Let’s take a look at how Minnesota media is reporting today’s arrest of a man facing first-degree drug charges for possessing over 50 pounds of meth—

I don't know that they will prosecute. If they do, the judge may throw out the case on a technicality, or just make up a reason, since the judge is almost certainly an anti-ICE Democrat. All that is assuming there even is a trial. I don't think that he will ever show up for his trial. Why would he?
The ankle bracelet and the bond, maybe? There is really no telling why the Fed stepped in to arrest and deport on a misdemeanor coming out of the courthouse. He was just an easy mark, in a location (coming out after 2nd court appearance) they knew he would be in public, due to the state charges and ankle bracelet and court date, an easy number for their arrest stats.
 
The ankle bracelet and the bond, maybe?
The bracelet can be cut off and I'm sure he rather lose some bail money than serve time. He's not an upstanding citizen who put up his house. The Cartel likely funded his bond. In that case, it would be the cartel's decision if he showed up to court or not.

Is that what we want for our country?
There is really no telling why the Fed stepped in to arrest and deport on a misdemeanor coming out of the courthouse. He was just an easy mark, in a location (coming out after 2nd court appearance) they knew he would be in public, due to the state charges and ankle bracelet and court date, an easy number for their arrest stats.
50 pounds of meth is a misdemeanor?

Yes, it would be easy. It is better for ICE to make easy arrests, because people are less likely to get hurt. Do you want them to only do difficult arrests?

ICE would not have to go into communities, schools, and other family venues and disrupt people's lives if state and local authorities would hand over the worst of the worst, which is who Trump and Homan said they wanted to focus on.

I didn't just make that up. Tom Homan said it right after he was appointed in multiple interviews, and keeps saying it



Many in fact are cooperating. But the Minnesota insurrectionists are more newsworthy, because State and local law enforcement cooperation with federal law enforcement is a dog-bites-man story. Journalists find the riots more interesting.
 
The bracelet can be cut off and I'm sure he rather lose some bail money than serve time. He's not an upstanding citizen who put up his house. The Cartel likely funded his bond. In that case, it would be the cartel's decision if he showed up to court or not.

Is that what we want for our country?

50 pounds of meth is a misdemeanor?

Yes, it would be easy. It is better for ICE to make easy arrests, because people are less likely to get hurt. Do you want them to only do difficult arrests?

ICE would not have to go into communities, schools, and other family venues and disrupt people's lives if state and local authorities would hand over the worst of the worst, which is who Trump and Homan said they wanted to focus on.

I didn't just make that up. Tom Homan said it right after he was appointed in multiple interviews, and keeps saying it



Many in fact are cooperating. But the Minnesota insurrectionists are more newsworthy, because State and local law enforcement cooperation with federal law enforcement is a dog-bites-man story. Journalists find the riots more interesting.

"50 pounds of meth is a misdemeanor?"
No trial, no conviction on the 50 lb of Meth. Being in the country illegally is the misdemeanor, the only thing the feds could arrest him on.
You know the Feds weren't charging him on the meth. The Feds just released another guy (a 12 time convicted felon), that was federally charged on trafficking 10 lb of meth in Minnesota, just because federal prosecutors there are overworked, understaffed and resigning in droves.
 
"50 pounds of meth is a misdemeanor?"
No trial, no conviction on the 50 lb of Meth. Being in the country illegally is the misdemeanor, the only thing the feds could arrest him on.
So, you cannot deport someone for being in the country illegally, because that is just a misdemeanor? Wouldn't that mean nobody could be deported absent another crime?

Which might be workable idea, as an unofficial amnesty that many politicians desperately want, but do not have the courage to vote for. It would work, if not for local law enforcement being ordered by Democrats not to cooperate with ICE to deport the criminals. While not workable, I guess it could still be a popular idea with people who really just don't want illegals deported.
You know the Feds weren't charging him on the meth. The Feds just released another guy (a 12 time convicted felon), that was federally charged on trafficking 10 lb of meth in Minnesota, just because federal prosecutors there are overworked, understaffed and resigning in droves.
Yes, I understand that prosecutors who swore to uphold the law are now resigning because they don't like the president. Or maybe it is more because the left is shaming them for doing what they swore to do.

Suppose the state and the country say they are too busy to prosecute him also. Perfect time to deport him. Unless . . . you really just don't want illegals deported.
 
Last edited:
So, you cannot deport someone for being in the country illegally, because that is just a misdemeanor? Wouldn't that mean nobody could be deported absent another crime?

Which might be workable idea, as an unofficial amnesty that many politicians desperately want, but do not have the courage to vote for. It would work, if not for local law enforcement being ordered by Democrats not to cooperate with ICE to deport the criminals. While not workable, I guess it could still be a popular idea with people who really just don't want illegals deported.

Yes, I understand that prosecutors who swore to uphold the law are now resigning because they don't like the president. Or maybe it is more because the left is shaming them for doing what they swore to do.

Suppose the state and the country say they are too busy to prosecute him also. Perfect time to deport him. Unless . . . you really just don't want illegals deported.
I didn't say you couldn't. Who did? Are you arguing with yourself?

So, drugs and drug dealers are no longer important. Punishing someone that has brought drugs, sold drugs is not important, maybe even killed Americans with their drugs, if you can arrest for a misdemeanor, deport and wait for them to sneak back in later, (probably later the same year) eh? Let see, on one hand you could take them off the street for 10, 20, maybe even 30 years. Or you can deport with no criminal record and hope they do not sneak back in, though we are told deported aliens (especially criminal minded aliens) commonly do sneak back into the country. So, it is better to have them back on the street, after free transportation to visit their homeland? Is that really what you want?

I would rather see them locked up for a long time.
 
Back
Top Bottom