What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

“Liberals Really Need to Look at the Fact that They’re Going to Need to Defend Themselves”

2aguy

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
93,953
Reaction score
33,357
Points
2,250
As opposed to electing one as Speaker of the House (Hastert) and electing another one as President (fat former fascist)


When we found out about Hastert he was abandoned........you guys support your rapists, as you do with Rosenbaum..........and Clinton....the President actually accused of rape by 3 women, and sexual assault by about a dozen...he is still allowed to represent your party...
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
52,729
Reaction score
12,683
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.




And here we go!

Do you think everyone should be armed at these demonstrations?
Demonstrations or riots? Kenosha was a riot, no one should have been there not Rittenhouse or those victims.

The rest of your crap is just that, crap. No one unless it is a left wing nut will come to your conclusions.

The moral of the story is don't go to riots and expect to have any protection.
 

Hellbilly

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
10,057
Reaction score
4,346
Points
265
80 people were murdered by an asshole in a nightclub by arson. Every year people are murdered by arsonists.

How about this, if you commit a violent crime, expect a violent response.
I have no issues with frontier justice.
 

Eric Arthur Blair

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
24,671
Reaction score
14,834
Points
1,415
Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.
Lara Smith seems to always omit one important aspect of the Rittenhouse case:
Self Defense!
I don't know if that's intentional or not but can you ignore the glaring
elephant in the conversation.

Rittenhouse wasn't just shooting protestors...he shot protestors that attacked and threatened him
with guns themselves!


The incredible disconnect among the left, ignoring facts and laying their own insane biases over it all,
makes rational discussion with much of the left impossible.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
64,647
Reaction score
22,489
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually
Wow.....your Rittenhouse Syndrome is really bad....you need to get professional help.
Liberals own guns, enjoy the shooting sports, and carry firearms for lawful self-defense.

And unlike conservatives, liberals support and defend Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Liberals are perfectly capable of defending themselves from the violent, lawless right – with deadly force if warranted and necessary.
 

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
29,293
Reaction score
5,153
Points
290
Location
Where I can see you, but you can't see me
Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.”
Only those people too stupid to understand the meaning of :"self-defene" as per their state laws.
Given the reaction from the verdict, these people are most likely to be --among-- the BLMob, not those who oppose them.
Thus, this verdict makes it more dangerous to protest against the BLMob, not with it.
 

HenryBHough

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
32,236
Reaction score
7,984
Points
1,140
Location
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
A true liberal white person armed with a gun is confronted by a "person of color"- black, brown, red, maybe spotted - who is similarly armed. Said white person immediately pulls his/her/its weapon and shoots him/her/its self in the head to (choose one):

1. Prevent the "person of color" from being accused ever so unfairly.
2. Acceptance of white inferiority.
3. Inability to resist a virtue-signaling opportunity.
4. Abject stupidity.
 
OP
Otis Mayfield

Otis Mayfield

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Messages
4,360
Reaction score
4,124
Points
1,893
LESOCOM211.jpg


For liberals, I suggest the new Cold LESOCOM in 5.56mm. Light weight so you carry it during a protest with plenty of stopping power. And it looks cool.
 

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
29,293
Reaction score
5,153
Points
290
Location
Where I can see you, but you can't see me
LESOCOM211.jpg


For liberals, I suggest the new Cold LESOCOM in 5.56mm. Light weight so you carry it during a protest with plenty of stopping power. And it looks cool.
As most liberals know nothing about guns, they don't want iron sights.
 
OP
Otis Mayfield

Otis Mayfield

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Messages
4,360
Reaction score
4,124
Points
1,893
As most liberals know nothing about guns, they don't want iron sights.

I would advise them to take shooting classes too. Complete noobs often do better at shooting class because they aren't carrying around a lot of false gun lore and they listen to their instructors more.
 

Calypso Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
4,999
Points
1,938
westwall said:
How about this, if you commit a violent crime, expect a violent response.

especially if the police have been defunded and can't make it to the scene. Do they REALLY think that decent law abiding people are gonna let an arsonist continue to destroy peoples' homes, businesses and human beings. The left better be damn sure they know what they're unleashing. Many people aren't going to look to the impotent gov't. They're gonna handle the problem themselves.
 

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
10,746
Reaction score
17,486
Points
2,288
Location
Texas Hill Country
Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.




And here we go!

Do you think everyone should be armed at these demonstrations?

You should have watched the trial, or had someone more intelligent than you (anyone) explain it to you.

You're very severely misinformed about what happened, and now you're spreading that misinformation.
 

westwall

LET'S GO BRANDON!
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
76,727
Reaction score
33,081
Points
2,290
Location
Nevada
Liberals own guns, enjoy the shooting sports, and carry firearms for lawful self-defense.

And unlike conservatives, liberals support and defend Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Liberals are perfectly capable of defending themselves from the violent, lawless right – with deadly force if warranted and necessary.



But it's the violent progressive left who overwhelmingly commits the violence.
 

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
10,746
Reaction score
17,486
Points
2,288
Location
Texas Hill Country
Liberals need to carry guns, period – not just at protests.

They need to defend themselves against the violent, lawless right.

Conservatives have made it clear that they feel justified to resort to violence if they believe the political process is against them; the Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder with impunity by making bad faith claims of ‘self-defense.’

Your fellow BLM/Klantifa rioters killed almost 30 people in 2020 alone. Anyone who DOESN'T arm themselves around savages like that is a fool.
 

Wild Bill Kelsoe

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
3,790
Reaction score
3,311
Points
1,938
Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.




And here we go!

Do you think everyone should be armed at these demonstrations?
We've been trying to explain the importance of gun ownership for self defense to you people for decades...lol

Should the Libtards show up to riot, armed as well? Bad Idea, but I see it become a win for society, therefore, I support it.
 

Wild Bill Kelsoe

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
3,790
Reaction score
3,311
Points
1,938
But they already learned that. The people Kyle pointed his gun at should have blown his head off with rifles,. Would have saved 3 people from getting shot. Protestors also learned that the cops will leave you alone, if you have guns.
And that would have been murder.
 

AZrailwhale

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
3,621
Reaction score
2,911
Points
1,938
Location
Arizona
I think zaminski, another arsonist and looter had his gun illegally too....
Zaminski is up on charges for some of his conduct during the riot, that's why neither the prosecution or defense could call him as a witness, his wife has already pled out on her charges. That was in the record of the trial from when the defense objected to the prosecution referring to them in its closing arguments. The judge ruled that the prosecution couldn't refer to Zaminski, but could refer to his wife because she no longer enjoyed fifth amendment protections.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top