Liberals: Are you getting worried yet?

[Uncensored2008]

You are one dumb ****. You proved it on the family leader pledge thread and you are proving it here.

Well yeah, showing the Obama debt is just not right. I should be worshiping Dear Leader like you do, not exposing his debt...

ROFL

What a fool you are...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

If it's not, your chart sure didn't prove it.

Wait... you mean $3.7T is "quadruple" $3.2T?

Really?

What does $3.2 trillion have to do with anything?

You don't seem to comprehend what you're correspondent is trying to explain to you. Of course, inability to learn is a classic symptom of liberalism.

You're right. I did make a mistake. Spending this year is only about $3.4T, not $3.7T.

The claim was made that Obama is spending "quadruple" what Bush spent. Bush "spent" 3.2T dollars in his last budget (2008-2009). Obama "spent" $3.4T in his last, highest budget (2010-2011).

So, is $3.4T "quadruple" $3.2T?

 

[Salt Jones]

You are one dumb ****. You proved it on the family leader pledge thread and you are proving it here.

Well yeah, showing the Obama debt is just not right. I should be worshiping Dear Leader like you do, not exposing his debt...

ROFL

What a fool you are...

This right here is why you are a dumb ****. You are too dumb to realize how much of a dumb **** you are.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

First of all, the US federal government spent $2.2T in 2002, not $547B.

Second, you can't compare Bush's first budget to Obama, since Bush increased spending by an additional $1T by the end of his term. So, in reality, Obama's first full budget (2010) is actually only a few hundred billion dollars more than Bush's last budget (far from a "quadrupling").

It seems that a year to year comparison is more accurate. I fully expect that by the time Obama leaves office on Jan. 20, 2013, he will tack several trillion more in spending on.

Even if you did use Bush's first year (which is ridiculous), $3.4T isn't "quadruple" $2.2T.

But I don't think you understand how it works. A new president doesn't get to start fresh - they're left with the government that the last guy left them. Obama "increased" spending by less than $500B.

 

[rightwinger]

I like this election

Republicans are running their worst candidates in a generation. Any Republican with a chance of winning is holding out until 2016.

Romney will get the GOP nod and will offer token opposition

 

[hellofromwarsaw]

Nothing as thick as the Pub Dupe numbskull. Bachmann/ Palin 2012!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Kerry was beating Bush in August of 2004.

McCain was beating Obama in September of 2008.

Why would any sensible person worry about this?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yeah, that's not in the slightest bit true.

If it's not, your chart sure didn't prove it.

Wait... you mean $3.7T is "quadruple" $3.2T?

Really?

Take the line marked 2002 - stick a pin right where the blue hits it. (It's okay, it won't hurt your monitor!) Now do the same for 2011. Count the number of squares....

 

[Uncensored2008]

I like this election

Republicans are running their worst candidates in a generation. Any Republican with a chance of winning is holding out until 2016.

Romney will get the GOP nod and will offer token opposition

What's the diff Mitt is the democrats choice, just as open borders McCain was. You're banking on the Republicans once again fielding the candidate the democrats choose. That may not work out for you.

 

[rdean]

A shrinking base really scares me.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-on-during-the-next-election.html#post3865579

 

[skookerasbil]

CNBC Markets today................

Here comes the inflation..............

News Headlines


Hey......but if you're a liberal........everythings peachy!!! Go check out the headlines at DRUDGE this am..........its all awesome!!!

 

[rightwinger]

I like this election

Republicans are running their worst candidates in a generation. Any Republican with a chance of winning is holding out until 2016.

Romney will get the GOP nod and will offer token opposition

What's the diff Mitt is the democrats choice, just as open borders McCain was. You're banking on the Republicans once again fielding the candidate the democrats choose. That may not work out for you.

Romney will win the GOP nomination. He is the only adult in the room. The TeaTards will hold their noses and pile on a platform of social conservatism and unworkable fiscal policies

Obama will have an easy win in 2012 and the Republicans will throw Romney under the bus

 

[Robert]

Its looking like anyone except Obama and the Dem's

"Republican Candidate" Extends Lead vs. Obama to 47% to 39%

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm not worried. I can't wait for "generic republican" to raise cash, give his/her's platform and debate Obama. Wait until the liberal media gets a hold of GPub.

Yep. Generic Republican doesn't have any baggage.

The funnier part is, the only real life Republican in the race that has shown any semblance of being competitive with Obama is the one the rightwing hates,

Mitt Romney.

 

[Moonglow]

"Registered voters by a significant margin now say they are more likely to vote for the "Republican Party's candidate for president" than for President Barack Obama in the 2012 election, 47% to 39%. Preferences had been fairly evenly divided this year in this test of Obama's re-election prospects."

Any Republican: 47%

Obama: 39%

The worm turns.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I like this election

Republicans are running their worst candidates in a generation. Any Republican with a chance of winning is holding out until 2016.

Romney will get the GOP nod and will offer token opposition

What's the diff Mitt is the democrats choice, just as open borders McCain was. You're banking on the Republicans once again fielding the candidate the democrats choose. That may not work out for you.

Romney will win the GOP nomination. He is the only adult in the room. The TeaTards will hold their noses and pile on a platform of social conservatism and unworkable fiscal policies
Obama will have an easy win in 2012 and the Republicans will throw Romney under the bus

I think we've had a snootful of this in the last three years. Sorry Karl, the party's over.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm not worried. I can't wait for "generic republican" to raise cash, give his/her's platform and debate Obama. Wait until the liberal media gets a hold of GPub.

Yep. Generic Republican doesn't have any baggage.

The funnier part is, the only real life Republican in the race that has shown any semblance of being competitive with Obama is the one the rightwing hates,

Mitt Romney.

We do? Do tell.

 

[rightwinger]

I'm not worried. I can't wait for "generic republican" to raise cash, give his/her's platform and debate Obama. Wait until the liberal media gets a hold of GPub.

Yep. Generic Republican doesn't have any baggage.

The funnier part is, the only real life Republican in the race that has shown any semblance of being competitive with Obama is the one the rightwing hates,

Mitt Romney.

We do? Do tell.

Polls say you do...


But feel free to explain which other candidate stands a stronger chance than Romney

 

[Uncensored2008]

Romney will win the GOP nomination.

I wouldn't count on it.

He is the only adult in the room.

You mean that he's the only one who will lose to Obama.

The TeaTards will hold their noses and pile on a platform of social conservatism and unworkable fiscal policies

You mean, cutting the waste of the federal government?

Obama will have an easy win in 2012 and the Republicans will throw Romney under the bus

Provided you can force What's the diff Mitt on the GOP, Obama will have a close win - due people being ambivalent. I don't see Romney getting the nomination - no matter how badly you want him to.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Its looking like anyone except Obama and the Dem's

I think Romney would lose to Obama. He offers no alternative. Romney and Obama have the same positions and the same agenda. The awakened masses of the TEA party will not vote for Romney. Romney is a far left kook.