligence agencies in Hamburg, Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg, North Rhine-Westphalia, and Hesse obtained by the Jerusalem Post indicate Iran continues to seek weapons of mass destruction (Jerusalem Post, July 21, 2018).
thehill.com
Your non-answer to the question has me feeling you responded with Russia.So, when my Russian bro Sergei and I spiced a good lunch with talk about Crimea and Putin, the natural topics of the day, i asked about his experiences in Russia. We spoke about Russian leaders from Yeltsin to Putin, and by des-sert time he popped a question that took me totally by surprise. "would you rather be born in America or Russia?"
that's classified lol nah, neither, i always thought i should rule Chechnya, actuallyYour non-answer to the question has me feeling you responded with Russia.
At the time they were....they weren't later.They’re hoping that people don’t read this shitty article too closely.
The report doesn’t indicate that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, but rockets and chemicals.
You’ve been lied to again.
Trump’s own administration had to say they were in compliance, because they were.
Trump admin: Iran in compliance, but nuclear deal under review
The State Department informed Congress Tuesday that Iran is in compliance with the nuclear deal and that the United States will continue its ease of sanctions under the agreement.President Trump ha…
This is another reason Donald Trump is so hated by BOTH PARTIES. When Bolton and the war hawks were pressuring President Trump to attack Iran, he analyzed what happened and said NO.
Iran has a cap of 130 tons of heavy water. They hit 130.1.At the time they were....they weren't later.
- Iran had exceeded agreed-upon limits on its heavy water stocks.
- Iran had exceeded agreed-upon limits on its centrifuge numbers.
- Iran had imposed limits on IAEA access to nuclear facilities.
- Problems have arisen in the implementation of Section T, in which Iran commits not to engage in specific activities that could contribute to the development of a nuclear weapon
Moreover, it was just a horrible deal....Obama and Xiden couldn't even get the their own party to back it, hence why they never attempted to get it ratified
hahaha now you are arguing they didn't violate it, that bad.Iran has a cap of 130 tons of heavy water. They hit 130.1.
A few days later they sent the heavy water out of country to Oman and the IAEA certified it.
Iran was limited to “roughly” 10 centrifuges for research purposes. They had 16. The violation is a couple of cent figures?
This is clearly excuse making and we are FAR worse off without the deal because now there is no cap on centrifuges or heavy water.
Your statement was extremely misleading. These are tiny issues which were identified and rectified because we have the agreement.hahaha now you are arguing they didn't violate it, that bad.
thanks
No your statement was...you first claimed they were in compliance....now, after the facts have come out, you change your tune, and it's well the violations weren't that badYour statement was extremely misleading. These are tiny issues which were identified and rectified because we have the agreement.
And no, I don’t think disagreeing what the word roughly means is a violation.
And the current situation is better? You’re a moron if you think so.
The details of the supposed violations make it a lot harder to call them violations. These are details you don’t want to talk about, or rather you’re just ignorant of.No your statement was...you first claimed they were in compliance....now, after the facts have come out, you change your tune, and it's well the violations weren't that bad
they are violations if they aren't in complaince....they clearly, and you showed, were above what was allowed. These are the details we can discuss...The details of the supposed violations make it a lot harder to call them violations. These are details you don’t want to talk about, or rather you’re just ignorant of.
Those violations pale in comparison to the mess that Trump made by pulling out.
He is saying nukes will be next, not that we should be shooting them,Calling for nuclear attacks as a follow up to tank attacks? That's not leadership, that's insanity.
Ever think that the reason no other world leader is echoing his "solution" is because they know it's a no win situation?
And, the only reason Trump think's it's "easy" is because he has no clue.
Aiming a shotgun and shooting a fly on your wall at 10 ft. away is easy, and yes, it will take care of the annoying fly, but it will also do major damage to your house.
Calling for nukes to follow tanks in the Ukraine war is much like using a shotgun to kill a fly on your wall.
but that an escalation like this by the US sending tanks could cause it!The real issue is you are stupid enough to think the ever stoppedIran restarted nuclear development after Trump pulled out of the agreement with Iran.
If Trump wasn’t willing to go to war, he should have tried diplomacy. Instead he ignored the problem and blamed everyone else. Just as I said.
It's called being Putin's toady. Something everyone has known about Trump for a very long time.President Trump slams escalation in Ukraine - calls for war to end
No other world leader is calling for this
it's called LEADERSHIP
