Legal Experts say Fani has ruined her case against Trump!

No matter what happens, the DA’s office has egg on its face. The longer the trial goes on the worse it gets. I can’t see the DA’s office doing anything to keep the circus alive.

The ignorance and stupidity of the Trump Cult knows no bounds;.

The only disgrace here is that Trump never denies he did any of the things he's accused of doing, just that it wasn't illegval because he was President when did it. That didn't work for Nixon and it won't work for the guy who committed his crimes on national television either.
 
I can't see them not backing backing down. The one thing about prosecutors is they don't say "Aw Schucks", just ask the guy who has been put on trial seven times because juries keep deadlocking or higher courts keep throwing out the verdict.






Bullshit. Having an adult relationship isn't grounds for dismissal. Especially after two other lawyers were approached for the same job and refused it out of fear of MAGAts threatening their family.

The other attorneys refused because there is no case.
 
The other attorneys refused because there is no case.

But that's not what they said.


Willis tried to hire two other outside attorneys before she offered the work to Wade. Willis first approached Roy Barnes, a former Georgia governor, to serve as senior counsel in the Trump prosecution, but Barnes declined, According to CBS News, Gabe Banks, a former federal prosecutor, was next, and also turned down Willis’ offer. Both men are reported to have been concerned about Trump supporters’ threats to their personal and family safety, with Barnes asking, “Hypothetically speaking, do you want a bodyguard following you around for the rest of your life?"
 
Numbnuts Wade cheated on his wife. So what makes you think fani didn't see other men and how would her father know she wasn't fucking other men?
Because at the time he was LIVING with Wade. Specifically 2019. While the other witness said she was dating another man. A witness by the way that went on the stand and said she quit her job. Only to admit under cross-examination that she actually was given the choice between resigning and being fired for cause.

The fact of the matter is that the burden of proof is NOT on Willis. It's on the lawyer. So is it possible... perhaps. Is it likely? Less so.
 
Because at the time he was LIVING with Wade. Specifically 2019. While the other witness said she was dating another man. A witness by the way that went on the stand and said she quit her job. Only to admit under cross-examination that she actually was given the choice between resigning and being fired for cause.

The fact of the matter is that the burden of proof is NOT on Willis. It's on the lawyer. So is it possible... perhaps. Is it likely? Less so.
All that‘s necessary is the appearance of misconduct. And when a D.A. Is having an affair with a man whom she pays hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds, and then she personally benefits from that with trips to Aruba and cruises, it appears that way.

Someone with such poor judgment has no business being a D.A.
 
All that‘s necessary is the appearance of misconduct. And when a D.A. Is having an affair with a man whom she pays hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds, and then she personally benefits from that with trips to Aruba and cruises, it appears that way.

Someone with such poor judgment has no business being a D.A.

“ In applying these standards, the reversal of a conviction due to such a conflict of interest requires more than a "`theoretical or speculative conflict.'" Lyons v. State. An actual conflict of interest must be involved.” Whitworth v. State, 275 Ga. App. 790, 793 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)


No, you are wrong. That is NOT the standard in Georgia.
 
All that‘s necessary is the appearance of misconduct. And when a D.A. Is having an affair with a man whom she pays hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds, and then she personally benefits from that with trips to Aruba and cruises, it appears that way.

Someone with such poor judgment has no business being a D.A.

You have yet to prove who she was sleeping with had any effect on how the case was presented to a grand jury. Did they come up with better ideas in bed?
 
MAGA Media rots the brain. Be careful with that shit.
She’ll be removed for, at the minimum, for the appearance of misconduct. If she weren’t a member of a Dem protected class, she would also be charged for misuse of campaign funds.

Also, half my brain could rot away, and I’d still be smarter than that DIE, Soros-funded D.A.
 
Greedy sex-starved Fani Willis likely ruined her case with Trump, experts say.

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said Tuesday that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis may have destroyed her election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

Willis appointed her romantic partner Nathan Wade as special prosecutor in the case, which a Trump co-defendant alleges is a conflict of interest because of benefits she received based on their relationship. Judge Scott McAfee will consider a motion Thursday to disqualify Willis based on the allegations.

I think her problems continue to multiply,” Honig asserted. “So the allegation that several defendants, including Donald Trump, have made is that there‘s a conflict of interest, that she has been in this personal romantic relationship with one of the outside people brought in to prosecute this case. She has since admitted that that‘s true, and that there was an intermingling of finances that creates a conflict of interest.”

Wade purchased airline tickets to Miami and San Francisco in Willis’ name, according to bank statements contained in a filing in his divorce case.

“Yesterday, there was a hearing, a zoom hearing that we were able to see where the DA‘s office said, ‘Judge, you should just throw this out. There‘s not even a need to hold a hearing.’ Well, the judge said, ‘I disagree. There‘s some serious disputed facts here. Therefore, we‘re going to have a hearing on Thursday.’ That‘s going to be really interesting to watch, but that is going to be a really problematic proceeding for the DA,” Honig said.

CNN is all in for Trump, their analyst lied.
 
She’ll be removed for, at the minimum, for the appearance of misconduct. If she weren’t a member of a Dem protected class, she would also be charged for misuse of campaign funds.

Also, half my brain could rot away, and I’d still be smarter than that DIE, Soros-funded D.A.
Not according to applicable case law. But I guess your brain doesn't need anything that Fox doesn't tell you.
 
Because at the time he was LIVING with Wade. Specifically 2019. While the other witness said she was dating another man. A witness by the way that went on the stand and said she quit her job. Only to admit under cross-examination that she actually was given the choice between resigning and being fired for cause.

The fact of the matter is that the burden of proof is NOT on Willis. It's on the lawyer. So is it possible... perhaps. Is it likely? Less so.
Numbnuts people slip around daughters don't tell their daddy's who they are fucking
 
She more than likely will be removed.
She’s caused the DIE movement enough embarrassment as it is. Add in that she put the entire case at risk, and she’s gone baby, gone.

Such a shame, really. Here is a girl who was raised by a racist father*, and as a result was told that any failure she has was due to whitey. And success she had was due to her own brilliance and skill set - despite whitey. The truth of course is that she was advantaged by her color, and got to where she is because of it. We all heard her last week - an ordinary person, very defiant and entitled, unable to speak English properly, and showing very poor judgement.

She really blew it. She believed she got to where she was due to her own brilliance, and now she’s exposed what a DIE and AA candidate is.

*member of the Black Panthers who dated Angela Davis
 
She more than likely will be removed.
This is much more likely. And again, I've seen the hearings.

Willis will not be removed. There is simply not enough evidence to establish an actual conflict of interest. This will lead to all of you screaming that it's simply more proof that the judicial system has it in for Trump.

Meanwhile. In the real world that judge will have made his decision on the applicable law. And on and on we go.
 
This is much more likely. And again, I've seen the hearings.

Willis will not be removed. There is simply not enough evidence to establish an actual conflict of interest. This will lead to all of you screaming that it's simply more proof that the judicial system has it in for Trump.

Meanwhile. In the real world that judge will have made his decision on the applicable law. And on and on we go.
You don’t need to establish it. You just need the appearance of it. And if it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Those two knew they were dangerously near the line of misconduct, if not outright over it, and neither one of them (law school graduates who know about the importance of evidence) thought to document these “cash repayments”? Ha.

She was using him for sex, and he was using her to keep the big bucks coming in. They deserve each other.
 
You don’t need to establish it. You just need the appearance of it. And if it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Those two knew they were dangerously near the line of misconduct, if not outright over it, and neither one of them (law school graduates who know about the importance of evidence) thought to document these “cash repayments”? Ha.

She was using him for sex, and he was using her to keep the big bucks coming in. They deserve each other.
Lisa was my link in any way unclear to you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top