the problem would be fix if she was working for a living like the rest of us.
If you don't need socialism..... Then inherently you don't have corruption. If we didn't have a multi-billion dollar socialist system running, there wouldn't be a need for any company, and thus no need to lobby for those contracts.
The people on the left, want to have a huge socialist system, but magically don't want corruption. Sorry, that's not possible. If you have government involved, there is going to be corruption. You can scream and yell about accenture, but as long as you have a system giving out money, there is going to be companies lobbying to get that money.
That's how government has always worked in every system, in every country, in every age. I'm not saying you are wrong, but i am saying you are wasting your time. If it wasn't them, it will be someone else.
what is she doing with her kids while she works?
Do you think a minimum wage job pays for her to feed those kids?
And where are they going to live when she takes that minimum wage job?
And where are the jobs when there are 6 applicants for every one job?
and knowing that what you're saying is absurd does not make anyone a socialist. so you should probably understand the terms you use.
No answer to anything I just said, changes my points.
There is no 6 applicants for every one job. That's a lie. A large portion of the jobs out there, are not listed.
Second, very few jobs are minimum wage. If you go and work at Wendy's even, just working full time will get you a wage over the minimum. If you work odd hours, you can earn more.
When I was in high school, I worked at Wendy's. There was a Romanian immigrant there that had a family of 4, and his wife didn't work. He was able to feed his entire family on a Wendy's wage. That was back when the minimum wage was $4.25. Now it's $7.25, and you are telling me a born American that knows English, and had the benefits of an education, can't possibly make it on almost double what he did?
And lastly, where is her family? Where is her husband? Where is extended family? Where is her church? Where are her friends?
If I had kids, there are dozens of people I could take them too, while I work on getting a better paying job. Family, friends, church, and so on.
If she said screw you to everyone in her life, her husband, her family, her church, her friends..... Why should I be forced to pay for her?
Not to mention there are dozens of free charities for exactly such a situation. Is she refusing to take charity help, so she can instead sit at home and soak the tax payer?
You people are full of excuses. Like I said, the left support irresponsibility. You have non-stop excuses, just like I bet this lady has for why she can't take care of her own kids. Excuses and irresponsibility go hand in hand, and you it up under the guise of "caring", when you yourself really don't care. You people never help the poor yourselves, but your real quick to try and make others do it.
No more excuses. Down with leftists.