Liberal Protestors Terrorize Trig Palin At Phoenix Rally: Shout "Go Home","You Stink"

[bigrebnc1775]

Wow, the article is, like, totally different than your thread title.

If Sarah Palin doesn't want her children to be caught in the crossfire of the rhetoric she actively stokes for a dollar, she shouldn't take them on her public speaking trail.

She actively chose to be a public persona and to go around the country spreading vitriol. She shouldn't expect much sympathy from the people she pisses on regularly, even if she is using her kids as rhetorical human shields.

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Actually, if you had even a slight clue to reality, you would understand that some of those thank you's mine for instance had nothing to do with the last paragraph or Sarah bringing her son to the event, but rather the fact that the title of this thread is 100% dishonest.

Immie

Why would you thank someone for a dishonest thread?

 

[geauxtohell]

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Actually, if you had even a slight clue to reality, you would understand that some of those thank you's mine for instance had nothing to do with the last paragraph or Sarah bringing her son to the event, but rather the fact that the title of this thread is 100% dishonest.

Immie

Why would you thank someone for a dishonest thread?

****-dammit you are dense.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wow, the article is, like, totally different than your thread title.

If Sarah Palin doesn't want her children to be caught in the crossfire of the rhetoric she actively stokes for a dollar, she shouldn't take them on her public speaking trail.

She actively chose to be a public persona and to go around the country spreading vitriol. She shouldn't expect much sympathy from the people she pisses on regularly, even if she is using her kids as rhetorical human shields.

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Yeah. She takes her mothering responsibility so seriously that she uses her kids as political props. How many ******* times did she reference Trig over the abortion issue? I agree family should be off limits, however, Palin has hardly tried to keep her family out of the limelight.

In this instance, the protesters weren't yelling at Trig, as much as ArmyRetard would like to lie about the facts, and now people are trying to tell us that Palin shouldn't be heckled when she is lugging around her kid?

Get real.

Does she use her children for political purposes? Then I guess you have something against obama for doing the samething? Lest we forget about the puppy?

 

[Brn2bfree]

Liberals are such intollerant pieces of human debris

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Actually, if you had even a slight clue to reality, you would understand that some of those thank you's mine for instance had nothing to do with the last paragraph or Sarah bringing her son to the event, but rather the fact that the title of this thread is 100% dishonest.

Immie

Why would you thank someone for a dishonest thread?

****-dammit you are dense.

Well educate me on this thank you stuff. WHy would Immanuel give a thank you to a thread that was dishonest?

 

[geauxtohell]

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Yeah. She takes her mothering responsibility so seriously that she uses her kids as political props. How many ******* times did she reference Trig over the abortion issue? I agree family should be off limits, however, Palin has hardly tried to keep her family out of the limelight.

In this instance, the protesters weren't yelling at Trig, as much as ArmyRetard would like to lie about the facts, and now people are trying to tell us that Palin shouldn't be heckled when she is lugging around her kid?

Get real.

Does she use her children for political purposes? Then I guess you have something against obama for doing the samething? Lest we forget about the puppy?

Yes. In the example I named above:

Sarah Palin Discusses Trig Decision: She Had to 'Walk the Walk' | wowOwow

She's used the fact that she didn't abort her son when she found out he had downs to score points with the pro-lifers.

Which is a little more direct than the typical photo-op stuff you referenced above (which palin has also been more than happy to engage in as well).

 

[geauxtohell]

Why would you thank someone for a dishonest thread?

****-dammit you are dense.

Well educate me on this thank you stuff. WHy would Immanuel give a thank you to a thread that was dishonest?

Because I was the one that pointed out it was dishonest.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

****-dammit you are dense.

Well educate me on this thank you stuff. WHy would Immanuel give a thank you to a thread that was dishonest?

Because I was the one that pointed out it was dishonest.

Unless you have proof that she uses her children for political purpose, then your reply is dishonest even more than what you pointed out about the OP

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[Rinata]

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Yeah. She takes her mothering responsibility so seriously that she uses her kids as political props. How many ******* times did she reference Trig over the abortion issue? I agree family should be off limits, however, Palin has hardly tried to keep her family out of the limelight.

In this instance, the protesters weren't yelling at Trig, as much as ArmyRetard would like to lie about the facts, and now people are trying to tell us that Palin shouldn't be heckled when she is lugging around her kid?

Get real.

Does she use her children for political purposes? Then I guess you have something against obama for doing the samething? Lest we forget about the puppy?

 

[RadiomanATL]

Wow, the article is, like, totally different than your thread title.

If Sarah Palin doesn't want her children to be caught in the crossfire of the rhetoric she actively stokes for a dollar, she shouldn't take them on her public speaking trail.

She actively chose to be a public persona and to go around the country spreading vitriol. She shouldn't expect much sympathy from the people she pisses on regularly, even if she is using her kids as rhetorical human shields.

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Actually, no one has said anything the hundreds of times Palin has done exactly that.

Try another strawman, that one ain't working.

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wow, the article is, like, totally different than your thread title.

If Sarah Palin doesn't want her children to be caught in the crossfire of the rhetoric she actively stokes for a dollar, she shouldn't take them on her public speaking trail.

She actively chose to be a public persona and to go around the country spreading vitriol. She shouldn't expect much sympathy from the people she pisses on regularly, even if she is using her kids as rhetorical human shields.

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Actually, no one has said anything the hundreds of times Palin has done exactly that.

Try another strawman, that one ain't working.

It's always a talking point when you can't give a decent rebuttal isn't it?

 

[Modbert]

You think it's ok to scream abuse at someone carrying a small child. Good to know.

Palin shouldn't of used her kid as a shield. Only one to blame for this is Palin, not the people protesting.

 

[RadiomanATL]

blu (Today), ClosedCaption (Today), Dr Grump (Today), Immanuel (10-22-2010), jillian (10-22-2010), Madeline (10-22-2010), MarcATL (Today), Ozmar (Yesterday), Queen (10-22-2010), Rinata (10-22-2010), strollingbones (10-22-2010), VaYank5150 (Yesterday), YoungLefty (Yesterday)

**** wits each and everyone. Sarah unlike you clowns takes her responsibility as a mother more serious then you clowns do. Hell you asswipes would be calling her a bad mother if she left him at home.

Actually, no one has said anything the hundreds of times Palin has done exactly that.

Try another strawman, that one ain't working.

It's always a talking point when you can't give a decent rebuttal isn't it?

Is that what you are doing here?

OK, nice for you to give a description of your modus operandi.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Actually, no one has said anything the hundreds of times Palin has done exactly that.

Try another strawman, that one ain't working.

It's always a talking point when you can't give a decent rebuttal isn't it?

Is that what you are doing here?

OK, nice for you to give a description of your modus operandi.

Nope you were the one that mentined talking point and strawman bullshit not me.

 

[Stephanie]

boy oh boy, now the lefties HAVE decided where and when a person can take their children.

And they've decided that if you take them to a political rally, then you DESERVE all the abuse that can be heaped on said children..

how bout that one folks.

just think if this had been done to a DEMOCRATS child..this thread would be 1000 pages full of wails and cries about how the POLTICIANS children SHOULD BE LEFT ALONE.

the double standards are Soooooooooooo glaring it's blinding, but so EXPECTED.

 

[RadiomanATL]

It's always a talking point when you can't give a decent rebuttal isn't it?

Is that what you are doing here?

OK, nice for you to give a description of your modus operandi.

Nope you were the one that mentined talking point and strawman bullshit not me.

I didn't say the words "talking point" at all.

Strawman is an accurate description of your statements.

You may now add either "liar" or "moron" to a description of you. I'll let you choose.

 

[Immanuel]

You don't remember when Limbaugh called her the "White House Dog"?

No, I do not but then I never listen to Limbaugh. I don't find him all that entertaining.

Immie

Well, he did. On national TV no less.

Just pointing out that the right can and has been just as nasty.

1) I believe you that he did.

2) I have been on record for a long long time stating that the right is no better than the left.

Immie

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Is that what you are doing here?

OK, nice for you to give a description of your modus operandi.

Nope you were the one that mentined talking point and strawman bullshit not me.

I didn't say the words "talking point" at all.

Strawman is an accurate description of your statements.

OK you did mention strawman bullshit. When you have something better to discuss then trying to say something is a strawman argument when it isn't, then we can talk.