That's a complete lie. The KKK was started by The Democrat
Party as a paramilitary terrorist wing to
Intimidate Black Americans and Conservative Voters.
Wrong again Mytho. The Klan was started by six twentysomething ex-Confederate soldiers who were bored in a small town and simply started a silly klub with no purpose. That's exactly WHY it has all those silly K-alliterations and collegiate hazing rituals. A goof. Shortly after it was taken over by 'night rider' elements that had existed since at least the 18th century, before there were any political parties let alone a United States.
After that fizzled out in a few years it was re-founded in 1915 by an ex-Methodist minister, salesman and huckster who was out to make money selling memberships by making the Klan that was pictured in the then-current film "Birth of a Nation". His motive was capitalism.
Specifically the founders were (1865, in alpha order)
Maj. James Crowe, Calvin Jones, Capt. John B. Kennedy, Capt. John Lester, Frank O. McCord and Richard Reed, specifically at 205 West Madison Street in Pulaski Tennessee, on Christmas Day. NONE of them had any known political affiliations, NOR did political parties
exist in that time and place anyway even if they were old enough to vote. The second (1915) was
William Joseph Simmons and a gaggle of a lynch mob from the recent lynching of Leo Frank, a Jewish businessman who had been accused of a murder, specifically at midnight on Thanksgiving Day at Stone Mountain outside Atlanta. Again-- Simmons had no known political affiliations or activities.
BOTH of these foundings pointedly described themselves as non-political.
Btw officially the first Klan was dissolved in January of 1869, even if that order was ignored. The second Klan officially ended April 23 1944 when FDR's IRS slapped it with a 2/3 of a million dollar back-tax bill and the Governor of Georgia Ellis Arnall revoke its charter. Again, ad hoc groups continued to play dress-up.
Those are the facts. Just try to prove any of them wrong. After that you can try to explain Ed Jackson, Rice Means, Owen Brewster, George Mason, Clarence Morley, D.C. Stephenson, Ben Paulen and even Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover.
The KKK was Democrats in the far past. They are all republicans today. Their leader is donald trump.
They're not "all Republicans" any more than they were ever "all Democrats". For one thing not everybody has a political party. For another, their purpose is a self-infatuated moral crusade, not politics. This may be a political message board but politics and binary political parties simply do not, and can, not, pigeonhole everything that happens.
This is a description from the early, original Klan of the South:
Lifting the Klan mask revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. --- Elaine Frantz Parsons, Ku Klux: "The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction" (UNC Press) p. 816
"Antiblack vigilante groups", as the Klan became by infiltration, were already rampant in the former Confederacy immediately after the War. Dozens of them sprang up, locally and regionally, expressing the same oppression against freed slaves in countless individual and spontaneous incidents as well.
Another component of these, separate from racism and slavery, was the element during the War called "Home Guards", who took no sides in, and wanted no part of, the War, and served as militants and snipers to ward off invasion from any side. In a civil war a beseiged town can see its fate controlled by different sides over and over and over. This is why some of these groups fought off occupying Union troops and "carpetbaggers".
"Rapists" is an interesting conclusion above, in that we have an orange President all too willing to be specific with what he calls "Mexicans", yet trips all over himself with fear of being specific about "Klan" and "Nazis" and "fascists". I guess it's a term that's employed when it serves Numero Uno and shunned when it doesn't What a surprise that is.