Leftists

[ThisIsMe]

There is no scripture as he quoted it.

You are correct, there is no scripture AS he quoted it, but he is still not wrong. It does say you should be put to death, and stoning was a common method of punishing sexual sins. So, while he didnt quote the scripture verbatim, he wasnt wrong with the premise. If you want to argue the phraseology, sure you can do that, but his relaying of the intent of the scripture was not wrong.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Perhaps...didn't know him very well but its well known that his candidate for President mocks all three.

Here is where you tell us that it is perfectly Christian and the height of family values to bang porn stars, pay hush money to them, father 5 kids by 3 different wives etc...

Go ahead and amuse us all.

You have obviously never read the Bible.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

You have obviously never read the Bible.

Guys like Jobe and Noah had a hella lota wives and kids

 

[candycorn]

You have obviously never read the Bible.

Trump obviously never took his marriage vows seriously.

More Christianity! Gotta love it!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

With all of your hate toward Charlie Kirk can you explain what your political views are based on?

His were based on the following:

Jesus and Christianity
Family
Love of country

What exactly would you disagree with there?

I barely even know who Kirk is. Thus, there's no reason to hate him, magafuck.

Jesus and Christianity - no interest whatsoever. Keep personal beliefs to one's self.
Family - okay
Love of country - okay

What exactly would you disagree with there?

The first one.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

That is reasonable.HOWEVER today's democrat is being groomed
for outright Hatred.With literally no cause explained.

Wait a tick. Are you saying you really believe every person that may vote for left-wing candidates have absolutely zero causes to complain about?

Just constant use of Gaslighting and or Brainwashing to
the most outrageous degree.Our Country can not exist with such
unbelievable Unamerican mindsets that Live to take down
who and what Loves this Country.

That doesn't really mean anything.

 

[Winco]

You have obviously never read the Bible.

Wait....What.

Are you a Bible Expert?
Do you know the Bible more than trump?



Setting you up bub.
Please take the trap.

 

[hondo 50]

As a Christian....

right!

 

[Mac1958]

"Jesus and Christianity"?

From a Trumpster?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Perhaps...didn't know him very well but its well known that his candidate for President mocks all three.

Here is where you tell us that it is perfectly Christian and the height of family values to bang porn stars, pay hush money to them, father 5 kids by 3 different wives etc...

Go ahead and amuse us all.

So you’re reason for hating God, Family and Country and being happy he was killed is because you don’t like Trump.

You hate Trump so bad it’s what keeps you from being a good person. Seems counter productive.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

"Show me your papers" = American in your world. Not mine.

It’s anti-American to have a sovereign nation?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I barely even know who Kirk is. Thus, there's no reason to hate him, magafuck.

Jesus and Christianity - no interest whatsoever. Keep personal beliefs to one's self.
Family - okay
Love of country - okay


The first one.

So if you don’t like that what do you replace it with? What in your life takes the place of God.

 

[candycorn]

So you’re reason for hating God, Family and Country and being happy he was killed is because you don’t like Trump.

Since none of those things are remotely true, I'll just assume you're on crack.

You hate Trump so bad it’s what keeps you from being a good person. Seems counter productive.

Whatever gets you through the night there sport.

Kirk's candidate embodied--according to you--none of what he allegedly stood for. This isn't conjecture; it's a fact.

 

[pknopp]

I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment," he said.

Charlie is correct. Change 'guns' to 'cars', 'knives', 'fire', or even 'bathtubs' and it's still true. A few people fall in bathtubs and crack their heads open every year. Should we ban bathtubs?

I'm not arguing to ban anything. Ask his kids today if they feel "it's worth it"?

It's an uncaring defeatist statement.

 

[pknopp]

All Christians cherry-pick what to accept and not accept in the bible. That said, Jesus did say something to the effect of "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone." So, he advocated the ending of stoning as a punishment. He saw its raw brutality and didn't agree with it.
Almost all Jews have ceased abiding by the ancient brutal laws of the Old Testament.
I always keep in mind that all three Abrahamic religions were written in an era that so primitive and steeped in superstition that it even preceded the Dark Ages.
It doesn't matter whether he quoted his scripture correctly or not, but how he always behaved toward those with differing opinions. He was polite and let them speak freely on their side of issues.
The left can't even begin to have some measure of decency as all we hear out of it is hatred, threats and lies, calling those that disagree, Fascists, Nazis and a threat to Democracy, which is exactly what the left is, a threat to Democracy in that it hates to allow opposing views and would arrest those that oppose them if they could.

So his statement was outdated and narrow.

 

[pknopp]

You are correct, there is no scripture AS he quoted it, but he is still not wrong. It does say you should be put to death, and stoning was a common method of punishing sexual sins. So, while he didnt quote the scripture verbatim, he wasnt wrong with the premise. If you want to argue the phraseology, sure you can do that, but his relaying of the intent of the scripture was not wrong.

Stoning was for adultery and he was never about to go there.

 

[pknopp]

It’s anti-American to have a sovereign nation?

It's against everything this country and the Constitution stands for.

 

[Eman623]

I'm not arguing to ban anything. Ask his kids today if they feel "it's worth it"?

It's an uncaring defeatist statement.

And if Charlie had died in a car crash, should I ask his kids if that was worth it?

Charlie made a rational, hard-headed, factual statement. We accept some number of gun deaths exactly like we accept some number of vehicular deaths, stabbing and throat sliced deaths, house fire deaths, and slip-and-fall-in-the-bathtub deaths. Because banning cars, knives, stoves and bathtubs would be crazy.

 

[pknopp]

And if Charlie had died in a car crash, should I ask his kids if that was worth it?

Would be silly to ask them some random question.

Charlie made a rational, hard-headed, factual statement. We accept some number of gun deaths exactly like we accept some number of vehicular deaths, stabbing and throat sliced deaths, house fire deaths, and slip-and-fall-in-the-bathtub deaths. Because banning cars, knives, stoves and bathtubs would be crazy.

No, he made an uncaring statement concerning the lives (many of them children) of those dead by gunfire.

We should never accept the death of so many being inevitable. There are things we can do but sadly will not IMO because people would rather poke people in the eye as opposed to address our issues.

Would someone be condemned for going up to his kids and saying "Your dad is dead as a trade off for the country being armed"?

That's what he did to the many facing that.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So if you don’t like that what do you replace it with? What in your life takes the place of God.

Freedom.