It is odd that just ending tax payer funding for a specific group banning gays from adoptions DUE TO SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, is bad and naughty and a first amendment violation..But on the same thread, many mouth breathers talked about how muslim adoptions should be BANNED ALTOGETHER!! And not one right winger applied that same first amendment objection to that silly ass remark. Double standard, much? Taxpayer money is not supposed to favor one group over the other, or fund religious groups that have any sort of political agenda, such as banning gays, who are taxpayers and would in effect be supporting a group that wants to DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THEM.
Nope. The objection of Muslims being able to adopt isn’t about their religion, it’s about their way of life. No different than objecting to sex criminal or mentally ill person from adopting.
What do you actually know, about how Muslims live their life? There are a billion plus Muslims in the world. I know maybe 6, and I have gotten to know them because they run this small garage I take my car to for oil changes, minor work, inspections...and they are wonderful people. They refused to even charge me once when all they had to do was repair a flat, saying I was one of their best customers. Awesome people. Whoever, and however, these fine folks were brought up is just fine with me, and people like you who judge all muslims by the actions of such a tiny few, are the ones obviously brought up in a household where bias, bigotry and racism were allowed, maybe even encouraged, since you such a hateful, bigoted stooge.
