Like if Putin were to announce war crime prevention.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,262
Reaction score
27,119
Points
2,820
Don says he is working on a 'comprehensive' crime bill. Congressional Repubs don't know what the hell he's referring to.

Republicans scratch their heads over Trump’s ‘comprehensive’ crime bill​

President Donald Trump is envisioning a sweeping crime bill and billions of dollars in new funding for the nation’s capital. His Republican allies in Congress are largely in the dark on the details.

Multiple times this month, Trump has said he’s working on crime legislation with GOP congressional leaders. His latest comment came early Wednesday morning when he posted on Truth Social that he is working with Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other Republican lawmakers on a “Comprehensive Crime Bill” with “more to follow.”

There have been some early conversations between White House officials and House GOP leadership aides about legislation related to Trump’s public-safety crackdown in Washington as well as certain other crime provisions.

But Trump’s latest comments have puzzled Republicans, including members of leadership and key congressional committees, who don’t know what “comprehensive” measure the president is talking about, according to seven Republicans granted anonymity to speak candidly.


It's ironic for a guy who is hell bound to illegally send the military in to a few blue state cities to "fight crime" ;), even though the crime rates are higher in a few red state cities, that he himself is a convicted criminal. If only he had concerned himself with crimes before he committed them.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
 
Last edited:
Don says he is working on a 'comprehensive' crime bill. House Repubs don't know what the hell he's referring to.

Republicans scratch their heads over Trump’s ‘comprehensive’ crime bill​

President Donald Trump is envisioning a sweeping crime bill and billions of dollars in new funding for the nation’s capital. His Republican allies in Congress are largely in the dark on the details.

Multiple times this month, Trump has said he’s working on crime legislation with GOP congressional leaders. His latest comment came early Wednesday morning when he posted on Truth Social that he is working with Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other Republican lawmakers on a “Comprehensive Crime Bill” with “more to follow.”

There have been some early conversations between White House officials and House GOP leadership aides about legislation related to Trump’s public-safety crackdown in Washington as well as certain other crime provisions.

But Trump’s latest comments have puzzled Republicans, including members of leadership and key congressional committees, who don’t know what “comprehensive” measure the president is talking about, according to seven Republicans granted anonymity to speak candidly.


It's ironic for a guy who is hell bound to illegally send the military in to a few blue state cities to "fight crime" ;), even though the crime rates are higher in a few red state cities, that he himself is a convicted criminal. If only he had concerned himself with crimes before he committed them.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
Probably fair to predict that it will be the most aggressive, authortarian, far-reaching power grab we've ever seen.

Hopefully we won't be required to genuflect before one of his massive scowling portrait banners.

I guess we'll see.
 
Don says he is working on a 'comprehensive' crime bill. House Repubs don't know what the hell he's referring to.

Republicans scratch their heads over Trump’s ‘comprehensive’ crime bill​

President Donald Trump is envisioning a sweeping crime bill and billions of dollars in new funding for the nation’s capital. His Republican allies in Congress are largely in the dark on the details.

Multiple times this month, Trump has said he’s working on crime legislation with GOP congressional leaders. His latest comment came early Wednesday morning when he posted on Truth Social that he is working with Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other Republican lawmakers on a “Comprehensive Crime Bill” with “more to follow.”

There have been some early conversations between White House officials and House GOP leadership aides about legislation related to Trump’s public-safety crackdown in Washington as well as certain other crime provisions.

But Trump’s latest comments have puzzled Republicans, including members of leadership and key congressional committees, who don’t know what “comprehensive” measure the president is talking about, according to seven Republicans granted anonymity to speak candidly.


It's ironic for a guy who is hell bound to illegally send the military in to a few blue state cities to "fight crime" ;), even though the crime rates are higher in a few red state cities, that he himself is a convicted criminal. If only he had concerned himself with crimes before he committed them.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
Bill Clinton
[th]
Appointed by​
[/th]​
Next
 
DC went 12 days without a murder while carjackings were reduced by 87% under Trump's efforts. Why do liberals want more crime, death, and destruction?

Is this just a hissy fit to avoid taking responsibility for decade after decade of failed liberal policies?
 
Probably fair to predict that it will be the most aggressive, authortarian, far-reaching power grab we've ever seen.

Hopefully we won't be required to genuflect before one of his massive scowling portrait banners.

I guess we'll see.
Who knows, perhaps he'll elevate the punishment for throwing food at law enforcement officials to a felony. I'm sure it would make the public feel safer.

Feds charge ‘Subway’ sandwich tosser with misdemeanor after grand jury balks at felony indictment​

Prosecutors have charged the man accused of throwing a “Subway” sandwich at a federal officer on a Washington, D.C., street with just misdemeanor assault after failing to convince a grand jury to indict him on a felony assault charge, court records show.

Former Department of Justice employee Sean Charles Dunn is accused of tossing the sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer on Aug. 10 in D.C.’s U Street nightlife area.

 
Why do liberals want more crime, death, and destruction?
They don't. Why did trump send troops to a city with a lower murder rate than cities in states run by Repubs? A fact you would be aware of had you watched Gov. Pritzker's speech.

So in case there was any doubt as to the motivation behind Trump's military occupations, take note: 13 of the top 20 cities in homicide rate have Republican governors. None of these cities is Chicago.

Eight of the top 10 states with the highest homicide rates are led by Republicans. None of those states is Illinois.

Memphis, Tennessee; Hattiesburg, Mississippi have higher crime rates than Chicago, and yet Donald Trump is sending troops here and not there? Ask yourself why.

If Donald Trump was actually serious about fighting crime in cities like Chicago, he, along with his congressional Republicans, would not be cutting over $800 million in public safety and crime prevention grants nationally,
including cutting $158 million in funding to Illinois for violence prevention programs that deploy trained outreach workers to deescalate conflict on our streets. Cutting $71 million in law enforcement grants to Illinois, direct money for police departments through programs like Project Safe Neighborhoods, the state and local Antiterrorism Training Program, and the Rural Violent Crime Reduction Initiative, cutting $137 million in child protection measures in Illinois that protect our kids against abuse and neglect.

Trump is defunding the police.

 
They don't. Why did trump send troops to a city with a lower murder rate than cities in states run by Repubs? A fact you would be aware of had you watched Gov. Pritzker's speech.
....

Because DC is the only federal city.

'
You ask that question like it's a gotcha, but it is only a gotcha if you are completely ignorant on the issue.


I think you knew it was a retarded question.

I think you were trolling for RETARDS, because you know that today, you can only hope to recruit retarded people to the lefty movement.
 
Because DC is the only federal city.
LA isn't. Chicago isn't. He sent troops to one. He said he wants to send troops to the other. Why isn't he talking about sending troops to Memphis, Tennessee or Hattiesburg, Mississippi?

National Guard troops deployed in D.C. add sanitation, landscaping duties​


Maybe what he really wants is the parks to look better.
 
Perhaps we will now be paying national guardsmen full police salaries, as it should be.
 
Perhaps we will now be paying national guardsmen full police salaries, as it should be.
One of the forgotten elements of the use of NG troops is these folks have lives and presumably full time jobs. Lives and jobs they've been pulled away from to spread mulch in DC.
 
LA isn't. Chicago isn't. He sent troops to one. He said he wants to send troops to the other. Why isn't he talking about sending troops to Memphis, Tennessee or Hattiesburg, Mississippi?

National Guard troops deployed in D.C. add sanitation, landscaping duties​


Maybe what he really wants is the parks to look better.


Who knows? Who cares? If the result is hundreds of saved American lives and better cities.
 
Who knows? Who cares? If the result is hundreds of saved American lives and better cities.
I think it's safe to say your answer covers a lot of ground when it comes to the regime. The attitude trumples have adopted is, "I don't care what trump does, including breaking the law, if he......to borrow a phrase......makes the trains run on time." Ben Franklin had something to say about that.

“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
 
I think it's safe to say your answer covers a lot of ground when it comes to the regime. The attitude trumples have adopted is, "I don't care what trump does, including breaking the law, if he......to borrow a phrase......makes the trains run on time." Ben Franklin had something to say about that.

“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”


You were asking me why one city and not another.

That has nothing to do with "breaking laws" or "giving up liberty".


I'm sure there is a reason that one city was chosen as opposed to another. I don't know it or care.

Neither do you. Even if you were told it, adn you realized that it was a good reason, you would still be here spamming your RESIST.


Sooo, yeah. **** OFF LIBTARD ASSHOLE.
 
I'm sure there is a reason that one city was chosen as opposed to another. I don't know it or care.
I think there was. Cuz it isn't like a growing crime rate in DC was becoming a national embarrassment since the crime rate was declining, according to the DoJ. Dotard was upset about what happened to Big Balls and used it as a pretense to do what he reflexively always wants to do. Push the boundaries of his authority.

I just find his supposed concern with crime committed by others, but not himself, somewhat hypocritical.
 
You were asking me why one city and not another.

That has nothing to do with "breaking laws" or "giving up liberty".


I'm sure there is a reason that one city was chosen as opposed to another. I don't know it or care.

Neither do you. Even if you were told it, adn you realized that it was a good reason, you would still be here spamming your RESIST.


Sooo, yeah. **** OFF LIBTARD ASSHOLE.
The Trump administration is making plans for an immigration crackdown in Chicago that would involve 200 homeland security officials and the use of a naval base outside the city as a staging area, according to internal documents obtained by The New York Times.

The request to use a naval station in Illinois, drafted in recent days by the Homeland Security Department, suggests that the Trump administration is planning a sustained operation, potentially for the month of September. The request, should it be granted by the Defense Department, would be a notable example of the nation’s military resources being used for civilian law enforcement by an administration that has increasingly blurred the line between them.


I'm not effing off. I'm going to keep throwing trump's shit in your face cuz after all.........it's your shit too.
 
15th post
1756479285397.webp
 
I think there was. Cuz it isn't like a growing crime rate in DC was becoming a national embarrassment since the crime rate was declining, according to the DoJ. Dotard was upset about what happened to Big Balls and used it as a pretense to do what he reflexively always wants to do. Push the boundaries of his authority.

Nothing wrong with being upset by violent crime being done to an innocent man.

it is fucked in the head of you to imply that there is.





I just find his supposed concern with crime committed by others, but not himself, somewhat hypocritical.

It is you being a bad person, pretending that there is any crediblity to the lawfare actions of your side.


You are a piece of shit person.
 
Probably fair to predict that it will be the most aggressive, authortarian, far-reaching power grab we've ever seen.

Hopefully we won't be required to genuflect before one of his massive scowling portrait banners.

I guess we'll see.
You genuflected before massive BLM/Floyd public murals. We were all required to bless that shit by the media and the Democrats as they lifted a useless thug to sainthood.
 
The Brit "Guardian" lectures us on using American terms in context? I don't think so. It isn't rape but you can call it that? Where was this judge when Clinton was accused?
 
Back
Top Bottom