Leftist Nightmare: Black Conservatives Running for Office

[Faun]

Oh, look... a conservative rainbow coalition circle jerk.

And we love to jerk off all over your face......mmmmmm

Aww, how sweet, you paint a picture of me on your wankin' hand. You realize that face you're hitting is mine, right? It's the one you drew on your hand. Hell, I'm not even in the same room as you. Probably not even the same state.

Black unemployment is twice even with all the liberal goodies doled out and democrats running black areas of town

As the numbers indicate, it has nothing to do with which political party is in charge.

So why not try republicans in city govern,ent, democrats have done jack......


Oh and I have good aim, so if you want a mouth shot, I can oblige

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

Not for blacks. They lag behind regardless. That tells me the problem is with them.

LOLOLOLOL

Of course for blacks too. What the **** is wrong with you? Black unemployment typically runs about twice as high for blacks as it does for whites regardless of which party is in control; but as history has shown, the economy typically does better under Democrats. So even if black unemployment runs double that of whites during a Democrat administration, they're still doing better than if a Republican is in office.

 

[Faun]

Prove it then.... show the unemployment rate among blacks being less than twice that of whites during periods of Republican policies....

You're asking for proof of a claim I didn't make. I said blacks have supported Democrat policies and have been recipients of Democrat policies for 50 years with poor results. That's easy to prove.

In other words, better than Republican policies then...

Republican president ... 2.21 times higher
Democrat president ..... 2.15

Republican president & Congress ... 2.17
Democrat president & Congress ..... 2.16

white unemployment rate
black unemployment rate

And you're taking local and state government into account?

I'm quoting the same unemployment figures you were when you yelled, "BINGO."

You have a problem with those figures now??

Blacks have an unemployment rate twice that of white, today.

Seems you have a problem with that and forget LBJ will have them voting for another 150 years for a party that keeps them doing so well.

Your problem is you can't show any other time in history where black unemployment was any closer to white unemployment than it is at double.

 

[Conservative65]

And we love to jerk off all over your face......mmmmmm

Aww, how sweet, you paint a picture of me on your wankin' hand. You realize that face you're hitting is mine, right? It's the one you drew on your hand. Hell, I'm not even in the same room as you. Probably not even the same state.

Black unemployment is twice even with all the liberal goodies doled out and democrats running black areas of town

As the numbers indicate, it has nothing to do with which political party is in charge.

So why not try republicans in city govern,ent, democrats have done jack......


Oh and I have good aim, so if you want a mouth shot, I can oblige

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

Not for blacks. They lag behind regardless. That tells me the problem is with them.

LOLOLOLOL

Of course for blacks too. What the **** is wrong with you? Black unemployment typically runs about twice as high for blacks as it does for whites regardless of which party is in control; but as history has shown, the economy typically does better under Democrats. So even if black unemployment runs double that of whites during a Democrat administration, they're still doing better than if a Republican is in office.

So still running double during Democrats being in charge is better? Sounds the same to me.

 

[Conservative65]

You're asking for proof of a claim I didn't make. I said blacks have supported Democrat policies and have been recipients of Democrat policies for 50 years with poor results. That's easy to prove.

In other words, better than Republican policies then...

Republican president ... 2.21 times higher
Democrat president ..... 2.15

Republican president & Congress ... 2.17
Democrat president & Congress ..... 2.16

white unemployment rate
black unemployment rate

And you're taking local and state government into account?

I'm quoting the same unemployment figures you were when you yelled, "BINGO."

You have a problem with those figures now??

Blacks have an unemployment rate twice that of white, today.

Seems you have a problem with that and forget LBJ will have them voting for another 150 years for a party that keeps them doing so well.

Your problem is you can't show any other time in history where black unemployment was any closer to white unemployment than it is at double.

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

 

[konradv]

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

It's because the economy is usually better under Dems, so the absolute numbers are higher. If the Republicans could learn how capitalism works, maybe we'd all be better off.

 

[Conservative65]

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

It's because the economy is usually better under Dems, so the absolute numbers are higher. If the Republicans could learn how capitalism works, maybe we'd all be better off.

So you're also claiming twice is better although it's the same when Democrats are in control? Idiot.

If Democrats learned that socialism didn't work, we'd all be better off. That's how they keep blacks voting Democrat.

 

[Faun]

Aww, how sweet, you paint a picture of me on your wankin' hand. You realize that face you're hitting is mine, right? It's the one you drew on your hand. Hell, I'm not even in the same room as you. Probably not even the same state.

As the numbers indicate, it has nothing to do with which political party is in charge.

So why not try republicans in city govern,ent, democrats have done jack......


Oh and I have good aim, so if you want a mouth shot, I can oblige

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

Not for blacks. They lag behind regardless. That tells me the problem is with them.

LOLOLOLOL

Of course for blacks too. What the **** is wrong with you? Black unemployment typically runs about twice as high for blacks as it does for whites regardless of which party is in control; but as history has shown, the economy typically does better under Democrats. So even if black unemployment runs double that of whites during a Democrat administration, they're still doing better than if a Republican is in office.

So still running double during Democrats being in charge is better? Sounds the same to me.

Not when the unemployment rate is lower for both whites and blacks during Democrat administrations, it's not the same.

Common sense is not your strong suit.

 

[Faun]

In other words, better than Republican policies then...

Republican president ... 2.21 times higher
Democrat president ..... 2.15

Republican president & Congress ... 2.17
Democrat president & Congress ..... 2.16

white unemployment rate
black unemployment rate

And you're taking local and state government into account?

I'm quoting the same unemployment figures you were when you yelled, "BINGO."

You have a problem with those figures now??

Blacks have an unemployment rate twice that of white, today.

Seems you have a problem with that and forget LBJ will have them voting for another 150 years for a party that keeps them doing so well.

Your problem is you can't show any other time in history where black unemployment was any closer to white unemployment than it is at double.

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

Seriously, you can't possibly be this stupid to ask that question.

 

[konradv]

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

It's because the economy is usually better under Dems, so the absolute numbers are higher. If the Republicans could learn how capitalism works, maybe we'd all be better off.

So you're also claiming twice is better although it's the same when Democrats are in control? Idiot. If Democrats learned that socialism didn't work, we'd all be better off. That's how they keep blacks voting Democrat.

If Dems are socialists, why have the average economic numbers been better under Dems, since WW II?

Which Presidents Have Been Best for the Economy?

 

[Conservative65]

So why not try republicans in city govern,ent, democrats have done jack......


Oh and I have good aim, so if you want a mouth shot, I can oblige

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

Not for blacks. They lag behind regardless. That tells me the problem is with them.

LOLOLOLOL

Of course for blacks too. What the **** is wrong with you? Black unemployment typically runs about twice as high for blacks as it does for whites regardless of which party is in control; but as history has shown, the economy typically does better under Democrats. So even if black unemployment runs double that of whites during a Democrat administration, they're still doing better than if a Republican is in office.

So still running double during Democrats being in charge is better? Sounds the same to me.

Not when the unemployment rate is lower for both whites and blacks during Democrat administrations, it's not the same.

Common sense is not your strong suit.

Math isn't yours. Comparing Bush 43 and Clinton, the average unemployment was a .06% difference, 5.27% to 5.21%. With Obama, the average is over 9%. That takes into account almost 25 years. How far back do you want to go?

 

[Conservative65]

And you're taking local and state government into account?

I'm quoting the same unemployment figures you were when you yelled, "BINGO."

You have a problem with those figures now??

Blacks have an unemployment rate twice that of white, today.

Seems you have a problem with that and forget LBJ will have them voting for another 150 years for a party that keeps them doing so well.

Your problem is you can't show any other time in history where black unemployment was any closer to white unemployment than it is at double.

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

Seriously, you can't possibly be this stupid to ask that question.

Apparently you're too stupid to be able to answer it.

 

[Conservative65]

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

It's because the economy is usually better under Dems, so the absolute numbers are higher. If the Republicans could learn how capitalism works, maybe we'd all be better off.

So you're also claiming twice is better although it's the same when Democrats are in control? Idiot. If Democrats learned that socialism didn't work, we'd all be better off. That's how they keep blacks voting Democrat.

If Dems are socialists, why have the average economic numbers been better under Dems, since WW II?

Which Presidents Have Been Best for the Economy?

Are you saying that the growth was based on socialist policies? Prove it.

 

[Correll]

More than one in four blacks vote for the party that, from their perspective, legalized and protects the mass murder of black babies.

This has nothing to do with anything the Republicans are doing or not doing.

Black women make the decision to terminate their pregnancy on their own

Republicans want to deny them that choice at the same time they remove healthcare, childcare, food and housing for that child

What you just did there was to dismiss the 37% of blacks who are pro-life and their beliefs.

You include in your judgement of the issue, YOUR BELIEF that unborn babies are just "pregnancies" without any rights of their own.

PRO-LIFE BLACKS, BY DEFINITION, want to deny black women the "right" to kill their unborn babies.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

and you inability to respect or to even understand the viewpoint of someone who disagrees with you is incredible.

Nonsense.

In reality, he dismissed zero percent.

Pro-life is also a choice.

I explained in my post why I concluded that he had dismissed pro-life blacks and their beliefs.

You stated your disagreement with my claim, but in no way at all challenged or even addressed my reasoning.

Thus, your "in reality" is actually, just in your completely unsupported and groundless opinion.

And as you completely failed to even TRY to challenge my point, it still stands.



This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

Not at all. No one gets to tell a woman that she can't terminate her pregnancy as long as said pregnant woman seeks a legal abortion. Rendering your "37%" unqualified to begin with. rightwinger pointed out that black women are free to get an abortion, should they so choose -- and that includes 100%, whether they're pro-life or pro-choice.

Your own qualifier, ie "as long as she seeks a legal abortion" contradicts your whole point, that "no one can tell a woman she can't terminate her pregnancy" or that pro-life blacks are "unqualified" to have an opinion on the matter.


THus, my point about RW dismissing the interests and agenda of 37% of blacks stands.



PRO-LIFE BLACKS, BY DEFINITION, want to deny black women the "right" to kill their unborn babies.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

and you inability to respect or to even understand the viewpoint of someone who disagrees with you is incredible.

 

[Correll]

Well, 700 posts. Anyone name those black conservatives we're supposed to be so afraid of?

I have repeatedly pointed out the significant percentages of blacks with conservative views on polices that match those of the GOP, but still vote for the Dems.

Such as the 37% black pro-lifers.

It is dishonest of you to pretend that this has not been done.

 

[Correll]

Rightwinger knows that minorities hooked on government assistance, like a narcotic, won't vote republican if it means becoming more self supportive and accountable

Offer them something better

Take away housing and food stamps and send them on their way. Republican shaming and mockery are not a replacement

More than one in four blacks vote for the party that, from their perspective, legalized and protects the mass murder of black babies.

This has nothing to do with anything the Republicans are doing or not doing.

Black women make the decision to terminate their pregnancy on their own

Republicans want to deny them that choice at the same time they remove healthcare, childcare, food and housing for that child

What you just did there was to dismiss the 37% of blacks who are pro-life and their beliefs.

You include in your judgement of the issue, YOUR BELIEF that unborn babies are just "pregnancies" without any rights of their own.

PRO-LIFE BLACKS, BY DEFINITION, want to deny black women the "right" to kill their unborn babies.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

and you inability to respect or to even understand the viewpoint of someone who disagrees with you is incredible.

Like anyone else, they are entitled to their beliefs

...

So, why the complete disrespect and dismissal of them?

And why do they continue to support your side, despite the contempt your side has for them, and the fact that, from their perspective, that your side is the one that supports the Mass Murder of Black Babies?


That is why the Left is so terrified of Black Conservatives in office elected by white republicans.


Because it disproves the Lie that the dem power structure is based on.


ie that the GOP is out to oppress and kill blacks, so that thus blacks HAVE to vote for their only possible ally who can protect them, ie the Baby Killing Dems.

 

[Correll]

Oh, look... a conservative rainbow coalition circle jerk.

And we love to jerk off all over your face......mmmmmm

Aww, how sweet, you paint a picture of me on your wankin' hand. You realize that face you're hitting is mine, right? It's the one you drew on your hand. Hell, I'm not even in the same room as you. Probably not even the same state.

Black unemployment is twice even with all the liberal goodies doled out and democrats running black areas of town

As the numbers indicate, it has nothing to do with which political party is in charge.

So why not try republicans in city govern,ent, democrats have done jack......


Oh and I have good aim, so if you want a mouth shot, I can oblige

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

You may want to run a little comparison check of the numbers with this year's economic figures. Just how well did Democrat leadership do exactly?

• The unemployment rate for new college grads is 5.6 percent, compared with 5.5 percent in 2007.
• Young high school grads have an unemployment rate of 17.9 percent, compared with 15.9 percent in 2007.

for recent high-school graduates, about one-third are currently underemployed, compared with roughly 27 percent in 2007

Young college grads are suffering from an underemployment rate of 12.6 percent, compared with 9.6 percent in 2007

At the same time, many are entering the workforce with higher levels of debt, thanks to tuition fees that have increased far faster than median family income.

• Recent grads who are "idled" -- neither enrolled in school nor employed -- is still higher than before the recession. For college grads, the rate is now almost 10 percent, compared with 8.4 percent in 2007. About 15.5 percent of young high-school grads are now idled, compared with 13.7 percent in 2007.
• People of color are especially hard-hit. Young black college grads have an unemployment rate of 9.4 percent, compared with 8.9 percent in April 2007.

Job quality has eroded. In 2001, almost 42 percent of new college grads found jobs with pensions. That declined to just over 29 percent in 2015
Welcome to the job market, class of 2016: It still stinks

Anyone who is IN the job market can tell that it has worsened.

 

[Correll]

What passes for Republican outreach to minorities

All this republican whining and crying about who black people vote for has absolutely NOTHING to do with their concern for black lives or the futures of black children. They don't give a shit about black people .. something I know you are well aware of.

All the pity party whining that you're reading here has everything to do with the dismal future of the Republican Party and their rapidly shrinking base.

They are their own worst enemy and there is nothing they can do at this point to change their diminishing state of being. That's the good news.

You know, if you get your way, and you do marginalize the GOP...

All that will mean is that the status quo will continue and the black community will NEVER improve or solve or even seriously address any of it's many problems.


Without the GOP, and with the rapid growth of the Hispanic bloc, the dems will do even less than the nothing they have done for you up till now.

I hope you like gang culture, and drug related violence and poverty, and high rates of incarceration and lower life expectancy and high rates of ever form of social dysfunction,


because that is what you are working towards with your hardline support of the dems.

Unbeknownst to you, black people are solving our problems without you or the Republican Party .. neither of which intend to do a damn thing about our issues anyway.

That was an interesting claim. Too bad you provided nothing to back it up.

I don't gives a rats ass about what you think about black people or our issues. Not one damn.

YOu lack of concern about me does not challenge my point about how fucked you and yours are, if you succeed.

How about you stop pretending that you give a shit about black people. Obviously you don't. The ONLY reason you're crying about who we vote for is because we won't vote for republicans, which seriously damages any chance of them winning the White House.

Your self serving assumption that I don't care about my fellow Americans who happen to be black is based on nothing but YOUR prejudices and nonsensical beliefs about white people and/or the GOP.

Your all-white party has rejected black voters ..

Who told you that? White liberals? You believe everything they tell you? SUCKER.

But if you think black voters are coming to the rescue of the Republican Party .. well, that would be quite stupid, would it not?

NOt nearly as stupid as celebrating the idea that your people are so terrorized that over 1 in 4 of them feel compelled to vote for, by their definition, the party of mass murdering of black babies.

Surely you can beg better than that.

No words or white liberals required to know how republicans feel about black people .. and one would have to be a complete ******* moron not to recognize what you see right in front of your eyes.

I repeat, go chase Mexicans ... oh wait ..

I think I know what point you are trying to make.

BUT, I keep running into lefties that make vague assertions like yours, and then claim that I "put words in their mouths" when I respond to them.

So, before I reply, could you please tell me exactly what point you think that photo makes and how it responds to anything in my post?

Until you do, my previous points all stand as they have not been addressed, let alone challenged.

 

[Correll]

Your claim is that despite it being double regardless of who is in charge, it's better when Democrats are in control. If it's still double, how can the same be better?

It's because the economy is usually better under Dems, so the absolute numbers are higher. If the Republicans could learn how capitalism works, maybe we'd all be better off.

So you're also claiming twice is better although it's the same when Democrats are in control? Idiot. If Democrats learned that socialism didn't work, we'd all be better off. That's how they keep blacks voting Democrat.

If Dems are socialists, why have the average economic numbers been better under Dems, since WW II?

Which Presidents Have Been Best for the Economy?

Lets take a look. Some of this is history to me, some I lived though.


WWII. A dem in charge. The Nazi destroyed much of Europe and we destroyed the rest. NOt surprisingly the mass bombing of our competition was good for economy.

As well the massive rebuilding of our rivals after the war.

But the beginning of the Cold War.

The 50s. Good Economy under Ike.

The 60s, Kennedy/Johnson starts the twin disasters of Vietnam and the Great Society.

Which Nixon and then Ford are stuck with, and fail to solve.

Which Carter worsens.

Reagan comes in and spends the first 2 to 3 years fixing the economic mess he inherited and his entire two terms fixing the Cold War, at great expense.

Reagan's record breaking economy finally has a small recession just as Bush runs for re-election and he loses to Clinton.

Regan's economy rebounds before Bill even takes office (indeed, revised numbers show that the recession ended before voting, but strangely was incorrectly calculated and reported.)


BIll gets to coast on Reagan's economy, especially once the GOP congress is there to stop him from ******* it up.

Bush gets to take over just as the Unipolar Moment ends with a massive attack that kicks off the Great Recession (combined with the Fanni Mac Disaster caused mostly be dems)


He fails to really solve anything and then so does Obama.

 

[Faun]

Because economies do better under Democrat leadership than Republicans. Didn't you learn anything from Trump?

Not for blacks. They lag behind regardless. That tells me the problem is with them.

LOLOLOLOL

Of course for blacks too. What the **** is wrong with you? Black unemployment typically runs about twice as high for blacks as it does for whites regardless of which party is in control; but as history has shown, the economy typically does better under Democrats. So even if black unemployment runs double that of whites during a Democrat administration, they're still doing better than if a Republican is in office.

So still running double during Democrats being in charge is better? Sounds the same to me.

Not when the unemployment rate is lower for both whites and blacks during Democrat administrations, it's not the same.

Common sense is not your strong suit.

Math isn't yours. Comparing Bush 43 and Clinton, the average unemployment was a .06% difference, 5.27% to 5.21%. With Obama, the average is over 9%. That takes into account almost 25 years. How far back do you want to go?

Why would you not look at all the data?

BLS: Unemployment Rate

Republicans ... 6.0%
Democrats ..... 5.7%

And that's only half the story. The other half is where a president starts and how they finish. For example.... Clinton's average was 5.2% and Bush43's was 5.3%... but Clinton started with 7.3% unemployment and finished with 4.2%; whereas Bush43 started with 4.2% and ended up with 7.8%.

And when looking at all the data, not one single Democrat president left office with an unemployment rate higher than when they started. Compared to Republicans, where every single Republican president except for Reagan left office with the unemployment rate higher than when they started.

Republicans:

Starting average ... 4.8%
Ending average ..... 6.7%

Democrats:

Starting average ... 7.0%
Ending average ..... 5.1%

 

[Faun]

Black women make the decision to terminate their pregnancy on their own

Republicans want to deny them that choice at the same time they remove healthcare, childcare, food and housing for that child

What you just did there was to dismiss the 37% of blacks who are pro-life and their beliefs.

You include in your judgement of the issue, YOUR BELIEF that unborn babies are just "pregnancies" without any rights of their own.

PRO-LIFE BLACKS, BY DEFINITION, want to deny black women the "right" to kill their unborn babies.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

and you inability to respect or to even understand the viewpoint of someone who disagrees with you is incredible.

Nonsense.

In reality, he dismissed zero percent.

Pro-life is also a choice.

I explained in my post why I concluded that he had dismissed pro-life blacks and their beliefs.

You stated your disagreement with my claim, but in no way at all challenged or even addressed my reasoning.

Thus, your "in reality" is actually, just in your completely unsupported and groundless opinion.

And as you completely failed to even TRY to challenge my point, it still stands.



This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

Not at all. No one gets to tell a woman that she can't terminate her pregnancy as long as said pregnant woman seeks a legal abortion. Rendering your "37%" unqualified to begin with. rightwinger pointed out that black women are free to get an abortion, should they so choose -- and that includes 100%, whether they're pro-life or pro-choice.

Your own qualifier, ie "as long as she seeks a legal abortion" contradicts your whole point, that "no one can tell a woman she can't terminate her pregnancy" or that pro-life blacks are "unqualified" to have an opinion on the matter.


THus, my point about RW dismissing the interests and agenda of 37% of blacks stands.



PRO-LIFE BLACKS, BY DEFINITION, want to deny black women the "right" to kill their unborn babies.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

This is not about a reasonable disagreement on the issues, or even a legitimate conflict of interests.

This is about that the fact that people like you have terrorized and race baited the black community for generations to the point that Pro-life Blacks view the party that supports the mass murder of black babies as their only ally against the Evul Republicans.


Great job.

If your goal was to tear this nation apart.

and you inability to respect or to even understand the viewpoint of someone who disagrees with you is incredible.

That "qualifier" is the law respecting the viability of an unborn child and changes nothing in my post. And those restrictions apply to all women regardless of race. Leaving rightwinger's point that 100% black women are free to choose for themselves; even if some may be pro-life and choose not to terminate their pregnancies. That's still a choice.

And yet the vast majority of them vote for white libs like you who want to see those black babies "murdered" in the millions.

You poor misguided soul.