“Liberals Really Need to Look at the Fact that They’re Going to Need to Defend Themselves”

[Calypso Jones]

I think it's still pretty much okay to shoot someone who intends to kill you. Whether you like it or not Otis.

 

[bodecea]

At least "right wingers" know what a real woman is, unlike you libatarded trolls.

Doubtful.

 

[DGS49]

For at least the past 60 years, Leftists have been pining for the "coming Revolution," when the downtrodden masses will rise up against The Man.

I have always thought that this was a foolish fantasy. The people who pine for this revolution presume that it will pit the revolutionaries against the Police. And of course, there would be a lot more revolutionaries than there would be police.

But they ignore something rather overwhelming. The Revolution will not pit the revolutionaries against the police - by themselves. They will be fighting the Police and our heavily armed, law-abiding private citizens, who will not tolerate their institutions and property being destroyed by an army of - if you will pardon my candor - losers.

Kyle Rittenhouse is Exhibit A. He is and was a flawed individual, but if the Revolution does happen, you can multiply Kyle by MILLIONS of like-minded, armed people who will not stand by and watch it happen. And those worthies will have the law on their side, just as Kyle did.

The Leftist revolutionaries of today should take a lesson from this verdict. It is relevant to their aspirations. Peaceful protest is protected activity, but rioting, looting, and general mayhem in the name of faux outrage, not so much.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.

A Liberal Gun Rights Advocate Explains What Both Sides Got Wrong About Kyle Rittenhouse

“It doesn’t complicate my ideas about it. It’s always been complicated. Who’s the good guy with the gun?”

slate.com

And here we go!

Do you think everyone should be armed at these demonstrations?

Liberals need to carry guns, period – not just at protests.

They need to defend themselves against the violent, lawless right.

Conservatives have made it clear that they feel justified to resort to violence if they believe the political process is against them; the Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder with impunity by making bad faith claims of ‘self-defense.’

 

[Concerned American]

Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder

Self defense is not murder. The right is justified in their attempt to return order to the country. Your ilk, BLM and Antifa have run rough shod over the rest of the country for over a year. Time to pay the piper, moron.

 

[2aguy]

Liberals really need to look at the fact that they’re going to need to defend themselves. This verdict isn’t this great acquittal of Rittenhouse being absolutely right, and now we can go shoot protestors. But it will empower a segment of the population to say, “Hey, look, we can go shoot legal protestors now without repercussion.” Liberals need to think about that. Liberals need to be aware that there is this right to self-defense. And one side shouldn’t be the only side that’s armed.

A Liberal Gun Rights Advocate Explains What Both Sides Got Wrong About Kyle Rittenhouse

“It doesn’t complicate my ideas about it. It’s always been complicated. Who’s the good guy with the gun?”

slate.com

And here we go!

Do you think everyone should be armed at these demonstrations?

They were not legal protestors, you fucking moron......they were 4 felons burning and looting Kenosha, and attempting to maim or murder Kyle.......

Are you this stupid in real life, or just when you post?

 

[2aguy]

We know one of the criminals who shouldnt of had a hand gun, had an illegal gun anyway. If you can get a legal gun and carry it legally i am all for it...

I think zaminski, another arsonist and looter had his gun illegally too....

 

[2aguy]

But they already learned that. The people Kyle pointed his gun at should have blown his head off with rifles,. Would have saved 3 people from getting shot. Protestors also learned that the cops will leave you alone, if you have guns.

You guys sure are concerned about the life of a child rapist, who raped 5 boys, age 9-11.....does not speak well of you....

 

[2aguy]

Liberals need to carry guns, period – not just at protests.

They need to defend themselves against the violent, lawless right.

Conservatives have made it clear that they feel justified to resort to violence if they believe the political process is against them; the Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder with impunity by making bad faith claims of ‘self-defense.’

Wow.....your Rittenhouse Syndrome is really bad....you need to get professional help.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

But they already learned that. The people Kyle pointed his gun at should have blown his head off with rifles,. Would have saved 3 people from getting shot. Protestors also learned that the cops will leave you alone, if you have guns.

God Damned you SOBs for what you've done

Hopefully the dead are Biden supporters

 

[Oldestyle]

Liberals need to carry guns, period – not just at protests.

They need to defend themselves against the violent, lawless right.

Conservatives have made it clear that they feel justified to resort to violence if they believe the political process is against them; the Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder with impunity by making bad faith claims of ‘self-defense.’

With all due respect, Clayton..."carrying" a gun and actually being able to use one are two different things! If you on the left arm yourselves in an attempt to intimidate others...you're simply going to increase the number of times a gunfight breaks out between people who shoot well and people that can't hit the broad side of a barn! I've got news for you...that isn't going to go like you want it to!

 

[Oldestyle]

Liberals need to carry guns, period – not just at protests.

They need to defend themselves against the violent, lawless right.

Conservatives have made it clear that they feel justified to resort to violence if they believe the political process is against them; the Rittenhouse verdict has sanctioned conservatives to commit acts of murder with impunity by making bad faith claims of ‘self-defense.’

What the Rittenhouse verdict has made clear is that if liberal leaders order our Police to stand down so that leftist mobs can loot and burn our cities with impunity then ordinary citizens WILL defend their property!
We're tired of the riots. We're tired of the looting. We're tired of the arson. We're tired of the BULLSHIT that you on the left pull every time you think you can get away with it!

 

[westwall]

With all due respect, Clayton..."carrying" a gun and actually being able to use one are two different things! If you on the left arm yourselves in an attempt to intimidate others...you're simply going to increase the number of times a gunfight breaks out between people who shoot well and people that can't hit the broad side of a barn! I've got news for you...that isn't going to go like you want it to!

C claytons people have a well documented history of shooting themselves by accident.

 

[Hellbilly]

Let's see, setting arson fires, felony rioting. Check. Does that meet the definition of a lawful protest? No.

Is the penalty for arson death?

 

[westwall]

Is the penalty for arson death?

When arson kills someone?

You betcha!

 

[Hellbilly]

When arson kills someone?

You betcha!

Who decides? Some kid with an AR or a judge and jury?

 

[2aguy]

C claytons people have a well documented history of shooting themselves by accident.

And those are just the people who know something about the Clintons.......

 

[2aguy]

Is the penalty for arson death?

When you are caught in the act.....especially if someone is in the location you are trying to burn to the ground...like the police station where blmantifa barricaded the doors and set fire to the building....

 

[westwall]

Who decides? Some kid with an AR or a judge and jury?

80 people were murdered by an asshole in a nightclub by arson. Every year people are murdered by arsonists.

How about this, if you commit a violent crime, expect a violent response.

 

[bodecea]

You guys sure are concerned about the life of a child rapist, who raped 5 boys, age 9-11.....does not speak well of you....

As opposed to electing one as Speaker of the House (Hastert) and electing another one as President (fat former fascist)