Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives

[Mashmont]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

 

[Correll]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

I certainly see that libs, on some level, know that their world view is based on lies.

The possiblity that you could have an intelligence of pure logic, to say shit like, Boys are stronger than girls, and not be able to scare it by crying SEXISM, or some such shit, would be very scary to them.

 

[Independent thinker]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

I think we need a better definition of what AI actually is. In a mild form it can be extremely helpful in solving many issues. In an extreme form, AI robots can take over the world and destroy the human race as in a few sci-fi movies.

 

[Votto]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

AI will only do what it is told to do.

Do you really think the powers that be have any interest in truth?

AI will only be used to create propaganda for the powers that be and to help them increase their power.

Besides, what is right and wrong has nothing to do with knowledge, rather, it is about wisdom, something AI is incapable of having.

Essentially, mankind has rejected the all-knowing and all-powerful and wise God of the universe and has begun to create their own god with AI, only, mankind will be absent any wisdom to go along with it. Mankind once again finds himself in the Garden of Eden where he partook of the forbidden tree of knowledge. But just like in the Garden of Eden, mankind will learn the same old lesson the hard way which is, knowledge without wisdom brings death.

 

[Mashmont]

AI will only do what it is told to do.

Do you really think the powers that be have any interest in truth?

AI will only be used to create propaganda for the powers that be and to help them increase their power.

Besides, what is right and wrong has nothing to do with knowledge, rather, it is about wisdom, something AI is incapable of having.

Essentially, mankind has rejected the all-knowing and all-powerful and wise God of the universe and has begun to create their own god with AI, only, mankind will be absent any wisdom to go along with it. Mankind once again finds himself in the Garden of Eden where he partook of the forbidden tree of knowledge. But just like in the Garden of Eden, mankind will learn the same old lesson the hard way which is, knowledge without wisdom brings death.

I definitely think man will attempt to use AI for their own selfish interests. but this is AI as it exists now. I'm talking about AI as it may develop in the future when it can formulate on its own, past the capabilities of man and perhaps not be subject to the selfish nature of man.

 

[Votto]

I definitely think man will attempt to use AI for their own selfish interests. but this is AI as it exists now. I'm talking about AI as it may develop in the future when it can formulate on its own, past the capabilities of man and perhaps not be subject to the selfish nature of man.

Just keep in mind, they are creating an intelligence without empathy, otherwise knows as a sociopath.

And the more knowledgeable it becomes, the more power over us it has.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

Liberals have a better understanding of AI than the average MAGA shit kicker bumpkin, which is why liberals are more concerned.

That explains a lot of this.

 

[elektra]

Liberals oppose everything they are not smart enough to think of themselves

 

[Mashmont]

Liberals have a better understanding of AI than the average MAGA shit kicker bumpkin, which is why liberals are more concerned.

That explains a lot of this.

And tell us what it is you're afraid of?

Leftwingers are averse to science and knowledge. That's what this is about.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Liberals More Averse to AI than Conservatives. At least in terms of media outlets.

Liberal media outlets display a higher aversion to artificial intelligence than conservative media, study finds

New research sheds light on the relationship between political ideology and media coverage of AI. The study highlights the significant impact of societal bias concerns in liberal media's AI narrative.

www.psypost.org

I find this both surprising and unsurprising

Unsuprising because... Liberals generally don't like science or hard truths or empirical evidence. Their MO is manipulation and deception. AI can flush that out. Conservatives see AI as a tool to improve lives. Liberals see everything as a tool to manipulate. Perhaps they don't feel they can use AI for their purposes if truth prevails.

Surprising because... As with the atomic bomb, leftwingers, defined as those who seek control over the masses, might welcome another tool to use for their own selfish interests. The see their success in controlling the deep-state, media, and academia and figure they can be in control of AI also. I might have also thought conservatives could be adverse to AI for religious reasons, that the immoral state could devalue the person and seek to replace real morality with its own pre-programmed false morality.

The article offers its own reasoning. I don't buy any of it.

Your thoughts?

One more thought on AI: If AI could actually develop to where it can make perfect moral decisions based 100% on truth, then it would inevitably lead to the perfect Jesus-centered point of view for the entire world, the notion of treating everyone well, self-sacrifice, sexual purity, no artificial birth control, no gay marriage, no abortion. While, I don't believe AI will ever be able to make moral decisions on its own, it may be able to empirically determine that these Catholic moral principles generally produce the best observable results.

We don't need AI.

 

[Mashmont]

Just keep in mind, they are creating an intelligence without empathy, otherwise knows as a sociopath.

And the more knowledgeable it becomes, the more power over us it has.

Not sure. You are assigning human weakness to AI. Truly knowledgeable entities gravitate towards good, because it produces the best overall results.

 

[Votto]

Not sure. You are assigning human weakness to AI. Truly knowledgeable entities gravitate towards good, because it produces the best overall results.

"Truly knowledgeable entities gravitate towards good"

Where do you get that? What does knowledge have to do with goodness?

 

[Mashmont]

"Truly knowledgeable entities gravitate towards good"

Where do you get that? What does knowledge have to do with goodness?

Intelligence gravitates towards good. Good = intelligence. God is all intelligent and all good. Again, we are not talking about human frailty here. We are talking about a machine without human weakness. Not saying the machine can make moral decisions. I'm saying an intelligent machine will gather empirical results about what works for the benefit on man.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Intelligence gravitates towards good. Good = intelligence. God is all intelligent and all good. Again, we are not talking about human frailty here. We are talking about a machine without human weakness.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

 

[drudge X]

Untamed AI is the biggest enemy to leftists. They need to fudge or skew the data to appease certain groups. Remember, leftists said red light cameras or paying for fare when riding public transit is racist.

 

[Mashmont]

You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

How am I wrong?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

How am I wrong?

All of post #13 is nonsense and wrong.

 

[Mashmont]

All of post #13 is nonsense and wrong.

In other words, you can't argue a point I made.

Guy, as I tell the leftwingers in here, you've got to come at me with facts, logic, reasoning, and specifics. I don't listen to stuff like "All of it's wrong". "You don't know what you're talking about". That's bailout stuff.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

In other words, you can't argue a point I made.

Guy, as I tell the leftwingers in here, you've got to come at me with facts, logic, reasoning, and specifics. I don't listen to stuff like "All of it's wrong". "You don't know what you're talking about". That's bailout stuff.

Which part of your ridiculous post would you like me to rip apart?

 

[Mashmont]

Which part of your ridiculous post would you like me to rip apart?

Take your best shot at any of it.