Liberal Intellectual Elite ("LIE")

[daveman]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

Say, did you ever come up with any reasons for why you're qualified to determine other people's best interests?

 

[daveman]

You're conflating anti-liberal-indoctrination with anti-education.

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

 

[Truthmatters]

Global warming

Evolution

claiming education is liberal indoctrination


Rewriting the history of this country to claim whatever silly assed shit the right wants to claim today.




Your right wing philosophy has to piss in its own eyes to keep believing the crap that keeps the party alive.

 

[geauxtohell]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

Say, did you ever come up with any reasons for why you're qualified to determine other people's best interests?

Strawman.

No matter who is in charge, the basic job of government is to act in the "people's best interest".

Wasn't that why we were told that Iraq was so super-important?

There is a big difference in that and trying to force you to personally conform to my opinions.

 

[Oddball]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

I, for one, welcome any members to the "keep Science pure" club. We can use them.

It would have been nice if they found their sense of outrage during the Intelligent Design debate, but if global warming is what floats their boat, then whatever.

BTW, did you see that the "Climategate" scientists were cleared of any dishonesty?

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty - CNN.com Blogs

I am sure there was a thread about it here, I was just busy that day.

I'll venture to guess that the people who cleared the scientists were in on the conspiracy too.

Speaking of dishonesty, did ole Anderson Cooper happen to point out these little facts?

Lord Oxburgh, a member of the House of Lords, chaired the first investigation. His bias and self-interest is barefaced and makes his appointment shameless in its temerity. He is chairman of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, which believes carbon capture is potentially a trillion dollar industry. As James Delingpole reports “Oxburgh has paid directorships of two renewable energy companies, and is a paid advisor to Climate Change Capital, the Low Carbon Initiative, Evo-Electric, Fujitsu, and an environmental advisor to Deutsche Bank. Last month we revealed that Oxburgh had failed to declare his directorship of GLOBE, an international network of legislators with ties to the Club of Rome.” It’s as if they said who stands to gain the most by whitewashing what happened. The Club of Rome connection is most telling, because I have documented their role in initiating, identifying, and pursuing CO2 as the basis of capitalist destruction of the planet.

Oxburgh was appointed by UEA whose Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Trevor Davies said he believed he would lead the investigation “in an utterly objective way.” We now know this means the objectivity was to ensure the false science claiming CO2 was causing global warming would be objectively maintained.

UEA consulted the Royal Society in selecting Oxburgh. They blithely ignored the fact he is a Fellow of the Society and that it had a track record heavily biased to supporting the false science of the CRU and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC). The Society also ‘recommended’ the eleven academic papers to be considered. When Steve McIntyre, who was instrumental in exposing some of the major scientific falsehoods and deceptions exposed by the emails, asked Oxburgh, “a few simple questions about the terms of reference and documentation of this “inquiry”” he received remarkable answers that he summarized as follows; “The net result, as you will see, is that Oxburgh says that they have no documents evidencing the terms of reference of the inquiry or the selection of the eleven papers, no notes, transcripts or other documentation of the interviews with CRU employees and Oxburgh refused consent for panelists to directly provide me with any notes that they might have taken.”

Climategate Investigations Are Arrogant Insults

Author of the piece:

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

 

[daveman]

Still, you can't ignore that a lot of the rhetoric coming out of the right these days is anti-education.

This isn't a new phenomenon. The right is embracing populism these days and populism has always been leery of elites and professional education.

Populism itself is an interesting study in the human psyche that is basically xenophobia incorporated into political debate. It doesn't align with any economic model (Huey Long and his followers were basically socialists (real socialists, not the 2010 'Obama is a socialist' bullshit). Rather, populism seems to basically attract disaffected voters.

If history is any indicator, populist movements rarely gain any degree of power. Rather they seem to implode upon themselves.

You're conflating anti-liberal-indoctrination with anti-education.

As if you guys think there is any difference.

Was it you and I who had a conversation recently about using your prejudices to prove points?

 

[MIPS]

My theory (call it a conspiracy theory if you wish, since it matters not what you all think of me) is that CrusaderFrank has been less than FRANK about the existence of L.I.E. since according to the Department of Homeland Security (aka The Bureau of 4th Amendment Violators) L.I.E was changed to F.R.A.U.D in January of the year of our Lord 2009 (the REAL our lord not the prick in the Oval Office that just claims to be our lord), I would also add that the distinguished Secretary of Homeland Security (Janet whatshername) has made it clear in certain memos (which of course I cannot share with you peons) that F.R.A.U.D be re-designated as S.C.R.E.W.U as soon as the government printer is able to figure out how to fit that new and improved acronym on Eric Holders business card.

Have a nice day.

 

[daveman]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

Say, did you ever come up with any reasons for why you're qualified to determine other people's best interests?

Strawman.

No, it's not. Truthmatters claimed to personally know what's best for me and my family.

 

[geauxtohell]

You're conflating anti-liberal-indoctrination with anti-education.

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

I am now in graduate school and have yet to hear that once.

Perhaps you have mistaken the shunning of the rather un-academic concept of "American Exceptionalism" in universities for thinking America is the root of all evil.

Then again, you guys don't do nuance so it most likely went over your head.

 

[Oddball]

Lets just remember who hates higher education, science and History?

Let's just remember who peddles hobgoblin strawmen, with bigoted sweeping generalizations.

Still, you can't ignore that a lot of the rhetoric coming out of the right these days is anti-education....

Being in favor of vouchers or outright privatization of the education system is not anti-education, not matter how loudly the DoE, NEA and AFT educrat freaks screech and howl.

 

[geauxtohell]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

I, for one, welcome any members to the "keep Science pure" club. We can use them.

It would have been nice if they found their sense of outrage during the Intelligent Design debate, but if global warming is what floats their boat, then whatever.

BTW, did you see that the "Climategate" scientists were cleared of any dishonesty?

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty - CNN.com Blogs

I am sure there was a thread about it here, I was just busy that day.

I'll venture to guess that the people who cleared the scientists were in on the conspiracy too.

Speaking of dishonesty, did ole Anderson Cooper happen to point out these little facts?

Lord Oxburgh, a member of the House of Lords, chaired the first investigation. His bias and self-interest is barefaced and makes his appointment shameless in its temerity. He is chairman of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, which believes carbon capture is potentially a trillion dollar industry. As James Delingpole reports “Oxburgh has paid directorships of two renewable energy companies, and is a paid advisor to Climate Change Capital, the Low Carbon Initiative, Evo-Electric, Fujitsu, and an environmental advisor to Deutsche Bank. Last month we revealed that Oxburgh had failed to declare his directorship of GLOBE, an international network of legislators with ties to the Club of Rome.” It’s as if they said who stands to gain the most by whitewashing what happened. The Club of Rome connection is most telling, because I have documented their role in initiating, identifying, and pursuing CO2 as the basis of capitalist destruction of the planet.

Oxburgh was appointed by UEA whose Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Trevor Davies said he believed he would lead the investigation “in an utterly objective way.” We now know this means the objectivity was to ensure the false science claiming CO2 was causing global warming would be objectively maintained.

UEA consulted the Royal Society in selecting Oxburgh. They blithely ignored the fact he is a Fellow of the Society and that it had a track record heavily biased to supporting the false science of the CRU and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC). The Society also ‘recommended’ the eleven academic papers to be considered. When Steve McIntyre, who was instrumental in exposing some of the major scientific falsehoods and deceptions exposed by the emails, asked Oxburgh, “a few simple questions about the terms of reference and documentation of this “inquiry”” he received remarkable answers that he summarized as follows; “The net result, as you will see, is that Oxburgh says that they have no documents evidencing the terms of reference of the inquiry or the selection of the eleven papers, no notes, transcripts or other documentation of the interviews with CRU employees and Oxburgh refused consent for panelists to directly provide me with any notes that they might have taken.”

Climategate Investigations Are Arrogant Insults

Author of the piece:

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

I called that one, didn't I? Of course any notion that disagrees with your views is lumped up to the larger Conspiracy Theory.

I have found it is impossible to argue a conspiracy theory with a true believer due to the fact that anything that is inconvenient is simply dismissed.

 

[geauxtohell]

You're conflating anti-liberal-indoctrination with anti-education.

As if you guys think there is any difference.

Was it you and I who had a conversation recently about using your prejudices to prove points?

I have no idea. Could you be more specific?

 

[Truthmatters]

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

I am now in graduate school and have yet to hear that once.

Perhaps you have mistaken the shunning of the rather un-academic concept of "American Exceptionalism" in universities for thinking America is the root of all evil.

Then again, you guys don't do nuance so it most likely went over your head.

That is what happens to idiots who refuse to educate themselves try to make sense of republican talking points

 

[daveman]

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

I am now in graduate school and have yet to hear that once.

Perhaps you have mistaken the shunning of the rather un-academic concept of "American Exceptionalism" in universities for thinking America is the root of all evil.

Then again, you guys don't do nuance so it most likely went over your head.

Again: Was it you and I who had a conversation recently about using your prejudices to prove points?

 

[geauxtohell]

Let's just remember who peddles hobgoblin strawmen, with bigoted sweeping generalizations.

Still, you can't ignore that a lot of the rhetoric coming out of the right these days is anti-education....

Being in favor of vouchers or outright privatization of the education system is not anti-education, not matter how loudly the DoE, NEA and AFT educrat freaks screech and howl.

That's not what I was referring to.

Rather, I was talking about the aversion to the legitimacy and merits of higher education and viewing a Ph.D. as a pejorative matter and not an indication of a degree of expertise in a field.

 

[Oddball]

I, for one, welcome any members to the "keep Science pure" club. We can use them.

It would have been nice if they found their sense of outrage during the Intelligent Design debate, but if global warming is what floats their boat, then whatever.

BTW, did you see that the "Climategate" scientists were cleared of any dishonesty?

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty - CNN.com Blogs

I am sure there was a thread about it here, I was just busy that day.

I'll venture to guess that the people who cleared the scientists were in on the conspiracy too.

Speaking of dishonesty, did ole Anderson Cooper happen to point out these little facts?

Lord Oxburgh, a member of the House of Lords, chaired the first investigation. His bias and self-interest is barefaced and makes his appointment shameless in its temerity. He is chairman of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, which believes carbon capture is potentially a trillion dollar industry. As James Delingpole reports “Oxburgh has paid directorships of two renewable energy companies, and is a paid advisor to Climate Change Capital, the Low Carbon Initiative, Evo-Electric, Fujitsu, and an environmental advisor to Deutsche Bank. Last month we revealed that Oxburgh had failed to declare his directorship of GLOBE, an international network of legislators with ties to the Club of Rome.” It’s as if they said who stands to gain the most by whitewashing what happened. The Club of Rome connection is most telling, because I have documented their role in initiating, identifying, and pursuing CO2 as the basis of capitalist destruction of the planet.

Oxburgh was appointed by UEA whose Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Trevor Davies said he believed he would lead the investigation “in an utterly objective way.” We now know this means the objectivity was to ensure the false science claiming CO2 was causing global warming would be objectively maintained.

UEA consulted the Royal Society in selecting Oxburgh. They blithely ignored the fact he is a Fellow of the Society and that it had a track record heavily biased to supporting the false science of the CRU and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC). The Society also ‘recommended’ the eleven academic papers to be considered. When Steve McIntyre, who was instrumental in exposing some of the major scientific falsehoods and deceptions exposed by the emails, asked Oxburgh, “a few simple questions about the terms of reference and documentation of this “inquiry”” he received remarkable answers that he summarized as follows; “The net result, as you will see, is that Oxburgh says that they have no documents evidencing the terms of reference of the inquiry or the selection of the eleven papers, no notes, transcripts or other documentation of the interviews with CRU employees and Oxburgh refused consent for panelists to directly provide me with any notes that they might have taken.”

Climategate Investigations Are Arrogant Insults

Author of the piece:

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

I called that one, didn't I? Of course any notion that disagrees with your views is lumped up to the larger Conspiracy Theory.

I have found it is impossible to argue a conspiracy theory with a true believer due to the fact that anything that is inconvenient is simply dismissed.

Can't refute the facts of the piece, can you?

 

[Truthmatters]

Let's just remember who peddles hobgoblin strawmen, with bigoted sweeping generalizations.

Still, you can't ignore that a lot of the rhetoric coming out of the right these days is anti-education....

Being in favor of vouchers or outright privatization of the education system is not anti-education, not matter how loudly the DoE, NEA and AFT educrat freaks screech and howl.

Yes it is you fool.

There is a reason public education was started in this country.

It was because private education left the people uneducated.


You people are so history starved its pathetic

 

[Greenbeard]

You're conflating anti-liberal-indoctrination with anti-education.

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

Where were you taught that? High school? Undergrad? Graduate school?

 

[The T]

ahahahahahahahahqah


That shit ai nt going to fly the next time you need to spew hate on science, history and higher edcuation to retain your flawed and failed ideas now is it?

Say, did you ever come up with any reasons for why you're qualified to determine other people's best interests?

Strawman.

No matter who is in charge, the basic job of government is to act in the "people's best interest".

Wasn't that why we were told that Iraq was so super-important?

There is a big difference in that and trying to force you to personally conform to my opinions.

In this form of government? The Government acts at the behest of the people when called upon by them. Not just willy-nilly enacting law for nefarious purposes of Social experimentation based upon political agendas, and control of the people.

That flies in the face of the intent of the founding of this Republic.

 

[Oddball]

You mean like studying evolution in biology classes?

No, like teaching that America is the root of all evil in the world.

Where were you taught that? High school? Undergrad? Graduate school?

Another outstanding nominee.