Let's indict Obama and Hillary

[john doe 101]

So your counter is you told a lie. Amazing.

No my counter is the other persons post is a lie.

 

[kaz]

True yet because of limitations being what they are yous guys are a little late.

When was Trump's second impeachment, Opie? Funny, I never saw you object to that one

 

[kaz]

Trump spent 8 years making this claim and 5 years investigating it, and even Durham said it never happened and no one should be charged with anything.

Any other stupid ideas you want debunked?

Canadians sure are jealous of Americans. You really want to grow up and be a real country, huh?

 

[Lesh]

The Supreme court more than likely will declare Trump to be not guilty.

Not for state crimes

 

[Lesh]

Democrats allege we have no evidence of Biden Corruption.

Not True says Rep Chip Roy. Time to impeach Biden from his job is now.

Oh well if “Chip Roy “ says it… it must be true

 

[Robert W]

Not for state crimes

You know of no state crimes that the Supreme court has never overturned?

 

[Lesh]

You know of no state crimes that the Supreme court has never overturned?

Enlighten us

 

[AveMarica]

At least you ask questions. Most smart asses do not do that.

Yes strangely no answers from you. I'll try again:

How exactly is Jack Smith a "loyal Democrat"?
What evidence do you have that the Georgia investigation, opened in February 2021, happened only because the prosecutors are loyal Democrats?
Is Christopher Wray a loyal Democrat?

 

[Robert W]

Yes strangely no answers from you. I'll try again:

How exactly is Jack Smith a "loyal Democrat"?
What evidence do you have that the Georgia investigation, opened in February 2021, happened only because the prosecutors are loyal Democrats?
Is Christopher Wray a loyal Democrat?

Great. So let's trade questions. Is that skinny person in your avatar, really you?

As to your own questions, it is my belief that you already formed replies to each of the questions all on your own.

 

[Robert W]

Enlighten us

Well first you confessed. But one example has to be about the 2 amendment. Others were over slaves, and even school issues such as over race.

 

[Lesh]

Well first you confessed. But one example has to be about the 2 amendment. Others were over slaves, and even school issues such as over race.

State crimes that the SC overturned.

Stupid

Go

 

[candycorn]

Townhall Larry O'Connor | Aug 14, 2020

Today's news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith is expected to plead guilty in the Obamagate/Spygate scandal will be tough news for journalists like Jim Acosta.

Just this week, he haughtily intoned on his "network" that President Trump's charge that the Obama campaign spied on his campaign in 2016 was "just not true. That did not happen; it has not been proven."

Well, today's guilty plea from Clinesmith proves it did.

The spying began in early 2016 as a robust opposition research tactic of the Hillary Clinton campaign and transformed into an "insurance policy" to handicap the Trump Administration after his unpredictable victory.

Clinesmith was so intent on spying on Carter Page, an unpaid advisor to the Trump campaign, that he lied to the secret FISA court and doctored an official document to misrepresent that Page had not cooperated with the CIA in past investigations involving Russian espionage.

Page, a retired intelligence officer from the United States Navy and a graduate of the US Naval Academy, had fully cooperated with an earlier investigation involving Russian bad guys. That information surely would have thrown a wrench into the attempts to tap Page's phones, his emails, his text messages, and the phones, emails, and text messages of everyone he corresponded with and everyone they corresponded with.

Now There's No Denying It: Obama's FBI Spied On Trump... Period

If you are conducting surveillance that is not authorized and, in fact, you lied to get the authorization, you are no longer conducting

townhall.com

Comment:
If Trump can be indicted on BS charges, then Obama can be indicted on some real charges.
If this is how the Democrats are going to operate, then make them play by their own rules.
Can you imagine all of the grinding of teeth and caterwauling from the Hollywood/Media hate machine.
And how about Hillary Clinton destroying subpoenaed evidence and her illegal e-mail server?
Why should she be allowed to get away with crimes that other people have gone to prison for?
And how about Col. Yevgeny Vindman who eavesdropped on Trump's phone calls and then reported to Adam Schiff so that Pelosi could have her bogus impeachment.
Make the Dems play by their own rules.

Hmmm...

So you made this thread 12 days ago and no DA anywhere has filed such an indictment; neither has any State AG?

Are they all “RINOs” too?

 

[AveMarica]

Great. So let's trade questions. Is that skinny person in your avatar, really you?

As to your own questions, it is my belief that you already formed replies to each of the questions all on your own.

4th and 6, and he punts...

In other words, you don't have proof of any of the things you said that I asked for proof about.