Liberals: 9-11 Deaths were Good Thing

[Jackson]

Most of the liberals on this thread don't know who Ward Churchill is. That is a good thing. Churchill was a fringe liberal who was so far left he almost fell off the grid.

If liberals heard what he espoused, they'd probably surprised as we were that he held any job in academia. I give liberals credit for that.

 

[aaronleland]

Most of the liberals on this thread don't know who Ward Churchill is. That is a good thing. Churchill was a fringe liberal who was so far left he almost fell off the grid.

If liberals heard what he espoused, they'd probably surprised as we were that he held any job in academia. I give liberals credit for that.

Thanks. If only Mac could acknowledge that. I see nobody lying or deflecting in this thread. They are only asking why they should be forced to condemn the comments of a man almost nobody has heard of. This entire thread was built off of a strawman.

 

[candycorn]

Most of the liberals on this thread don't know who Ward Churchill is. That is a good thing. Churchill was a fringe liberal who was so far left he almost fell off the grid.

If liberals heard what he espoused, they'd probably surprised as we were that he held any job in academia. I give liberals credit for that.

Thanks. If only Mac could acknowledge that. I see nobody lying or deflecting in this thread. They are only asking why they should be forced to condemn the comments of a man almost nobody has heard of. This entire thread was built off of a strawman.

Meanwhile, he refuses to answer whether or not he still beats his wife.

Do I think he beats his wife? No. Of course not.

But it's funny how someone can make an
idiotic
unfounded
allegation backed up by no proof about people he disagrees with politically and he climbs on board

but when someone else makes an
idiotic
unfounded
allegation backed up by no proof about him, he clams up and refuses to dignify it with a response.

 

[Mac1958]

Most of the liberals on this thread don't know who Ward Churchill is. That is a good thing. Churchill was a fringe liberal who was so far left he almost fell off the grid.

If liberals heard what he espoused, they'd probably surprised as we were that he held any job in academia. I give liberals credit for that.

Thanks. If only Mac could acknowledge that. I see nobody lying or deflecting in this thread. They are only asking why they should be forced to condemn the comments of a man almost nobody has heard of. This entire thread was built off of a strawman.

I'm more than happy to acknowledge that most liberals don't or wouldn't agree with what Churchill said, whether they know who he is or not.

All I did was ask for comments from the Left. Why? Well, I'd guess that there is a small percentage who actually agree with him, just as there would be a small percentage on the Right who would agree some crazy thing hardcore right winger said. But I would also guess, and I think I've been proven right, that many would avoid the same kind of clear, passionate attack on him that they would wage on a right winger. My point is about the intellectual dishonesty of partisan ideologues.

And of course there has been deflection. Names of wild-eyed right wing partisans like Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter have been thrown into the conversation specifically to move us from the topic of the OP. That's the very definition of "deflection".

You folks have taken my relatively benign posts, inferred what you have inferred, and have become very defensive. Not my fault.

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

When someone engages in cheap debate tactics.....they will likely get the same in return.

Earmuffs.

 

[OldUSAFSniper]

Do I beat my wife? Well, she passed away about five years ago, so no, I do not. I was married to her for 37 years and I can honestly say that she was the meanest, strongest, most stubborn, bull-headed woman that ever has or will ever walk the face of this earth. I loved her with all of my heart and miss her daily. If I had ever raised a hand to her I would have drawn back a bloody stump, I assure you. Beat my wife? Obviously not, I'm still alive.

Speaking to the OP, Ward Churchill is like the aftermath of a tornado that tears through the center of town. He's a freakin loon that is not liberal, he's a disaster. And people come to see what the disaster has wrought, kind of like why people slow to look at a car wreck. His opinions smell like roadkill skunk and I would hope that there wouldn't be an individual on this forum who would support this maniac. Megan Kelly did a disservice by giving this underwear stain a forum for his viewpoints.

Liberals do perplex me, but surely there wouldn't be anyone who would seriously entertain the same thoughts?

 

[Mac1958]

Liberals do perplex me, but surely there wouldn't be anyone who would seriously entertain the same thoughts?

I think there is a place on the rear end (appropriately) of the political spectrum where Left and Right meet, where people essentially are anarchists who want to see the world burn. A very tiny percentage, fortunately, but they're there, and he's one of them.

.

 

[candycorn]

Do I beat my wife? Well, she passed away about five years ago, so no, I do not. I was married to her for 37 years and I can honestly say that she was the meanest, strongest, most stubborn, bull-headed woman that ever has or will ever walk the face of this earth. I loved her with all of my heart and miss her daily. If I had ever raised a hand to her I would have drawn back a bloody stump, I assure you. Beat my wife? Obviously not, I'm still alive.

Speaking to the OP, Ward Churchill is like the aftermath of a tornado that tears through the center of town. He's a freakin loon that is not liberal, he's a disaster. And people come to see what the disaster has wrought, kind of like why people slow to look at a car wreck. His opinions smell like roadkill skunk and I would hope that there wouldn't be an individual on this forum who would support this maniac. Megan Kelly did a disservice by giving this underwear stain a forum for his viewpoints.

Liberals do perplex me, but surely there wouldn't be anyone who would seriously entertain the same thoughts?

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

As for as liberals perplexing you...he appeared on Fox News....blame them.

 

[candycorn]

When someone engages in cheap debate tactics.....they will likely get the same in return.

Earmuffs.

Again, when he alleges that we (liberals) thought that the 9/11/01 deaths are a "good thing", it crosses the line between the usual moronic banter here (from both sides).

 

[LeftofLeft]

When someone engages in cheap debate tactics.....they will likely get the same in return.

Earmuffs.

Again, when he alleges that we (liberals) thought that the 9/11/01 deaths are a "good thing", it crosses the line between the usual moronic banter here (from both sides).

Ward Churchill 9 11 Victims Were Little Eichmanns That Got What They Had Coming Liberal Quote Database
Recently Megan Kelly interviewed former professor and liberal darling Ward Churchill who infamously said that the attacks on the twin towers were acceptable actions. Liberal blogosphere and web sites have been coming to his defense. Also, note the other stories on the tabs to the right on the page I posted. All straight from talking points of Democrats. Nawwww, the Democrats haven't went too far left. Nawwww the socialist haven't taken over the party.
The Justice of Roosting Chickens Ward Churchill Speaks Democracy Now
Here is another leftist site that advocates for Churchill. This mans views would easily fit with the opinions of the lefty bloggers on this board.

Siding with Ward Churchill is ANTI-AMERICAN. He hates America. Standing with him, supporting him in any way is Hating America.

 

[Mac1958]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

 

[candycorn]

When someone engages in cheap debate tactics.....they will likely get the same in return.

Earmuffs.

Again, when he alleges that we (liberals) thought that the 9/11/01 deaths are a "good thing", it crosses the line between the usual moronic banter here (from both sides).

Ward Churchill 9 11 Victims Were Little Eichmanns That Got What They Had Coming Liberal Quote Database
Recently Megan Kelly interviewed former professor and liberal darling Ward Churchill who infamously said that the attacks on the twin towers were acceptable actions. Liberal blogosphere and web sites have been coming to his defense. Also, note the other stories on the tabs to the right on the page I posted. All straight from talking points of Democrats. Nawwww, the Democrats haven't went too far left. Nawwww the socialist haven't taken over the party.
The Justice of Roosting Chickens Ward Churchill Speaks Democracy Now
Here is another leftist site that advocates for Churchill. This mans views would easily fit with the opinions of the lefty bloggers on this board.

Siding with Ward Churchill is ANTI-AMERICAN. He hates America. Standing with him, supporting him in any way is Hating America.

Feel free to show where any large number of USMB liberals stood with him (whatever that means) or "supported him in any way"?

Apparently, Fox is the one giving this guy a platform and a voice on their airwaves....do they "hate America" because by doing so...they certainly are supporting his notoriety, presence, etc...

Had the OP not brought it up, nobody would be talking about this topic or this loser.

 

[Mac1958]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Anywhere near it?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

 

[candycorn]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

You said there was no denials and alleged that by not denying it, liberals must agree with it.


Did you stop beating your wife? If you don't deny such an outrageous allegation..does that obviously mean you are saying it happened?

So are you still working her over or not? Your call

 

[Mac1958]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

You said there was no denials and alleged that by not denying it, liberals must agree with it.

Did you stop beating your wife? If you don't deny such an outrageous allegation..does that obviously mean you are saying it happened?

So are you still working her over or not? Your call

When did I allege that?

Where? Precisely?

Do you know what "allege" even means?

Show us.

I didn't know you were such a blatant liar, candycorn.

 

[candycorn]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

You said there was no denials and alleged that by not denying it, liberals must agree with it.

Did you stop beating your wife? If you don't deny such an outrageous allegation..does that obviously mean you are saying it happened?

So are you still working her over or not? Your call

When did I allege that?

Where? Precisely?

Do you know what "allege" even means?

Show us.

I didn't know you were such a blatant liar, candycorn.

I didn't know you were so obtuse...

The Op allleges that liberals support the notion that 9/11 deaths are a "good thing"

Here is the title: "
"Liberals: 9-11 Deaths were Good Thing" Perhaps you can show us where you told the author of the OP that he was full of beans....you can do that...can't you? Oh wait...you can't? Well...

Anyway, when there were no liberal denials of such an obvious bullshit allegation (at 3:05 AM), you found that "interesting"
"Interesting, I don't see any denials yet."

If not to infer that liberals agree, what was your point in writing that?

So again, are you still beating your wife? If you don't deny it...I find that "interesting"....

 

[LoneLaugher]

Here is what happened in Mac's world.

News story of liberal saying really heinous things.......10 years ago.....posted by USMB nutter who claims that liberals are glad about 9-11.

Mac sees this. He thinks......."Oooh! I can get them ideologues on this one. If I challenge them to deny the claim.....and they don't......it will show everyone how nasty they are and how deep their ideological bent goes! Ha Ha!"

"And...if they do deny it......I can chalk it up as another case of Pavlov's Dog theory.......I can make those losers do my every bidding!!Ha Ha! "

Mac called out for dopey tactic. Mac goes into full denial mode.....complete with accusations of deflections and "I told ya so's"

Tool.

 

[Mac1958]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

You said there was no denials and alleged that by not denying it, liberals must agree with it.

Did you stop beating your wife? If you don't deny such an outrageous allegation..does that obviously mean you are saying it happened?

So are you still working her over or not? Your call

When did I allege that?

Where? Precisely?

Do you know what "allege" even means?

Show us.

I didn't know you were such a blatant liar, candycorn.

I didn't know you were so obtuse...

The Op allleges that liberals support the notion that 9/11 deaths are a "good thing"

Here is the title: "
"Liberals: 9-11 Deaths were Good Thing" Perhaps you can show us where you told the author of the OP that he was full of beans....you can do that...can't you? Oh wait...you can't? Well...

Anyway, when there were no liberal denials of such an obvious bullshit allegation (at 3:05 AM), you found that "interesting"
"Interesting, I don't see any denials yet."

If not to infer that liberals agree, what was your point in writing that?

So again, are you still beating your wife? If you don't deny it...I find that "interesting"....

I explained my point in post 124.

Not sure how much more clear I can make it than that.

You were mistaken in what you inferred from my posts.

.

 

[candycorn]

Here is what happened in Mac's world.

News story of liberal saying really heinous things.......10 years ago.....posted by USMB nutter who claims that liberals are glad about 9-11.

Mac sees this. He thinks......."Oooh! I can get them ideologues on this one. If I challenge them to deny the claim.....and they don't......it will show everyone how nasty they are and how deep their ideological bent goes! Ha Ha!"

"And...if they do deny it......I can chalk it up as another case of Pavlov's Dog theory.......I can make those losers do my every bidding!!Ha Ha! "

Mac called out for dopey tactic. Mac goes into full denial mode.....complete with accusations of deflections and "I told ya so's"

Tool.

Precisely what happened.

 

[candycorn]

It was directed @ Mac who is now busy in damage control...

If anyone alleged that you think the deaths on 9/11/01 were "good things" would you get upset? Mac did. You did not.

Would you like to show me precisely where I said anything like that?

Or would you like to admit that you're lying?

Your call.

.

You said there was no denials and alleged that by not denying it, liberals must agree with it.

Did you stop beating your wife? If you don't deny such an outrageous allegation..does that obviously mean you are saying it happened?

So are you still working her over or not? Your call

When did I allege that?

Where? Precisely?

Do you know what "allege" even means?

Show us.

I didn't know you were such a blatant liar, candycorn.

I didn't know you were so obtuse...

The Op allleges that liberals support the notion that 9/11 deaths are a "good thing"

Here is the title: "
"Liberals: 9-11 Deaths were Good Thing" Perhaps you can show us where you told the author of the OP that he was full of beans....you can do that...can't you? Oh wait...you can't? Well...

Anyway, when there were no liberal denials of such an obvious bullshit allegation (at 3:05 AM), you found that "interesting"
"Interesting, I don't see any denials yet."

If not to infer that liberals agree, what was your point in writing that?

So again, are you still beating your wife? If you don't deny it...I find that "interesting"....

I explained my point in post 124.

Not sure how much more clear I can make it than that.

You were mistaken in what you inferred from my posts.

.

Gee, only took you over 24 hours to come clean....perhaps you can be more intellectually honest in the future. Though I doubt it.