And yet what was being talked about was:
"The President has his First Amendment right to call out the treasonous left and their propaganda outfit, the MSM."
"The President doesn't have the First Amendment in the capacity as President. The First Amendment is to protect people from the GOVERNMENT. The government doesn't get First Amendment rights."
Now, there doesn't seem to be much, if anything, that defines the difference between a president doing something as a citizen and as president.
en.wikipedia.org
In Trump v. US Roberts said the president couldn't be prosecuted for "exercising core constitutional powers", "powers invested exclusively in him by the Constitution".
The case found that:
"The Court thus concludes that the President is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for conduct within his exclusive sphere of constitutional authority."
"In
Fitzgerald, for instance, the Court concluded that a former President is entitled to absolute immunity from "damages liability for acts within the 'outer perimeter' of his official responsibility.""
So, basically when Trump posts on twitter or Fake Social, his actions are protected by his presidency, because they're acts of his presidency. He's communicating with the people.
Therefore it is NOT protected by the First Amendment, or any of the Bill of Rights because those rights are to prevent infringement from the government and Trump is basically a big part of that government.