Libertarian Anarchist

Don't hold your breath. Neither TM or RW know what libertarians stand for. Just two more ignorant LOLberals shamelessly showing us their ignorance.
 
Don't hold your breath. Neither TM or RW know what libertarians stand for. Just two more ignorant LOLberals shamelessly showing us their ignorance.

LOL

No two libertarians can give you the same answer on what they stand for
 
Its a fools paradice.



Its a club for geeky kids with no real understanding of economics
 
Our founders were more libertarian than anything, with a few exceptions like Hamilton, they wanted the least government possible to maintain social order and protect the rights of the citizen. That's not anarchy, it's just not the statist BS we have now.

Our founding fathers had no other choice. The nation was bankrupt after the Revolution and impediments to transportation and communications between the states made a strong centralized government an impossibility.

Areas outside the populated urban areas did experience anarchy as the weak federal and state governments were unable to maintain control over desolate areas

A strong centralized government was never the intent, the federal government was only intended to do the things a state couldn't do on it's own, like common defense, a postal system and preventing states form taking economic advantage of each other. The federal government is still allowing anarchy to prevail in isolated areas, a prime example is the desert southwest with drug and human smuggling.
 
I bet eflat and I can come real close to the same stances. IN fact, we've done it here for a while. But you'd have to actually know what those stances are without injecting your dullard minded opinion to know that. It's just too hard for you. So you get a pass.... for the special kids room.
 
Our founders were more libertarian than anything, with a few exceptions like Hamilton, they wanted the least government possible to maintain social order and protect the rights of the citizen. That's not anarchy, it's just not the statist BS we have now.

Our founding fathers had no other choice. The nation was bankrupt after the Revolution and impediments to transportation and communications between the states made a strong centralized government an impossibility.

Areas outside the populated urban areas did experience anarchy as the weak federal and state governments were unable to maintain control over desolate areas

A strong centralized government was never the intent, the federal government was only intended to do the things a state couldn't do on it's own, like common defense, a postal system and preventing states form taking economic advantage of each other. The federal government is still allowing anarchy to prevail in isolated areas, a prime example is the desert southwest with drug and human smuggling.




bla bla bla.


your a progrmaed fool
 
I bet eflat and I can come real close to the same stances. IN fact, we've done it here for a while. But you'd have to actually know what those stances are without injecting your dullard minded opinion to know that. It's just too hard for you. So you get a pass.... for the special kids room.

You dont get to define libertarian.

Go get the real definition
 

Forum List

Back
Top