Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

If that's the case, then you can show me the law that Congress passed creating his office that he currently occupies.

Because inferior officers can only serve in an office created by Congress.
All I had to do was ask Google you dumbass. It amazes me how people like you will shill for corruption. Do you get paid? Or are you just morally bankrupt?
Screenshot_20250812-130717_Google.webp
 
Trump should be in prison for his many, many crimes. But making friends with the district attorney and later mayor was probably one of the smartest moves he ever made.

This ensured Trump would never be tried in criminal court as he should have been. His prosecutor/mayor friend protected him, and so all Trump has ever had to do when caught breaking the law is pay a fine for his crimes.

So his crimes became bolder and bolder. That's what happens. Moral hazard.

In this case, Trump commmitted fraud. Big fraud. And he was caught and was fined when he should be in jail.

So this is a vindictive nuisance case because Trump wants to punish anyone who exposes him to the world for exactly what he is.
1755030439411.webp



.
 
All I had to do was ask Google you dumbass. It amazes me how people like you will shill for corruption. Do you get paid? Or are you just morally bankrupt?View attachment 1148424
This -- Here. Is why I have most dimocrap FILTH on ignore.

This POS isn't the least bit interested in anything you have to say (type) it only wants to annoy you, to get you to run in circles, to Triple-Dog-Dare you, to taunt you, to get you to say or do something that will get in trouble with You-Know-Who so they can mass-complain and maybe get you suspended........

They bring nothing to the table anyway. Just childish, juvenile reasoning (or lack thereof, actually) taunts and mostly -- Lies.

You could put every single dimocrap scum in here on ignore and not miss damned thing.

Half of them are either 'bots or paid-posters anyway
 
Still doesn’t answer the question.

Where is the law that establishes the office that Ed Martin is occupying.
I just showed it to you dumbass. The AG has the right to appoint inferior officers like special attorneys. That's just the way it is. Get used to it. It's just an investigation, what are you afraid of?
 
This -- Here. Is why I have most dimocrap FILTH on ignore.

This POS isn't the least bit interested in anything you have to say (type) it only wants to annoy you, to get you to run in circles, to Triple-Dog-Dare you, to taunt you, to get you to say or do something that will get in trouble with You-Know-Who so they can mass-complain and maybe get you suspended........

They bring nothing to the table anyway. Just childish, juvenile reasoning (or lack thereof, actually) taunts and mostly -- Lies.

You could put every single dimocrap scum in here on ignore and not miss damned thing.

Half of them are either 'bots or paid-posters anyway
Thank you, I have to believe that I have exposed him or it. It will run you in circles for days with inferior logic . It claimed at one time that it was not a Democrat LOL
 
Yep you fucked around and found out. Watch out for that Wrecking Ball! Hahaha
 
I just showed it to you dumbass. The AG has the right to appoint inferior officers like special attorneys. That's just the way it is. Get used to it. It's just an investigation, what are you afraid of?
You didn’t. You’re little screen cap of a google search has no laws cited.

Let’s see the law.
 
You didn’t. You’re little screen cap of a google search has no laws cited.

Let’s see the law.
Oh my God I'm not going to do all this work for you. ******* figure it out yourself you moron leftist Democrat. The AG has the right to appoint a special attorney. Get used to it
 
Oh my God I'm not going to do all this work for you. ******* figure it out yourself you moron leftist Democrat. The AG has the right to appoint a special attorney. Get used to it
I did the work. There is no law.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Are you just going to get this over and admit you’re talking out your ass?
 
I did the work. There is no law.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Are you just going to get this over and admit you’re talking out your ass?
Actually the link was on the AI generation. Did you not see it?
 
Yep. Did you see where the AI cited any law? Because it didn’t.
Well why don't you show me where it's against the law for her to appoint a special attorney. Oh wait you can't. You are so full of shit LOL and stupid. I trust AI Google a lot more than I trust you for good reason
 
I did the work. There is no law.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. Are you just going to get this over and admit you’re talking out your ass?
Well then if there is no law then I win and we are free and clear to appoint a special attorney you dumb shit!
 
Well then if there is no law then I win and we are free and clear to appoint a special attorney you dumb shit!
There is no law granting the AG the ability appoint a special attorney as an inferior officer.
 
15th post
I am not going to download your file. So AI and Google are lying? Notice where it says as outlined in the appointments Clause of the US Constitution . You know you're starting to look pretty bad Mariner Are you a bot?
Its Aileen Cannon’s decision that dismissed Jack Smith’s case.

Just because Congress can give the AG the authority to appoint an inferior officer doesn’t mean they have given them authority to do so.

If Congress has given the AG the authority to appoint a special attorney as an inferior officer, there would be a law saying so.
 
Back
Top Bottom