California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,059
- 0
- Banned
- #41
<snicker>
Cali-G IS that stupid. Wow.
So, you can't provide actual evidence - other than some photographs which may, or may not, be legitimate. Thought not.
Just checking - exactly how are we defining the word 'stupid' now? Because I'm kind of thinking that providing 'evidence' that isn't verifiable is not actually providing 'evidence' at all, is it? Until you can accredit the images they are, in fact, just images.... they prove nothing other than your ability to post pictures.
Oh...so you are one of THOSE people? Let me guess? A birther too? A Truther? One of those people who still believes we never landed on the moon because photgraphs can be doctored?![]()
Try not to be an idiot all day every day. Actually, I have stated on this forum that I believe Obama is legitimately the President, born in the US, etc.
It's not my fault you use evidence that you cannot source. That is your own stupidity. Now, tell me where and when each of those photos was taken otherwise I have no reason to believe they are real.
Such is the burden - you provided the evidence.... you back it up.
My point really is that it is fucking idiotic to use shit to make a point unless you know where that shit came from.
And, like a lawyer, I never ask a question unless I already know the answer.