Like Trump Problems For RFK Jr When He Opens His Mouth

[EMH]

And all the poor polar bears are dead...coastal cities are under water...cats and dogs living together...complete armageddon.

This correctly sums up what we, the American taxpayers, have received for $20 trillion dollars over 35 years of the Co2 fraud....

 

[EMH]

This is not a conspiracy theory thread.

The court spoke, your side did not appeal...

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica increasing
Co2 lagged, did not lead, (miniscule) temp increases

Theory rejected....

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Your beaked birdbrain parrots court certified lies, imbecile...

 

[Delldude]

Yes, some of us are not parasites. We pay for news.

I'm sure,during all the Trump Russia allegations, you were a beacon of hope for the mentally afflicted left.

 

[easyt65]

Then comes along AOC, the bartender, and says 'Hold my Beer' before declaring Global Warming is caused by COW FARTS!















Some redneck in Arkansas created a device that cleans cow farts, transforming CO2 into O2. It's called a CATTLE-ITIC CONVERTER.



.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

The court spoke, your side did not appeal...

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica increasing
Co2 lagged, did not lead, (miniscule) temp increases

Theory rejected....

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Your beaked birdbrain parrots court certified lies, imbecile...

You have a hard on for Al Gore?

Cool. I'm open minded

 

[Dante Reawakened]

The court spoke, your side did not appeal...

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica increasing
Co2 lagged, did not lead, (miniscule) temp increases

Theory rejected....

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Your beaked birdbrain parrots court certified lies, imbecile...

ABC News: Of course your source misrepresents most everything.


One day before Friday's announcement that he was a co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, a British High Court judge ruled that Gore's global warming film, "An Inconvenient Truth," while "broadly accurate," contained nine significant errors.

The ruling came on a challenge from a UK school official who did not want to show the film to students. High Court Judge Michael Burton said that the film is "substantially founded upon scientific research and fact" but that the errors were made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

Burton found that screening the film in British secondary schools violated laws barring the promotion of partisan political views in the classroom. But he allowed the film to be shown on the condition that it is accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's "one-sided" views, saying that the film's "apocalyptic vision" was not an impartial analysis of climate change.

The claim was originally filed by truck driver Stewart Dimmock, whose two children have not yet seen the film.

An Inconvenient Verdict for Al Gore

Win some, lose some? U.K. court cites errors in "An Inconvenient Truth."

abcnews.go.com

Kalee Kreider said that Gore was "deeply gratified that the court upheld the fundamental thesis of the film" and "affirmed it as a valid educational tool."

As for the errors, Kreider said, "Of the thousands of facts, the judge seemingly only took issue with a handful. We've got peer review studies that back up those facts. There were a couple of cases where we feel the film wasn't quoted accurately."

 

[EMH]

ABC News: Of course your source misrepresents most everything.


One day before Friday's announcement that he was a co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, a British High Court judge ruled that Gore's global warming film, "An Inconvenient Truth," while "broadly accurate," contained nine significant errors.

The ruling came on a challenge from a UK school official who did not want to show the film to students. High Court Judge Michael Burton said that the film is "substantially founded upon scientific research and fact" but that the errors were made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

Burton found that screening the film in British secondary schools violated laws barring the promotion of partisan political views in the classroom. But he allowed the film to be shown on the condition that it is accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's "one-sided" views, saying that the film's "apocalyptic vision" was not an impartial analysis of climate change.

The claim was originally filed by truck driver Stewart Dimmock, whose two children have not yet seen the film.

An Inconvenient Verdict for Al Gore

Win some, lose some? U.K. court cites errors in "An Inconvenient Truth."

abcnews.go.com

Kalee Kreider said that Gore was "deeply gratified that the court upheld the fundamental thesis of the film" and "affirmed it as a valid educational tool."

As for the errors, Kreider said, "Of the thousands of facts, the judge seemingly only took issue with a handful. We've got peer review studies that back up those facts. There were a couple of cases where we feel the film wasn't quoted accurately."

LOL!!

That was the media spin because they were TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL...

 

[Dante Reawakened]

LOL!!

That was the media spin because they were TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL...

Yet another conspiracy!

 

[badger2]

In 2016, a GOP candidate came down an escalator and threw the GOP primaries into chaos. ...

"It is true that about 15 percent of Democrats say they support Kennedy, according to the RealClearPolitics average of polls, as opposed to 62 percent who favor Biden. And I get it: Many Democrats wish there were a younger alternative to the 80-year-old Biden; and Kennedy, 69, has that magical name. The problem comes when Kennedy opens his mouth — and reveals that he lives in a make-believe world of paranoid conspiracy theories."

... I keep seeing people pushing poor Bobby's candidacy. People who do not agree with him on issues, or back him seriously out of ideological kinship. It's all about creating chaos, as with a former chaos candidate we saw emerge in the 2016 GOP primaries. But I doubt the Democratic primaries would evolve into chaos as the GOP ones did in 2016. The Democrats did have an angry old man jump in, one Bernie Sanders. But Bernie never got Democrats on his side. Bernie was one who thought he was too good t be a Democrat, until he needed to be one. But he was soundly rejected ...

2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Back to Bobby: He has so little support. Facts Matter.

"If Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s name were Robert F. Smith Jr., he would be written off as an anti-vaccine nutjob. His pedigree is enough to make some Democrats give his presidential campaign a look — and they will find that he is indeed an anti-vaccine nutjob and that he often sounds a lot like a MAGA Republican."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/06/19/robert-kennedy-jr-campaign-antivaxx-conspiracy/

Yes, some of us are not parasites. We pay for news.

RFK Jr.'s challenge to Hotez to debate him on Rogan's show, and Musk knows that Kennedy knows what the words actually mean when they debate science.

 

[Delldude]

Yet another conspiracy!

Russia, Russia, Russia

 

[Dante Reawakened]

yep

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Russia, Russia, Russia

Indicted Indicted Indicted

Guilty Guilty Guilty

 

[surada]

The whole thing was BS. Covid 19, defined as that which initially hit the US in Feb 2020, was a two month normal flu cycle and was completely gone by May of 2020.

It killed max 40k in America, max.

Every other noise on the subject is complete deliberate fraud by the Zionist Fascists who wanted to use absentee ballot fraud to get rid of Trump...

Most of these Christian Zionists love crackpot conspiracy theories.

Christian nationalists, biblical literalists prone to believe in conspiracies

Christian Nationalists and biblical literalists are more like to believe conspiracy theories The researchers noted that previous research into the topic had shown that Christians were “especially susceptible” to conspiracy theories in the United States but also wrote that scientists had yet to...

politicalhotwire.com

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Who said the Arctic would be ice free?

One of your straw men?

Your climate prophet Greta Thunderturd said we'd all be dead now

Stfu

 

[OldFlame]

I love how the lefties are circling the wagons around the most prolific D family in history, funny stuff!

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Your climate prophet Greta Thunderturd said we'd all be dead now

Stfu

Huh?

You believe most people pay attention to that kid?



But you do. It's sorta creepy you fantasizing over that little girl. Just like your creepy, nasty, disgusting degenerate of a hero

Trump makes inappropriate remarks about young girl – video

Donald Trump can be heard making inappropriate remarks to a young girl in a video from a 1992 Entertainment Tonight Christmas special, given to CBS News

www.theguardian.com

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Indicted Indicted Indicted

Guilty Guilty Guilty

yep