Apparently you know nothing about TCR.Never. I pointed you to the IPCC report, and what it says about doubling the CO2 from the pre industrial levels.
1degC is not even in the range.
So we can ignore your verbose and repeated falsehoods.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Apparently you know nothing about TCR.Never. I pointed you to the IPCC report, and what it says about doubling the CO2 from the pre industrial levels.
1degC is not even in the range.
So we can ignore your verbose and repeated falsehoods.
I have provided multiple citations and a link to the IPCC's report itself.Never. I pointed you to the IPCC report, and what it says about doubling the CO2 from the pre industrial levels.
1degC is not even in the range.
So we can ignore your verbose and repeated falsehoods.
Yes. I wish you would. Because you have no concept of TCR and ECR and the difference between the two or what the significance of the difference between the two is.Did ya read the IPCC yet?
And you need to look up the range of warming from doubling of CO2 since preindustrial era levels in the IPCC, so that you can stop embarrassing yourself.Yes. I wish you would. Because you have no concept of TCR and ECR and the difference between the two or what the significance of the difference between the two is.
No we aren't.
Stop making up stupid shit, Frank.
ORSo there's so AGW Sixth Extinction?? Did you check with Xi and the home office?
Apparently you do not understand the physics of GHG's. It's an instantaneous effect. It's the only warming that can be quantified by physics; by science. So what "science" do you suppose they are basing their ranges upon?And you need to look up the range of warming from doubling of CO2 since preindustrial era levels in the IPCC, so that you can stop embarrassing yourself.
What do you suppose those ranges are based upon? What's the minimum number in the IPCC's TCR range based upon?And you need to look up the range of warming from doubling of CO2 since preindustrial era levels in the IPCC, so that you can stop embarrassing yourself.
I have. And I can discuss it. Can you?And you need to look up the range of warming from doubling of CO2 since preindustrial era levels in the IPCC, so that you can stop embarrassing yourself.
You certainly don't. Is now the time when you argue you aren't an expert and rely upon experts? Because if so, you are admitting that you aren't qualified to argue anything at all. Yet you continue to do so. You're like Georgie Porgie.OR
You don't know what you're talking about.
yawnYou certainly don't. Is now the time when you argue you aren't an expert and rely upon experts? Because if so, you are admitting that you aren't qualified to argue anything at all. Yet you continue to do so. You're like Georgie Porgie.
How much of the IPCC's projected temperature range is due to the instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2 and how much is due to feedback?yawn
You aren't going to whine your way into being correct.
Irrelevant.How much of the IPCC's projected temperature range is due to the instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2 and how much is due to feedback?
And if you tell me to look it up I will say I have. The answer is 1C of instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2 and 3.5 C of feedbacks.
Do you have a different answer?
We are talking about TCR. The instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2. The IPCC has it at 1C per doubling of CO2. It's in their reports. I linked to it. Why do you keep denying their own report?Irrelevant.
But I know the hard estimates for ECS range from 2.5degC to 4degC.
If you have a problem with that, don't whine to me. Publish your science. Until then, don't waste your time.
No, you are. I am laughing at deniers thinking they outsmarted the scientists.We are talking about TCR. The instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2. The IPCC has it at 1C per doubling of CO2. It's in their reports. I linked to it. Why do you keep denying their own report?
TCR is the GHG effect, dummy. Clearly you don't understand what you are talking about.No, you are. I am laughing at deniers thinking they outsmarted the scientists.
Let's be clear.
Nah, I will defer to the experts, while you guys sit here where you belong and pull each other's taffy.TCR is the GHG effect, dummy. Clearly you don't understand what you are talking about.
Everything above 1C per doubling of CO2 is considered to be feedbacks. Say it with me.
The answer is 1C of instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2 and 3.5 C of feedbacks.Irrelevant.
But I know the hard estimates for ECS range from 2.5degC to 4degC.
If you have a problem with that, don't whine to me. Publish your science. Until then, don't waste your time.