Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
As to the lingering problem Maddow mentioned that is the already "married" couples with, I guess legitimate licenses even though the interim law was that state's get to decide and always have... Perhaps the Court will punt that issue back to each individual state to vote on or legislate a fix for. However, that won't supersede any language that ultimately declares that the "yes or no" question is and always was up to each state's electorate. States would be well advised in-advance to have some type of ballot measure that says "this law will preserve those marriages but permit none further". If appealed, the Supreme Court would simply cite its 2015 Decision reiterating that it is up to the individual states.
That ruling cannot be correct. Marriage is a purely private Act and natural right. It is Only commuted Public, for full faith and credit purposes. There can be no collusion or conspiracy to subvert our supreme law of the land, merely for sake of the subjective value of Individual morals.
Oh, if only there was no Windsor 2013 and the 56 times in it that was reiterated that marriage is the jurisdiction of the states.
And if only children weren't intimately involved in the marriage contract...then it would be a perfectly sterile legal world as you are trying to portray.
They have a right to a mother and a father. They have an innate right. And they have to come first in consideration because they cannot vote to affect their destiny.