Lindell Goes to the SCOTUS

[Lastamender]

Seriously man, trust me. Yes, the election was stolen, but chasing an impossible narrative does not get you where you need to be.

The spreadsheet he put out was technically impossible, and obviously fabricated. The easiest way to tell is to analyze the MAC ID's. If it was real data, there would be telltales- the first 3 octets of a MAC ID are the OUI. That is the manufacturer's ID. There were no OUI's that correspond to any manufacturer, and this is very easy to validate with any online MAC ID lookup tool.

Also if they were real, there would be a lot of duplicates in the first 3 octets, because every DELL (for example) network adapter uses the same OUI. There were no duplicates.

The person who used a random number generator to create the list made a mistake. He left out the number FF. That is 255 in hex. 255 is a mask in IP addressing, so no IP address uses 255. But in MAC addressing, 255 (FF) is perfectly valid and is used in MAC ID's all the time. There are no FF's in the MAC ID's.

The scrolling "PCAPS" were just the Pennsylvania voter registration database in HEX. All Internet packets begin with a common set of numbers that identify basics like it's an IP data packet, etc. You can search for a string and identify the start of a packet, and then you can work backwards from there to break them out one by one.

What I did was copy some of the numbers into a hex editor, and just read the ASCII. Anything in plain test is readable. I also searched for beginning strings of TCP/IP packets, and there are none. So it's not network traffic.

I could go on and on about the people he has around him, the guy that produced the faked data used the same scam on Joe Arpaio and also the Pentagon. His name is Dennis Montgomery. A real slimeball.

Thanks for the information.

 

[konradv]

Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.

What’s he talking about? He has no stsnding and SCOTUS already told him that. No matter how new and compelling the “evidence” he has is, he still lacks standing.

 

[Slade3200]

Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.

So you don’t know what it is but you want MSM to cover it… that’s funny

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Mike Lindell's and Kari Lake's 'explosive' new evidence of election skullduggery goes pffft

After nearly a week of Mike Lindell hype, Kari Lake and Mark Finchem file their 'explosive' appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

www.azcentral.com

 

[Lastamender]

The filing includes “new allegations,” some of which were previously mentioned in Kari Lake’s lawsuit to overturn the stolen election, including:

• First, Maricopa did not conduct the required L&A testing, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.
• Second, Maricopa did not use certified software, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.
• Third, Maricopa used software that made all passwords needed to control Maricopa elections available to anyone with physical or remote access, which supports petitioners’ allegations and evidence that past elections were manipulated.

• Fourth, altering election software without the Arizona Secretary of State’s approval is criminal act under Arizona law, A.R.S. §§16-449(A), 16- 452(C), 16-1009, 16-1004(B), 16-1010, thereby evaporating presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).

• Fifth, Maricopa’s officials misrepresented their compliance with Arizona election law (e.g., L&A testing, certified software), which negates any presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).
• Sixth, Maricopa officials abdicated control over the complex election systems to embedded private Dominion employees who lack any presumption of regularity under Arizona law. See note 4, infra.

JUST IN: Kari Lake and Mark Finchem Take Lawsuit to Ban Voting Machines to The US Supreme Court with New Allegations of Illegal Machine Certification | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Kari Lake and Mark Finchem appealed their lawsuit to ban the use of electronic voting machines to the United States Supreme Court on Thursday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[dudmuck]

Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.

 

[Lastamender]

End times? Then we will never know. You will remain as clueless as you were before the end.