My belief is that life begins at conception, giving you 20 weeks off of that just makes me look stupider than you. Put whatever numbers you feel necessary to obsess over into the question and explain what, medical or scientifically, is different about a baby just because the mother wants it? Is there some sort of chemical her body releases that changes that child into a real human?
And that's the difference between science and hick. Your belief doesn't mean crap. Your believe is centered on magical thinking because it makes you feel good. It has no biologic basis whatsoever. Eggs have human genetic non-viable material. Zygotes have human genetic non-viable material.
Strange, I don't recall using the word viable, can you show me where I used it in such a way to make anything you said anything less than an attempt to refrain the argument on your terms? I would like to quote from the OP link, which you, obviously, did not read.
Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe thatÂ’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesnÂ’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.
The point should be obvious, even to you. I doubt it is, but it should be.
As to the question I now understand was your original that I missed: what biologically changes just because a woman wants it? Nothing. No one has made that claim except you.
But it's still the woman's right to choose what to do with her body and the non-viable tissue inside her. Not you.
We finally get to the truth, yet the same doctor that will happily abort a fetus at 35 weeks, yet fight tooth and nail to save a baby of 30 weeks if it is born premature. And, somehow, I am the one that is confused when I point out the double standard.
You have provided absolutely no evidence to back up your assertion that a baby is not human, all you can do is post pictures of acorns and ask me if they are fungi. Until you provide me with evidence, beyond your simple assertion, that the definition of human needs something more than I give it, perhaps a soul that is added after said human starts to breathe, you are not doing anything to convince anyone that passed 5th grade biology.
I don't care if people think I got through fifth grade, I am making a point about the hypocrisy of the pro abortion side of the debate. If you had actually read the pro abortion link in the OP you would have seen that all along, and not bothered to try and reframe this into a debate about semantics.
You do remember learning that tadpoles are frogs, don't you?
Except babies are humans. You can't even get basic terminology down right. You think a clump of cells is a baby. Moronic. You think the developmental process is magical. Moronic. Now you're talking about souls in a conversation of biology and physiologic changes? MORONIC. What part of 5th grade biology references souls? I must have missed that chapter. Can you clarify your magical thinking?
Now that I pointed out how absurd your thought process is you are attempting to make it seem like I am the one that believes in magic? How is it magical thinking to insist that all stages human development are part of being human? Is humanity defined by the ability to breathe air?
Do YOU remember learning about tadpoles and frogs? Babies are young humans. Tadpoles are young frogs. What's this?
Is that a frog? Is it a tree? Is it a baby? You're really not good at this game.
There you go again. Is a premature baby human?
If yes, why is a fetus at the same stage of development not human simply because it is still inside a mother's womb?
What is the magical difference between them that makes one human and the other not? How am I guilty of magical thinking in my belief that human is not something that occurs after birth?
Apologies, you use words like magical, and soul, and "pre-programmed" which is essentially the same thing as potential. Not yet programmed.
I used the word soul? Where? Are you confusing me with your smarter, yet still idiot, brother?
Are you trying to tell me that intestinal flora is not necessary to human life? That every doctor on the planet is wrong, and that you are the only person on the entire Earth that understands the WAY THINGS WORK?
Why don't I believe that?
Because you're a moron, as demonstrated countless times in this thread. Babies don't start with bacteria in their guts, and they're ok. We can kill all the bacteria in our gut with antibiotics, and we're just fine. They help. They're not required. If you disagree, support your claim. Provide evidence that shows people will die without gut bacteria. You should have stopped when you acknowledged your shortcomings.
I really do not have the education, or the time to educate myself enough, to refute that statement. I will, however, point out that a Google search brought up
this paper which shows differently.
What, specifically, is the difference between what you says is a viable, yet non human, fetus, and a human. You expecting me to believe that expelling fluid form the lungs makes us human, is almost as absurd as rdean spouting his 6% statistic every time I challenge him on something. On top of that, it would mean that people using liquid ventilation are no longer human, something I do not believe.
Wow you can't follow this conversation at all, can you? No one said that expelling lung fluid makes us human. You asked what changes make a fetus a baby, and I listed that as one of the many physiologic changes. You continue to show you have no capacity to keep your vocabulary straight. Baby, fetus, human, and viable all mean the same thing in your limited hick mind. And then you go on to expound your stupidity with a claim about "liquid ventilation," which by the way is not a thing outside of sci-fi movies. Here's the bottom line: viability in and of itself is its own marker. The way we hit that marker is by developing organs until viability is reached. It's a process. One you don't seem to understand because the idea of a continuum of events blows your mind.
That process continues after birth, yet babies are human, and fetuses are not. Yet, somehow, the fact that I am completely unaware of the magical change that happens at birth to make a non human into a human, and the additional you are incapable of articulating it, proves I am the one that believes in magic.
It must be nice to be you.
So in summary:
you have no grasp of the basic vocabulary related to this issue
therefore you have no understanding of the processes
because you lack understanding, you find magical other reasons for your blind beliefs
you use words like magic and soul
you don't understand the continuum of fetal development but try to draw conclusions anyway
you liken fetuses to electronics
you think humans are parasites
Given all these moronic beliefs you've spouted in this thread alone, perhaps you should take this opportunity to bow out, realizing you have a laughable small understanding of the topic, whereby your imagination fills in the ample wholes in understanding.
What makes my belief that humanity is not based on location moronic?
Explain it to me and prove how smart you are.