Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,265
- 15,790
- 2,210
Former girlfriend says Clarence Thomas was a binge drinker, porn user - CNN.com
This is a video of his ex girlfriend.
This is a video of his ex girlfriend.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my gosh, a man once looked at porn in the 1980’s!
Take to the streets!
I can't believe they approved his appointment, but with all of this coming out on all these guys lately, I am beginning to look at this from a different perspective.Former girlfriend says Clarence Thomas was a binge drinker, porn user - CNN.com
This is a video of his ex girlfriend.
I can't believe they approved his appointment, but with all of this coming out on all these guys lately, I am beginning to look at this from a different perspective.Former girlfriend says Clarence Thomas was a binge drinker, porn user - CNN.com
This is a video of his ex girlfriend.
Humans are sexual; it is embedded in the deepest, most instinctive and undeniable parts of our brain. Yes, we can control our behavior but our urges frequently win anyway. So legislating sexual behavior is like herding cats. Abuses of power in sexual relationships is another matter, and that is why we have laws about rape, adults (who have an automatic power position) engaging with minors, and those in positions of power using that position to coerce sexual cooperation.
I think we should try to sort out these allegations according to abuse of power/unequal relationships and force.
The flood gates have opened about inappropriate behavior. Clarence Thomas, was that hearing held today, would probably not be on the Supreme Court. But I am asking this question: Did his behavior interfere with his ability to be a good Supreme Court judge? Where does the tsk tsking cross the line into "unfit?" I'm not completely sure.
Explain that more for me, can you?I can't believe they approved his appointment, but with all of this coming out on all these guys lately, I am beginning to look at this from a different perspective.Former girlfriend says Clarence Thomas was a binge drinker, porn user - CNN.com
This is a video of his ex girlfriend.
Humans are sexual; it is embedded in the deepest, most instinctive and undeniable parts of our brain. Yes, we can control our behavior but our urges frequently win anyway. So legislating sexual behavior is like herding cats. Abuses of power in sexual relationships is another matter, and that is why we have laws about rape, adults (who have an automatic power position) engaging with minors, and those in positions of power using that position to coerce sexual cooperation.
I think we should try to sort out these allegations according to abuse of power/unequal relationships and force.
The flood gates have opened about inappropriate behavior. Clarence Thomas, was that hearing held today, would probably not be on the Supreme Court. But I am asking this question: Did his behavior interfere with his ability to be a good Supreme Court judge? Where does the tsk tsking cross the line into "unfit?" I'm not completely sure.
Yes , when it comes to women right issues, of course it does.
I can't believe they approved his appointment, but with all of this coming out on all these guys lately, I am beginning to look at this from a different perspective.
Humans are sexual; it is embedded in the deepest, most instinctive and undeniable parts of our brain. Yes, we can control our behavior but our urges frequently win anyway. So legislating sexual behavior is like herding cats. Abuses of power in sexual relationships is another matter, and that is why we have laws about rape, adults (who have an automatic power position) engaging with minors, and those in positions of power using that position to coerce sexual cooperation.
I think we should try to sort out these allegations according to abuse of power/unequal relationships and force.
The flood gates have opened about inappropriate behavior. Clarence Thomas, was that hearing held today, would probably not be on the Supreme Court. But I am asking this question: Did his behavior interfere with his ability to be a good Supreme Court judge? Where does the tsk tsking cross the line into "unfit?" I'm not completely sure.
Obama was correct:
“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas,” said the presumptive Democratic nominee. “I don’t think that he...” the crowd interrupted with applause. “I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution. I would not have nominated Justice Scalia though I don’t think there is any doubt about his intellectual brilliance. Because he and I just disagree.
It seems Obama was making a remark that answered my question--creepin on Anita Hill was not a factor in whether he was qualified for the position.Obama was correct:
“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas,” said the presumptive Democratic nominee. “I don’t think that he...” the crowd interrupted with applause. “I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution. I would not have nominated Justice Scalia though I don’t think there is any doubt about his intellectual brilliance. Because he and I just disagree.
Hahaha....good one!....like Obama had the experience and knowledge to offer an opinion on it.
It seems Obama was making a remark that answered my question--creepin on Anita Hill was not a factor in whether he was qualified for the position.Obama was correct:
“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas,” said the presumptive Democratic nominee. “I don’t think that he...” the crowd interrupted with applause. “I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution. I would not have nominated Justice Scalia though I don’t think there is any doubt about his intellectual brilliance. Because he and I just disagree.
Hahaha....good one!....like Obama had the experience and knowledge to offer an opinion on it.
dunno. Why do women put up with half the shit they do? I'm feeling particularly grumpy about it because I just discovered that a young woman I knew as a girl--who was raised by an extreme, textbook domestic abuser--went ahead and married another one just like him. And she gets upset sometimes but she "really loves him." What the fuck are you going to do?It seems Obama was making a remark that answered my question--creepin on Anita Hill was not a factor in whether he was qualified for the position.Obama was correct:
“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas,” said the presumptive Democratic nominee. “I don’t think that he...” the crowd interrupted with applause. “I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution. I would not have nominated Justice Scalia though I don’t think there is any doubt about his intellectual brilliance. Because he and I just disagree.
Hahaha....good one!....like Obama had the experience and knowledge to offer an opinion on it.
Just something to keep in mind...Anita Hill followed Thomas when he got a new position in another court. That always bothered me. If it was as bad as she said it was, why would she do that?
dunno. Why do women put up with half the shit they do? I'm feeling particularly grumpy about it because I just discovered that a young woman I knew as a girl--who was raised by an extreme, textbook domestic abuser--went ahead and married another one just like him. And she gets upset sometimes but she "really loves him." What the fuck are you going to do?
I can't believe they approved his appointment, but with all of this coming out on all these guys lately, I am beginning to look at this from a different perspective.
Humans are sexual; it is embedded in the deepest, most instinctive and undeniable parts of our brain. Yes, we can control our behavior but our urges frequently win anyway. So legislating sexual behavior is like herding cats. Abuses of power in sexual relationships is another matter, and that is why we have laws about rape, adults (who have an automatic power position) engaging with minors, and those in positions of power using that position to coerce sexual cooperation.
I think we should try to sort out these allegations according to abuse of power/unequal relationships and force.
The flood gates have opened about inappropriate behavior. Clarence Thomas, was that hearing held today, would probably not be on the Supreme Court. But I am asking this question: Did his behavior interfere with his ability to be a good Supreme Court judge? Where does the tsk tsking cross the line into "unfit?" I'm not completely sure.