Let's all do Trump Treason

U know they don’t end once you take a job in govt

You got to be a real idiot to think that

You do know that a Constitutional Right is a limit on the federal government, right?

So, essentially you have a right because the government is limited from doing something.

And you know when Trump is acting as PRESIDENT, he is PART OF THE ******* GOVERNMENT, right?

When Trump speaks as the President, as opposed to when he's speaking as a private citizen, he doesn't have the protection from the government that his is actually a part of, right?

Especially as he's THE ******* EXECUTIVE. In order for Trump, as President, to lose his right to free speech, it'd have to be TRUMP taking away that right.

Like he's going to do that.
 
You do know that a Constitutional Right is a limit on the federal government, right?

So, essentially you have a right because the government is limited from doing something.

And you know when Trump is acting as PRESIDENT, he is PART OF THE ******* GOVERNMENT, right?

When Trump speaks as the President, as opposed to when he's speaking as a private citizen, he doesn't have the protection from the government that his is actually a part of, right?

Especially as he's THE ******* EXECUTIVE. In order for Trump, as President, to lose his right to free speech, it'd have to be TRUMP taking away that right.

Like he's going to do that.
Yes and state govt via the 14th amendment

The president is also a citizen. Congress can’t make laws violated his first amendment rights

Actually as persistent he has immunity as well
 
Yes and state govt via the 14th amendment

The president is also a citizen. Congress can’t make laws violated his first amendment rights

Actually as persistent he has immunity as well

But we're not talking about him as a citizen. I specifically said as a president.

He has immunity as president to his presidential actions, and his presidential actions are not protected by the Bill of Rights.
 
He made a compelling argument. We had record low UE rates back then, lowest at the time ever for African Americans and the dems hated it

Seems pretty un American
It's "unAmerican" to disagree with Trump?
 
But we're not talking about him as a citizen. I specifically said as a president.

He has immunity as president to his presidential actions, and his presidential actions are not protected by the Bill of Rights.


If we are talking about hiim as president then we are talking about presidential action

But a president is always a citizen
 

"
The president blasted Sanger during a face-to-face two-minute rant after he pressed Trump on why the U.S. was continuing its attack on Iran despite not getting “the political changes” he asked for.



“We’ve had a total victory except like people like you that don’t write the truth. ... I actually think it’s sort of treasonous what you write, but you and The New York Times and CNN I would say are the worst,” Trump berated the reporter."

According to Trump, asking why the US is still attacking Iran is treasonous.

So, let's all ask "Why is the US continuing in Iran?" and be considered treasonous to a guy who has no idea what treason is, what the First Amendment is, what the Constitution is, or anything else for that matter.
Iran thanks the NY Times for its service
 
If we are talking about hiim as president then we are talking about presidential action

But a president is always a citizen
And yet what was being talked about was:

"The President has his First Amendment right to call out the treasonous left and their propaganda outfit, the MSM."

"The President doesn't have the First Amendment in the capacity as President. The First Amendment is to protect people from the GOVERNMENT. The government doesn't get First Amendment rights."

Now, there doesn't seem to be much, if anything, that defines the difference between a president doing something as a citizen and as president.


In Trump v. US Roberts said the president couldn't be prosecuted for "exercising core constitutional powers", "powers invested exclusively in him by the Constitution".

The case found that:

"The Court thus concludes that the President is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for conduct within his exclusive sphere of constitutional authority."

"In Fitzgerald, for instance, the Court concluded that a former President is entitled to absolute immunity from "damages liability for acts within the 'outer perimeter' of his official responsibility.""

So, basically when Trump posts on twitter or Fake Social, his actions are protected by his presidency, because they're acts of his presidency. He's communicating with the people.

Therefore it is NOT protected by the First Amendment, or any of the Bill of Rights because those rights are to prevent infringement from the government and Trump is basically a big part of that government.
 
And yet what was being talked about was:

"The President has his First Amendment right to call out the treasonous left and their propaganda outfit, the MSM."

"The President doesn't have the First Amendment in the capacity as President. The First Amendment is to protect people from the GOVERNMENT. The government doesn't get First Amendment rights."

Now, there doesn't seem to be much, if anything, that defines the difference between a president doing something as a citizen and as president.


In Trump v. US Roberts said the president couldn't be prosecuted for "exercising core constitutional powers", "powers invested exclusively in him by the Constitution".

The case found that:

"The Court thus concludes that the President is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for conduct within his exclusive sphere of constitutional authority."

"In Fitzgerald, for instance, the Court concluded that a former President is entitled to absolute immunity from "damages liability for acts within the 'outer perimeter' of his official responsibility.""

So, basically when Trump posts on twitter or Fake Social, his actions are protected by his presidency, because they're acts of his presidency. He's communicating with the people.

Therefore it is NOT protected by the First Amendment, or any of the Bill of Rights because those rights are to prevent infringement from the government and Trump is basically a big part of that government.
Because the President has the first amendment right to call out members of congress or the media

The fact he’s president doesn’t mean he doesn’t have first amendment rights


Congress couldn’t pass a law saying a person that a president can’t be critical of Congress or media or whoever. That would violate the constitution

Even if argumento, they could, he would be immune
 
15th post
Because the President has the first amendment right to call out members of congress or the media

The fact he’s president doesn’t mean he doesn’t have first amendment rights


Congress couldn’t pass a law saying a person that a president can’t be critical of Congress or media or whoever. That would violate the constitution

Even if argumento, they could, he would be immune

Yeah, it does.

You just don't understand how things work.

But that's hardly ******* surprising seeing how Trump has not ******* clue either.

Get a load of dumbasses following a dumbass and what do you get?
 
Yeah, it does.

You just don't understand how things work.

But that's hardly ******* surprising seeing how Trump has not ******* clue either.

Get a load of dumbasses following a dumbass and what do you get?
Haha no, i do. You for some odd reason don’t think people that work for govt have constitutional rights

Which is weird
 
Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of open hostilities is textbook treason. It is Tokyo Rose level treason.
 
Haha no, i do. You for some odd reason don’t think people that work for govt have constitutional rights

Which is weird
That's not what I said.

I said people who acting as the government do not. When people are not acting as the government, they do.

When Trump is an individual and not doing government things, he has those rights. But when is that? When is he not being the president?
 
Back
Top Bottom