Lindsey Halligan illegally appointed

[Robert W]

Now come back and eat crow, like a good little sheep.

It is your crow. Sure, you want it eaten?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is your crow. Sure, you want it eaten?

Uh oh, troll is having a sad

 

[Robert W]

Trump is so consumed with image over substance that he STILL hasn't figured out that you don't hire someone for important matters based on how they'll look on teevee.

But then again, he's a child. How would he know.

When did Trump meet with you to tell you that?

 

[Robert W]

Uh oh, troll is having a sad

Your troll refuses to stick to what he was whining about.

 

[berg80]

Judge Currie was appointed to hear the Comey and James challenges to Halligan’s appointment because of a conflict of interest that the federal judges in the district had. One of the core issues in the challenge to Halligan’s appointment was whether the attorney general or the judges in that district have the power to appoint interim U.S. attorneys after an initial 120-day appointment has expired.

The Trump administration argued – contrary to settled law and past practice – that the attorney general could appoint consecutive interim U.S. attorneys to their own 120-day terms indefinitely. After analyzing the statute on U.S. attorney vacancies, Currie rejected that argument, using identical language in both rulings:

In sum, the text, structure, and history of section 546 point to one conclusion: the Attorney General’s authority to appoint an interim U.S. Attorney lasts for a total of 120 days from the date she first invokes section 546 after the departure of a Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney. If the position remains vacant at the end of the 120-day period, the exclusive authority to make further interim appointments under the statute shifts to the district court, where it remains until the President’s nominee is confirmed by the Senate.

Comey and James Cases Dismissed Over Halligan’s Invalid Appointment

A federal judge has ruled that former insurance lawyer Lindsey Halligan was...

talkingpointsmemo.com

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your troll refuses to stick to what he was whining about.

Oh no!

Rough day, huh?

 

[Robert W]

MAGA has no shame. They can’t be embarrassed.

Give it your best shot to shame us. We tried to get you shamed over your Shut down.

 

[Marener]

Give it your best shot to shame us. We tried to get you shamed over your Shut down.

Illegally appointing Halligan just to prosecute a pathetically weak case because Trump hates Comey is embarrassing.

 

[Robert W]

Judge Currie was appointed to hear the Comey and James challenges to Halligan’s appointment because of a conflict of interest that the federal judges in the district had. One of the core issues in the challenge to Halligan’s appointment was whether the attorney general or the judges in that district have the power to appoint interim U.S. attorneys after an initial 120-day appointment has expired.

The Trump administration argued – contrary to settled law and past practice – that the attorney general could appoint consecutive interim U.S. attorneys to their own 120-day terms indefinitely. After analyzing the statute on U.S. attorney vacancies, Currie rejected that argument, using identical language in both rulings:

In sum, the text, structure, and history of section 546 point to one conclusion: the Attorney General’s authority to appoint an interim U.S. Attorney lasts for a total of 120 days from the date she first invokes section 546 after the departure of a Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney. If the position remains vacant at the end of the 120-day period, the exclusive authority to make further interim appointments under the statute shifts to the district court, where it remains until the President’s nominee is confirmed by the Senate.

Comey and James Cases Dismissed Over Halligan’s Invalid Appointment

A federal judge has ruled that former insurance lawyer Lindsey Halligan was...

talkingpointsmemo.com

These sorts of Biden Judges findings are not final. We have a Supreme Court for that reason.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

These sorts of Biden Judges findings are not final. We have a Supreme Court for that reason.

The illegal appointment of Halligan is not going to be appealed to the SCOTUS.

 

[Robert W]

Illegally appointing Halligan just to prosecute a pathetically weak case because Trump hates Comey is embarrassing.

Comey hates Trump so does

The illegal appointment of Halligan is not going to be appealed to the SCOTUS.

Sure it will.

 

[Robert W]

Illegally appointing Halligan just to prosecute a pathetically weak case because Trump hates Comey is embarrassing.

Comey and Leticia James hate Trump and now we hear from the Supreme Court.

 

[22lcidw]

These sorts of Biden Judges findings are not final. We have a Supreme Court for that reason.

We know now how much the Progressiveswere screaming and crying when Trump appointed three to the court. Of course, they are not Progressive like zealots like they have to the other side and like the Republicans need for a couple of decades at least. The lower court judges need some skin in the game. And they are let off lightly.

 

[Marener]

Comey hates Trump so does

Who cares? Trump violated the constitution because of his hatred. Comey didn’t.

 

[berg80]

Comey and Leticia James hate Trump and now we hear from the Supreme Court.

It appears the statute of limitations has expired in Comey's case. As for James, I wonder if His Orangeness is really up for more humiliation.

 

[Concerned American]

Who cares? Trump violated the constitution because of his hatred. Comey didn’t.

Guess you don't remember 86 47 eh? STFU, you're hypocritical partisan moron. Nothing screams hatred more than assassinations and assassination attempts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Guess you don't remember 86 47 eh? STFU, you're hypocritical partisan moron. Nothing screams hatred more than assassinations and assassination attempts.

I also remember "86 eggs" from the restaurant.

Nobody shot the eggs.

 

[Marener]

Guess you don't remember 86 47 eh? STFU, you're hypocritical partisan moron. Nothing screams hatred more than assassinations and assassination attempts.

Guess you don’t remember that Comey was never charged for it?

Because it’s got nothing to do with assassination and is protected speech.

 

[Concerned American]

Guess you don’t remember that Comey was never charged for it?

So you're saying you have to be charged with hatred for a hateful action to have happened? Keep digging, you sound stupider with each post. Then you double down with trying to say these democrat assassinations and assassination attempts aren't hateful actions. STFU, you're an idiot.

 

[Marener]

So you're saying you have to be charged with hatred for a hateful action to have happened? Keep digging, you sound stupider with each post. Then you double down with trying to say these democrat assassinations and assassination attempts aren't hateful actions. STFU, you're an idiot.

Comey had every right to say it.

Trump violated the constitution.

There’s a difference between your hurt feelings and using government to deprive citizens of rights.