Liberal Media Is Trying To Destroy Football

[mudwhistle]

I think liberals in the media are trying to destroy football as a national pastime.

What do you think?

 

[martybegan]

Not that, but they love it as a distraction from all the other problems we are facing right now.

 

[bodecea]

 

[Mr. H.]

It's being used as a ratings tool. Lavish praise on a gay player - ratings.
Castigate the Redskins moniker- ratings.
Same old shit. Screw Liberals and their media machines.

 

[mudwhistle]

MSESPN focused last week on spousal abuse, Gay players, spanking, changing a teams name, everything but football.

A new football helmet with impact sensing devices can get a player removed from a game even if he hasn't received a concussion.

It's getting to the point that the NFL is more worried about lawsuits than football.

 

[Stephanie]

At this point with the NFL sticking its nose into politics and now trying to become all, political correct, I don't care if it is destroyed. It's also the least diverse jobs out there and not one peep from the Sharpton's, Jacksons and Holders

they've over looked all the thugs they've had in it for years.

 

[Mr. H.]

Without hydrocarbons, football itself would not be playable.
This is fine.

 

[Mad Scientist]

The NFL could go out of business tomorrow for all I care.

 

[Mr. H.]

The NFL could go out of business tomorrow for all I care.

We know you're mad, but are you a real scientist?

NFL is a key player in the economy

USATODAY.com

 

[Mad Scientist]

Mr H., If people weren't spending money on the NFL they'd be:

Spending money on something else.

I read the autobiography of the founder of USA Today AL Neuharth. When it first came out critics called it "McPaper" because of it's big, shiny graphics and lack of writing.

Anyway, one day Al Neuharth got mad at his copy editors because they put a cheerleader with huge tits on the cover. Was he mad because they exploited this woman's natural assets only to sell papers?

No.

He was mad because "her tits were below the fold" and thus no one could see them in the news stand.

 

[Mad Scientist]

And remember that the NFL is a non profit organization yet Roger Goodell makes 44 Million a year.

NFL = Big TV Scam.

 

[Mr. H.]

Mr H., If people weren't spending money on the NFL they'd be:

Spending money on something else.

I read the autobiography of the founder of USA Today AL Neuharth. When it first came out critics called it "McPaper" because of it's big, shiny graphics and lack of writing.

Anyway, one day Al Neuharth got mad at his copy editors because they put a cheerleader with huge tits on the cover. Was he mad because they exploited this woman's natural assets only to sell papers?

No.

He was mad because "her tits were below the fold" and thus no one could see them in the news stand.

$56 billion. For what?

Americans spent a record 56 billion on pets last year - CBS News

 

[ClosedCaption]

MSESPN focused last week on spousal abuse, Gay players, spanking, changing a teams name, everything but football.

Oh dear they spoke about the players and news around the NFL. They never do that must be tha liberals

A new football helmet with impact sensing devices can get a player removed from a game even if he hasn't received a concussion.

It's getting to the point that the NFL is more worried about lawsuits than football.

Oh KNOW, why cant football go back to leather helmets? Dam Liberals, thats why!

 

[Stephanie]

Mr H., If people weren't spending money on the NFL they'd be:

Spending money on something else.

I read the autobiography of the founder of USA Today AL Neuharth. When it first came out critics called it "McPaper" because of it's big, shiny graphics and lack of writing.

Anyway, one day Al Neuharth got mad at his copy editors because they put a cheerleader with huge tits on the cover. Was he mad because they exploited this woman's natural assets only to sell papers?

No.

He was mad because "her tits were below the fold" and thus no one could see them in the news stand.

Sadly, that pretty much sums up shallow the people in this country has become

 

[Ravi]

lmao now ESPN is the liberal media.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I think liberals in the media are trying to destroy football as a national pastime.

What do you think?

Clearly. Liberals are losers in life and hate anything that has winners and loser, like pro sports.

 

[mudwhistle]

Mr H., If people weren't spending money on the NFL they'd be:

Spending money on something else.

I read the autobiography of the founder of USA Today AL Neuharth. When it first came out critics called it "McPaper" because of it's big, shiny graphics and lack of writing.

Anyway, one day Al Neuharth got mad at his copy editors because they put a cheerleader with huge tits on the cover. Was he mad because they exploited this woman's natural assets only to sell papers?

No.

He was mad because "her tits were below the fold" and thus no one could see them in the news stand.

Yeah, they could be sending their cash to Democrat political causes like paying exorbitant taxes, paying $20 for a Big Mac because the union wants a $15 min wage, or donations to the UN. Eliminating wealth concentrations. Spending massive amounts of money on on our energy bills because of investments in alternative energy sources because fossil fuels are evil.

 

[ClosedCaption]

lmao now ESPN is the liberal media.

Annd according to Frank ESPN hates things that has winners and losers...like sports. ESPN hates sports.

 

[mudwhistle]

lmao now ESPN is the liberal media.

Glad I could educate you.

 

[mudwhistle]

lmao now ESPN is the liberal media.

Annd according to Frank ESPN hates things that has winners and losers...like sports. ESPN hates sports.

Sports is supposed to be an escape from all of the garbage in our daily lives. Now it is a major contributor to it.