Lead Investigator Says President Biden ‘Committed Many Crimes’

[San Souci]

That wasn’t illegal. That was a his job as mandated by our foreign policy. Congress even signed a litter calling for reforms to that prosecutors office.

You need to get your facts straight. You implying that Biden sat down in front of cameras and illegally bribed a foreign official is ludicrous. How can you be so dumb as to believe such nonsense and expect others to?

Since he did ,what is your beef?

 

[BlindBoo]

Funny how Joe bragged about getting the prosecutor looking into Hunter's business fired. He leverage.d Obama's (taxpayers money) to do it. Funny how the Democrats impeached Trump for wanting to look into this impropriety and Corruption. How dishonest

In reality the prosecutor was suppose to be looking into the conduct of the former owner of the company and those charges had nothing to do with Hunter Biden. The crimes the former owner was accused of happened before the ouster of the old Government and well before they offered a job to Hunter. No taxpayer money was used in the loan guarantees. There was no quid pro quo found between Biden and Bursima. Benedict Donald only wanted the announcement of an investigation anyway. His friends in the Media would take it from there.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Again, it isn't. You can't factually establish any briber. You can't establish any specific demand for the bribe. You can't establish Biden enacting any policy in exchange for money.

You have a story, backed by no specific evidence.

Biden can't even cut the funding in question. That's a decision for the Obama administration. So your silly, baseless conspiracy is a legal impossibility. In addition to be pristinely fact free.

I presented a lot more evidence and facts than you have. Not my fault that you just shrink into your hoodie and either discredit my sources or discredit my claims. You are a fool, you probably can't help it.

 

[Blisterfinger]

No one disputes that Biden threatened to hold up the funding because of Shokin. That was reported consistently and is no secret.

The unsupported part is that Shokin was investigating Zlochevsky. There’s no evidence of this and Solomon claims this happened but provides zero evidence.

Why don't you explain to us why he held up the funding then in order to get the prosecutor fired

 

[Blisterfinger]

In reality the prosecutor was suppose to be looking into the conduct of the former owner of the company and those charges had nothing to do with Hunter Biden. The crimes the former owner was accused of happened before the ouster of the old Government and well before they offered a job to Hunter. No taxpayer money was used in the loan guarantees. There was no quid pro quo found between Biden and Bursima. Benedict Donald only wanted the announcement of an investigation anyway. His friends in the Media would take it from there.

His friends in the Media would take it from there.

What Friends Are those? LOL

 

[Marener]

Why don't you explain to us why he held up the funding then in order to get the prosecutor fired

Because the prosecutor was widely known to be running a corrupt office where the prosecutors would spend more time extorting businesses for bribes than prosecuting actual criminals.

When the US started working with a special unit to go after government corruption, they started turning up evidence of corruption in his office. At that point, Shokin started going after the special unit and forcing them out.

The US did not want to spend money in Ukraine if there was no hope in rooting out corruption.

This is all detailed in testimony from state department officials who were part of the decision making process and widely known in the press, among our allies and with the Ukrainian people.

 

[Blisterfinger]

In reality the prosecutor was suppose to be looking into the conduct of the former owner of the company and those charges had nothing to do with Hunter Biden. The crimes the former owner was accused of happened before the ouster of the old Government and well before they offered a job to Hunter. No taxpayer money was used in the loan guarantees. There was no quid pro quo found between Biden and Bursima. Benedict Donald only wanted the announcement of an investigation anyway. His friends in the Media would take it from there.

No taxpayer money was used in the loan guarantees. There was no quid pro quo found between Biden and Bursima.

Who supplies the money for the government to give out? The tooth fairy? LOL
The article I've been quoting all this time and just came out today provided the link between the bidens and brisma. Did you read it?

 

[BlindBoo]

What Friends Are those? LOL

Faux & fiends Not News. They lie to the sheep in a fair and balanced way. Heads, Benedict Donald has always been right, tails the Democrat are all evil sick bastards working for Satan trying to steal your babies soul.

 

[Slade3200]

Since he did ,what is your beef?

Since who did what?

 

[Clipper]

you know good and darn well the doj will not go after Briben even if he did commit crimes ... and you're fine with it ..

You mean like they DIDN'T go after Hunter?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Bury his senile ASS!

 

[BlindBoo]

Who supplies the money for the government to give out? The tooth fairy? LOL
The article I've been quoting all this time and just came out today provided the link between the bidens and brisma. Did you read it?

Banks.

Does it show a link to Joe Biden peddling influence?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Because the prosecutor was widely known to be running a corrupt office where the prosecutors would spend more time extorting businesses for bribes than prosecuting actual criminals.

When the US started working with a special unit to go after government corruption, they started turning up evidence of corruption in his office. At that point, Shokin started going after the special unit and forcing them out.

The US did not want to spend money in Ukraine if there was no hope in rooting out corruption.

This is all detailed in testimony from state department officials who were part of the decision making process and widely known in the press, among our allies and with the Ukrainian people.

New evidence shows that you are incorrect and that the prosecutor was looking into burisma with Hunter Biden. Joe Biden needed that prosecutor fired.

The cache of documents was recently turned over by former Hunter Biden business partner Devon Archer to the House Oversight Committee as part of its impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden's conduct.

The new evidence shows the major investment plan was being built at the time when Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma's board of directors and Joe Biden was still serving as Barack Obama's vice president in charge of U.S.-Ukraine policy.


The memos state Hunter Biden was also supposed to serve on the board of the new company called Burnham Energy Security LLC, and it was going to be capitalized in 2015 by Burisma owner Nykola Zlochevsky, who at a time was trying to get out from under corruption allegations in his home country.

The Hunter Biden-connected Burnham entity was slated to get a quarter of the new venture's net revenues without putting up any cash, according to recent testimony to Congress from one of the partners.

Zlochevsky, the Ukrainian oligarch, meanwhile was committed to "$120 Million over thirty-six (36) months to be invested in exploration and leasehold improvements" in the new venture designed to make Burisma a global energy leader, according to a prospectus for the project.

Hunter Biden's attorney, Abbe Lowell, did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News.

Hunter Biden's "credibility" for venture

Zlochevsky's top lieutenant, Vadym Pozharskyi, wrote in an August 2015 email that it was important to his boss for Hunter Biden to be involved with Burnham Energy.

"You mentioned to me that it's also you and HB [Hunter Biden] who will be the founders of the Llc in Delaware. Cliff mentioned only yourself,” Pozharskyi wrote Archer in August 2015 in one email obtained by Just the News. “For credibility ‘Ukrainian’ purposes you both would be better."

File
HunterBidenLichstensteinUkrainewantsHB-1.pdf
It is unclear exactly what Pozharskyi meant by “credibility,” but Just the News previously reported that Burisma saw Hunter Biden’s involvement on its board as a form of protection, especially from pressure by its own government, according to Archer’s testimony for the House impeachment

 

[Blisterfinger]

Faux & fiends Not News. They lie to the sheep in a fair and balanced way. Heads, Benedict Donald has always been right, tails the Democrat are all evil sick bastards working for Satan trying to steal your babies soul.

Oh yeah, the only news source in America that would ever say anything good about Donald Trump! Well you can just stick to propaganda and bury your head up your ass, Common Sense will win out.

 

[Slade3200]

Bury his senile ASS!

How?

 

[Blisterfinger]

You mean like they DIDN'T go after Hunter?

There was this heroic judge in Delaware..

 

[Blisterfinger]

Banks.

Does it show a link to Joe Biden peddling influence?

Wow you are stupider than I thought. LOL

 

[Marener]

New evidence shows that you are incorrect and that the prosecutor was looking into burisma with Hunter Biden

There’s nothing in this article that indicates there was any investigation by Shokin.

This is just talk about launching a new company that never happened.

 

[Clipper]

There was this heroic judge in Delaware..

Hunter Biden has a better shot at staying out of prison then Spanky Trump the lunatic does.

 

[Slade3200]

New evidence shows that you are incorrect and that the prosecutor was looking into burisma with Hunter Biden. Joe Biden needed that prosecutor fired.

The cache of documents was recently turned over by former Hunter Biden business partner Devon Archer to the House Oversight Committee as part of its impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden's conduct.

The new evidence shows the major investment plan was being built at the time when Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma's board of directors and Joe Biden was still serving as Barack Obama's vice president in charge of U.S.-Ukraine policy.


The memos state Hunter Biden was also supposed to serve on the board of the new company called Burnham Energy Security LLC, and it was going to be capitalized in 2015 by Burisma owner Nykola Zlochevsky, who at a time was trying to get out from under corruption allegations in his home country.

The Hunter Biden-connected Burnham entity was slated to get a quarter of the new venture's net revenues without putting up any cash, according to recent testimony to Congress from one of the partners.

Zlochevsky, the Ukrainian oligarch, meanwhile was committed to "$120 Million over thirty-six (36) months to be invested in exploration and leasehold improvements" in the new venture designed to make Burisma a global energy leader, according to a prospectus for the project.

Hunter Biden's attorney, Abbe Lowell, did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News.

Hunter Biden's "credibility" for venture

Zlochevsky's top lieutenant, Vadym Pozharskyi, wrote in an August 2015 email that it was important to his boss for Hunter Biden to be involved with Burnham Energy.

"You mentioned to me that it's also you and HB [Hunter Biden] who will be the founders of the Llc in Delaware. Cliff mentioned only yourself,” Pozharskyi wrote Archer in August 2015 in one email obtained by Just the News. “For credibility ‘Ukrainian’ purposes you both would be better."

File
HunterBidenLichstensteinUkrainewantsHB-1.pdf
It is unclear exactly what Pozharskyi meant by “credibility,” but Just the News previously reported that Burisma saw Hunter Biden’s involvement on its board as a form of protection, especially from pressure by its own government, according to Archer’s testimony for the House impeachment

What Hunter and Burisma were working on has zero to do with USA and our allies recognizing the corruption in the prosecutors office and calling for reform. Youre blinded by smoke and mirrors