Liberals now talking "execution" of Trump and republicans

[OldLady]

nah - this is just run of the mill violence both sides condone and do...

HuffPost Hides Article Pushing “Execution” of Trump and GOP Leadership

HUFFPOST HIDES ARTICLE PUSHING “EXECUTION” OF TRUMP AND GOP LEADERSHIP
Shooter attempts massacre of Republicans days after HuffPo piece
Dan Lyman | Infowars.com - JUNE 15, 2017 568 Comments



IMAGE CREDITS: GAGE SKIDMORE / FLICKR.

The HuffPost has removed an article that called for President Donald Trump to be executed, along with all members of his administration and GOP leadership who are complicit in advancing his agenda centered around national security and economic prosperity.

The now-deleted piece was published on June 11 – just days before domestic terrorist James Hodgkinson attempted to massacre dozens of GOP lawmakers during an early morning baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia.

In the article, headlined “Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice” HuffPo contributor David Fuller declares that the President must be prosecuted for treason and put to death if found guilty, before going on to demonstrate why he believes Trump and most of the Republican Party are indisputably guilty of treason.

“Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted for treason and — if convicted in a court of law — executed,” writes Fuller. “Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces.”

In the concluding paragraph, Fuller also makes his case for why the “ultimate punishment” of the President must also be exacted on more Republicans – emphasizing his desires by adding bold font to a line about execution, as demonstrated below.

“Draining the swamp means not only ejecting Trump from the presidency, but also bringing himself and everyone assisting in his agenda up on charges of treason,” he writes. “They must be convicted (there is little room to doubt their guilt).”

“And then — upon receiving guilty verdicts — they must all be executed under the law.”

Alex Jones!

Alexander Emerick Jones is an American far-right radio show host, filmmaker, writer, and conspiracy theorist.Wikipedia

Born: February 11, 1974 (age 43), Dallas, TX
Height: 5′ 10″
Full name: Alexander Emerick Jones
Spouse: Kelly Rebecca Nichols (m. ?–2015)
Education: Anderson High School, Austin Community College District

It's true (skip the incendiary adjectives). I checked.

 

[OldLady]

nah - this is just run of the mill violence both sides condone and do...

HuffPost Hides Article Pushing “Execution” of Trump and GOP Leadership

HUFFPOST HIDES ARTICLE PUSHING “EXECUTION” OF TRUMP AND GOP LEADERSHIP
Shooter attempts massacre of Republicans days after HuffPo piece
Dan Lyman | Infowars.com - JUNE 15, 2017 568 Comments



IMAGE CREDITS: GAGE SKIDMORE / FLICKR.

The HuffPost has removed an article that called for President Donald Trump to be executed, along with all members of his administration and GOP leadership who are complicit in advancing his agenda centered around national security and economic prosperity.

The now-deleted piece was published on June 11 – just days before domestic terrorist James Hodgkinson attempted to massacre dozens of GOP lawmakers during an early morning baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia.

In the article, headlined “Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice” HuffPo contributor David Fuller declares that the President must be prosecuted for treason and put to death if found guilty, before going on to demonstrate why he believes Trump and most of the Republican Party are indisputably guilty of treason.

“Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted for treason and — if convicted in a court of law — executed,” writes Fuller. “Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces.”

In the concluding paragraph, Fuller also makes his case for why the “ultimate punishment” of the President must also be exacted on more Republicans – emphasizing his desires by adding bold font to a line about execution, as demonstrated below.

“Draining the swamp means not only ejecting Trump from the presidency, but also bringing himself and everyone assisting in his agenda up on charges of treason,” he writes. “They must be convicted (there is little room to doubt their guilt).”

“And then — upon receiving guilty verdicts — they must all be executed under the law.”

That was one liberal's op ed. And the paper took it down, even though the guy didn't advocate anything unlawful. I don't agree with the guy and if I'd been the editor, I'm not sure I would have run it. But we don't always like what free speech brings us, do we? They didn't "hide it," they took it down out of respect after the outrageous attack on Republicans in Virginia. Don't feed crazies' brains.

And USMB carries on pointing fingers and blaming the other side for violence and divisiveness. There's plenty to go around on both sides. Maybe using a little patience and respect with each other would get everyone farther than starting thread after endless thread making the argument more heated. You think maybe?

I think using the term "hide" is in itself indicative of a certain bias but it IS infowars after all...

I usually skip InfoWars stuff altogether, but I checked this one out--it was true.

i also try to avoid sites like this but did my homework also - at least i do try before posting things like this.

It does no good to keep this up. So if you want to be heard by people with a different point of view, stop making the canyon between us wider and deeper with more and more of these threads.

 

[iceberg]

nah - this is just run of the mill violence both sides condone and do...

HuffPost Hides Article Pushing “Execution” of Trump and GOP Leadership

HUFFPOST HIDES ARTICLE PUSHING “EXECUTION” OF TRUMP AND GOP LEADERSHIP
Shooter attempts massacre of Republicans days after HuffPo piece
Dan Lyman | Infowars.com - JUNE 15, 2017 568 Comments



IMAGE CREDITS: GAGE SKIDMORE / FLICKR.

The HuffPost has removed an article that called for President Donald Trump to be executed, along with all members of his administration and GOP leadership who are complicit in advancing his agenda centered around national security and economic prosperity.

The now-deleted piece was published on June 11 – just days before domestic terrorist James Hodgkinson attempted to massacre dozens of GOP lawmakers during an early morning baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia.

In the article, headlined “Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice” HuffPo contributor David Fuller declares that the President must be prosecuted for treason and put to death if found guilty, before going on to demonstrate why he believes Trump and most of the Republican Party are indisputably guilty of treason.

“Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted for treason and — if convicted in a court of law — executed,” writes Fuller. “Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces.”

In the concluding paragraph, Fuller also makes his case for why the “ultimate punishment” of the President must also be exacted on more Republicans – emphasizing his desires by adding bold font to a line about execution, as demonstrated below.

“Draining the swamp means not only ejecting Trump from the presidency, but also bringing himself and everyone assisting in his agenda up on charges of treason,” he writes. “They must be convicted (there is little room to doubt their guilt).”

“And then — upon receiving guilty verdicts — they must all be executed under the law.”

That was one liberal's op ed. And the paper took it down, even though the guy didn't advocate anything unlawful. I don't agree with the guy and if I'd been the editor, I'm not sure I would have run it. But we don't always like what free speech brings us, do we? They didn't "hide it," they took it down out of respect after the outrageous attack on Republicans in Virginia. Don't feed crazies' brains.

And USMB carries on pointing fingers and blaming the other side for violence and divisiveness. There's plenty to go around on both sides. Maybe using a little patience and respect with each other would get everyone farther than starting thread after endless thread making the argument more heated. You think maybe?

I think using the term "hide" is in itself indicative of a certain bias but it IS infowars after all...

I usually skip InfoWars stuff altogether, but I checked this one out--it was true.

i also try to avoid sites like this but did my homework also - at least i do try before posting things like this.

It does no good to keep this up. So if you want to be heard by people with a different point of view, stop making the canyon between us wider and deeper with more and more of these threads.

by that token posting in these forums does no good does it? we all quit and get off social media we're fine.

good luck with that. if i bother you, ignore me.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It would make no sense in making Trump a Martyr, and putting Pence in the Oval Office. No sense at all.

All we can do is hope that our country survives until Jan of 2021 and that a man or woman of integrity and intelligence replaces Trump, and picks a man or woman of integrity and intelligence to be his or her running mate.

 

[easyt65]

If we survived 8 years of Obama, we can easily survive 4 years of Trump.

The question is, can the GOP survive 4 years of extreme leftist hate, fake news, witch hunts, continued violent liberal propaganda, and radicalized would-be snowe assassins...

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Then they pulled it. It's time to start arresting these folks. No, they are NOT protected by the First Amendment!

HuffPo Pulls Article Calling For ‘Ultimate Punishment’ Of Trump

 

[Political Junky]

Daily Caller is to blame for keeping you ignorant.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

The press are pests.

 

[eagle7_31]

And by "liberals", the OP means "some person that nobody ever heard of or cares about, and whose crazy idea was immediately squashed by the liberals."

In contrast, conservatives always heap praise on other conservatives who call for violence.

The two sides are very different that way. Liberals condemn violence, conservatives support it.

You are a stone cold liar and a gutless one at that.

 

[Freewill]

nah - this is just run of the mill violence both sides condone and do...

HuffPost Hides Article Pushing “Execution” of Trump and GOP Leadership

HUFFPOST HIDES ARTICLE PUSHING “EXECUTION” OF TRUMP AND GOP LEADERSHIP
Shooter attempts massacre of Republicans days after HuffPo piece
Dan Lyman | Infowars.com - JUNE 15, 2017 568 Comments



IMAGE CREDITS: GAGE SKIDMORE / FLICKR.

The HuffPost has removed an article that called for President Donald Trump to be executed, along with all members of his administration and GOP leadership who are complicit in advancing his agenda centered around national security and economic prosperity.

The now-deleted piece was published on June 11 – just days before domestic terrorist James Hodgkinson attempted to massacre dozens of GOP lawmakers during an early morning baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia.

In the article, headlined “Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice” HuffPo contributor David Fuller declares that the President must be prosecuted for treason and put to death if found guilty, before going on to demonstrate why he believes Trump and most of the Republican Party are indisputably guilty of treason.

“Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted for treason and — if convicted in a court of law — executed,” writes Fuller. “Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces.”

In the concluding paragraph, Fuller also makes his case for why the “ultimate punishment” of the President must also be exacted on more Republicans – emphasizing his desires by adding bold font to a line about execution, as demonstrated below.

“Draining the swamp means not only ejecting Trump from the presidency, but also bringing himself and everyone assisting in his agenda up on charges of treason,” he writes. “They must be convicted (there is little room to doubt their guilt).”

“And then — upon receiving guilty verdicts — they must all be executed under the law.”

Progressives, not liberals.

Two different things.
.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Progressives, not liberals.

Two different things.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Calling a thing by a different name does not change what it is.

 

[Mac1958]

Progressives, not liberals.

Two different things.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Calling a thing by a different name does not change what it is.

The people who have taken over the Democratic Party are not liberals.

Traditional liberals are open-minded, curious, decent and tolerant. They believe in freedom of expression.

These people are pretty much the antithesis of that.
.

 

[mamooth]

You are a stone cold liar and a gutless one at that.

Little snowflake, if you're not a proud fascist suckup, condemn Death Angle for his call here to have the brownshirts go arrest people for simply writing things.

"Then they pulled it. It's time to start arresting these folks. No, they are NOT protected by the First Amendment!"

You won't, of course. None of the conservatives here will ever criticize another conservative for being violent and fascist. That's the point. While not all the conservatives here call for fascism and violence themselves, they all give a big thumbs-up to it by either ignoring it, or by actively running cover for it by projecting their own fascism-lust on to liberals.

 

[OldLady]

That was one liberal's op ed. And the paper took it down, even though the guy didn't advocate anything unlawful. I don't agree with the guy and if I'd been the editor, I'm not sure I would have run it. But we don't always like what free speech brings us, do we? They didn't "hide it," they took it down out of respect after the outrageous attack on Republicans in Virginia. Don't feed crazies' brains.

And USMB carries on pointing fingers and blaming the other side for violence and divisiveness. There's plenty to go around on both sides. Maybe using a little patience and respect with each other would get everyone farther than starting thread after endless thread making the argument more heated. You think maybe?

I think using the term "hide" is in itself indicative of a certain bias but it IS infowars after all...

I usually skip InfoWars stuff altogether, but I checked this one out--it was true.

i also try to avoid sites like this but did my homework also - at least i do try before posting things like this.

It does no good to keep this up. So if you want to be heard by people with a different point of view, stop making the canyon between us wider and deeper with more and more of these threads.

by that token posting in these forums does no good does it? we all quit and get off social media we're fine.

good luck with that. if i bother you, ignore me.

I am struggling to understand how you got that message from my post. I was just saying stop the finger pointing about who is more violent, more worser, baddest evil dude. Posting to these forums does not have to be about that.
(1) Yes, I know "more worser" is not good grammar and (2) you don't bother me at all.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Progressives, not liberals.

Two different things.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Calling a thing by a different name does not change what it is.

The people who have taken over the Democratic Party are not liberals.

Traditional liberals are open-minded, curious, decent and tolerant. They believe in freedom of expression.

These people are pretty much the antithesis of that.
.

Those identified by the label “liberal” have not been that way for several decades, at least. Even back when “liberals” were big on “freedom of speech”, that only meant that they were in favor of pornography, obscenity, and other degrading expressions—never about true freedom of speech in the form of being able to freely express important opinions and beliefs, however controversial.

 

[Mac1958]

Progressives, not liberals.

Two different things.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Calling a thing by a different name does not change what it is.

The people who have taken over the Democratic Party are not liberals.

Traditional liberals are open-minded, curious, decent and tolerant. They believe in freedom of expression.

These people are pretty much the antithesis of that.
.

Those identified by the label “liberal” have not been that way for several decades, at least. Even back when “liberals” were big on “freedom of speech”, that only meant that they were in favor of pornography, obscenity, and other degrading expressions—never about true freedom of speech in the form of being able to freely express important opinions and beliefs, however controversial.

Their proud, constant and blatant attacks on freedom of expression are the single biggest illustration of what has happened to them.

Just remember, these people don't represent everyone who leans to the left of center.
.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Their proud, constant and blatant attacks on freedom of expression are the single biggest illustration of what has happened to them.

Just remember, these people don't represent everyone who leans to the left of center.

Outliers don't refute what the bulk shows us.

 

[Mac1958]

Their proud, constant and blatant attacks on freedom of expression are the single biggest illustration of what has happened to them. Just remember, these people don't represent everyone who leans to the left of center.

Outliers don't refute what the bulk shows us.

Well, I like to think that the regressives are a minority, just much louder and nastier.
.