Leftists decisively end the canard the violence came from the right

[Camp]

Remember the good old days when trump protesters and hecklers were sucker punched, women where shoved around, teenage girls were pepper sprayed and the fake group, bikers for trump vowed to protect the rallies? Those were the good old days weren't they.

 

[NightFox]

There has been a long term serious effort to screw up education for all but the wealthy for decades son.

Yep and unfortunately the "progressive" gub'mint worshipers have done a fairly thorough job of it too.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Of course liberals would rather trash a campus and physically assault people, rather than listen to what a gay Jew that likes black men has to say. The Jew hating, homophobic, fascist leftists will do as they are told. Time to lock up the violent animals and throw away the key.

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes than any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

 

[Fenton Lum]

There has been a long term serious effort to screw up education for all but the wealthy for decades son.

Yep and unfortunately the "progressive" gub'mint worshipers have done a fairly thorough job of it too.

Your corporate state has son.

 

[JBond]

So, have you righties shot anyone today?

No?

Well, that's a change.

Not yet. Where are you planning today's riot?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Of course liberals would rather trash a campus and physically assault people, rather than listen to what a gay Jew that likes black men has to say. The Jew hating, homophobic, fascist leftists will do as they are told. Time to lock up the violent animals and throw away the key.

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

I agree. That is why Americans have tossed out the failed leftist agenda. They have seen through the bull shit lies and have decided a change was needed.

You clearly do not see, you're still stuck in your partisanshithead fog.

You bipartisanly want to shut down non-leftist speech and support doing it with violence, got it. Thanks for clarifying in case anyone hadn't caught on to how bigoted and hate filled you are

Your own hopeless partisanshithead perceptual reality leaves you unable to understand that not everyone buys into that nonsense.

 

[NightFox]

Of course liberals would rather trash a campus and physically assault people, rather than listen to what a gay Jew that likes black men has to say. The Jew hating, homophobic, fascist leftists will do as they are told. Time to lock up the violent animals and throw away the key.

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes that any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

That's nice, by the way, what's your answer to the 2 questions I posed? Or were you hoping that I wouldn't notice your attempt to dodge?

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Straw Man Zone.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Of course liberals would rather trash a campus and physically assault people, rather than listen to what a gay Jew that likes black men has to say. The Jew hating, homophobic, fascist leftists will do as they are told. Time to lock up the violent animals and throw away the key.

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes that any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

That's nice, by the way, what's your answer to the 2 questions I posed? Or were you hoping that I wouldn't notice your attempt to dodge?

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Straw Man Zone.

Well that was the premise of your query; without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

 

[NightFox]

There has been a long term serious effort to screw up education for all but the wealthy for decades son.

Yep and unfortunately the "progressive" gub'mint worshipers have done a fairly thorough job of it too.

Your corporate state has son.

ROFLWTIME!!!! my "corporate state" .... that's rich coming from a gub'mint worshiper, thanks for the laugh.

"Scratch an egalitarian, and you will inevitably find a statist." -- Murray N. Rothbard

 

[Fenton Lum]

There has been a long term serious effort to screw up education for all but the wealthy for decades son.

Yep and unfortunately the "progressive" gub'mint worshipers have done a fairly thorough job of it too.

Your corporate state has son.

ROFLWTIME!!!! my "corporate state" .... that's rich coming from a gub'mint worshiper, thanks for the laugh.

"Scratch an egalitarian, and you will inevitably find a statist." -- Murray N. Rothbard

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, your entire economic and political system needs to come down, you have me confused with that liberal in your head you're always arguing with hon.

 

[NightFox]

Well that was the premise of your query;

You came to that conclusion based on what evidence?

without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

So what are your alternative wealth "distribution" proposal(s)?

 

[kaz]

Of course liberals would rather trash a campus and physically assault people, rather than listen to what a gay Jew that likes black men has to say. The Jew hating, homophobic, fascist leftists will do as they are told. Time to lock up the violent animals and throw away the key.

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

So seriously, you just argued that allowing non-liberal speech on campuses and not shutting it down with violence "would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all."

You are seriously one sick ****. Go kill yourself for the sake of humanity, you're filth of a human being

There has been a long term serious effort to screw up education for all but the wealthy for decades son.

You are a sick **** that you can defend violent suppression of free speech

 

[kaz]

Remember the good old days when trump protesters and hecklers were sucker punched, women where shoved around, teenage girls were pepper sprayed and the fake group, bikers for trump vowed to protect the rallies? Those were the good old days weren't they.

That never happened except in your delusional mind. I address it in the OP. You are lying. It was always the leftist protesters initiating the violence. Which is why the violence always occurred in the Trump rally, not on the leftist protester's area

 

[kaz]

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes that any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

That's nice, by the way, what's your answer to the 2 questions I posed? Or were you hoping that I wouldn't notice your attempt to dodge?

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Straw Man Zone.

Well that was the premise of your query; without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

Those wascally capiawists are bwocking your Mawxist utopia, awe they?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Well that was the premise of your query;

You came to that conclusion based on what evidence?

without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

So what are your alternative wealth "distribution" proposal(s)?

I think we all know when the rerigging began don't we now?

 

[kaz]

I hope at some point Trump starts shutting off funding for leftists so called schools of higher learning that don't protect their students from speaking if they aren't going to endorse leftist hatred. Berkeley was sick. The video and people who were there said the police did virtually nothing to stop the violent leftist assaults and destruction

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

I agree. That is why Americans have tossed out the failed leftist agenda. They have seen through the bull shit lies and have decided a change was needed.

You clearly do not see, you're still stuck in your partisanshithead fog.

You bipartisanly want to shut down non-leftist speech and support doing it with violence, got it. Thanks for clarifying in case anyone hadn't caught on to how bigoted and hate filled you are

Your own hopeless partisanshithead perceptual reality leaves you unable to understand that not everyone buys into that nonsense.

Right, allowing both sides to speak is partisanship. Your support of using violence to shut down all speech other than leftist speech isn't. I'd say you're on a roll today, but that was frankly butt stupid

 

[Fenton Lum]

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes that any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

That's nice, by the way, what's your answer to the 2 questions I posed? Or were you hoping that I wouldn't notice your attempt to dodge?

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Straw Man Zone.

Well that was the premise of your query; without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

Those wascally capiawists are bwocking your Mawxist utopia, awe they?

I kinda look forward to unrest in the streets which always comes along once the wealth disparity of a society becomes too unbalanced.

 

[Fenton Lum]

That would be in keeping with our societal trajectory of dumbing down the masses and abandoning public education for all. Other advanced nations invest in their societies and in having healthy and educated citizens which can only promote a society’s global competitiveness. We seem to work harder at having an unhealthy and dumbed down population and would rather redistribute wealth into the hands of the aristocracy instead of investing in our society.

I agree. That is why Americans have tossed out the failed leftist agenda. They have seen through the bull shit lies and have decided a change was needed.

You clearly do not see, you're still stuck in your partisanshithead fog.

You bipartisanly want to shut down non-leftist speech and support doing it with violence, got it. Thanks for clarifying in case anyone hadn't caught on to how bigoted and hate filled you are

Your own hopeless partisanshithead perceptual reality leaves you unable to understand that not everyone buys into that nonsense.

Right, allowing both sides to speak is partisanship. Your support of using violence to shut down all speech other than leftist speech isn't. I'd say you're on a roll today, but that was frankly butt stupid

You boy can't speak now? Really?

 

[kaz]

Annual Government spending in the United States already accounts for 34% of GDP (excluding amortization of future liabilities), at what level would you consider it to be an appropriate amount of "investing in our society"? Secondly are you aware that the upward wealth redistribution that you refer to primarily occurs via fiat currency supply expansion and the buying and selling of government power?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

You can't even know what the US spends on it's military hon, by law, and you lose way more for shittier healthcare outcomes that any other society on the planet in your health"care" system. You also have 1/4 of the world's encarcerated population in for profit prisons.

That's nice, by the way, what's your answer to the 2 questions I posed? Or were you hoping that I wouldn't notice your attempt to dodge?

And you wish to retain all this nonsense with your endless wars and arrive at a different outcome?

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Straw Man Zone.

Well that was the premise of your query; without changing society where are we going to come up with more money. The amount of societally generated wealth has never been an issue in american society. The issue has always been distribution and the founders were focused upon maintaining a ruling white male aristocracy.

Those wascally capiawists are bwocking your Mawxist utopia, awe they?

I kinda look forward to unrest in the streets which always comes along once the wealth disparity of a society becomes too unbalanced.

Here's the problem, Karl. Berkeley is one of the richest cities in America and the leftists out on the street are among the richest Americans. These are just Marxist ideologues

 

[kaz]

I agree. That is why Americans have tossed out the failed leftist agenda. They have seen through the bull shit lies and have decided a change was needed.

You clearly do not see, you're still stuck in your partisanshithead fog.

You bipartisanly want to shut down non-leftist speech and support doing it with violence, got it. Thanks for clarifying in case anyone hadn't caught on to how bigoted and hate filled you are

Your own hopeless partisanshithead perceptual reality leaves you unable to understand that not everyone buys into that nonsense.

Right, allowing both sides to speak is partisanship. Your support of using violence to shut down all speech other than leftist speech isn't. I'd say you're on a roll today, but that was frankly butt stupid

You boy can't speak now? Really?

So it's OK if you only shut down free speech with violence sometimes. So when would you object to it? How much shutting down free speech with violence would become a problem to you?