Life Without Parole

Then you're against the death penalty?
No

The death penalty is the only method to insure that a convicted murderer never kills again
 
Last edited:
No

The death penalty is the only method to insure that a convicted murder never kills again
Either you consider execution of innocent people acceptable, or you believe that the court system is infallible. Which is it?
 
Either you consider execution of innocent people acceptable, or you believe that the court system is infallible. Which is it?
The courts are not perfect

So my honest answer is to concede that an innocent criminal could be executed for a crime that some other criminal actually did

But that rarely happens
 
The courts are not perfect

So my honest answer is to concede that an innocent criminal could be executed for a crime that some other criminal actually did

But that rarely happens
Give me a number. How many innocent people are you willing to kill to sate your bloodlust?
 
Give me a number. How many innocent people are you willing to kill to sate your bloodlust?
Why, so that you can sit on your high horse and mumble that one is too many?
 
Why, so that you can sit on your high horse and mumble that one is too many?
More deflection, more tap-dancing.

Look, I get it: you are not willing to admit-even to yourself-that you're a hypocrite.
 
More deflection, more tap-dancing.

Look, I get it: you are not willing to admit-even to yourself-that you're a hypocrite.
I didnt tap dance in post #46

The courts are not perfect

my honest answer is to concede that an innocent criminal could be executed for a crime that some other criminal actually did

But that rarely happens

Which obviously is too honest for you to deal with
 
Either you consider execution of innocent people acceptable, or you believe that the court system is infallible. Which is it?

What the difference between locking an innocent person away for their life and killing them after 20 years?

So just scrap incarceration entirely?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom