Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
This was a total rejection of the Hussien Obama presidency. And Hillary was stupid enough to embrace him.
This was a total rejection of the Hussien Obama presidency. And Hillary was stupid enough to embrace him.
Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
So what is it you want then if not war?
This was a total rejection of the Hussien Obama presidency. And Hillary was stupid enough to embrace him.
Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Please don´t start new wars but help end the current ones.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Yup, more war. That's what America needs, to start more wars where we have to spend more money and soldiers lose their lives.
Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
So what is it you want then if not war?
I found it hard to believe that even after the polls were indicating that a record number of Americans - 70% were dissatisfied with where we are heading and we are on the wrong track, she basically announced that her agenda is a continuation of the Obama agenda. Huge miscalculation.This was a total rejection of the Hussien Obama presidency. And Hillary was stupid enough to embrace him.
Yeah, she embraced him when his popularity rose in the polls, after slicing his ass up in '08 and prior to her official campaign launch, when his numbers were in the tank while ISIS was spreading rapidly.
Obama and demagoguery definitely have a place in this however. Obamacare, 'with you or without you', 'elections have consequences' and on and on and on.
His hubris and disregard for anyone that disagreed with his agenda spread to the rest of the left and they ignored the fact that a huge number of Americans did not agree with his/their agenda.
They thought they had the numbers to steamroll those people yet again and marginalize them permanently in this country and were dancing in glee at the prospect of doing exactly that, breaking any and all rules as they thought appropriate, safe in their comfy nests of rectitude and self-righteousness.
That miscalculation has come home to bite them squarely in the ass. Part of me wants to see those people's heads shoved in toilets for the next 4 years, as I think some of those fucking assholes deserve it in spades, but the larger part says we need to learn from their mistakes, realize we are a deeply divided nation and figure out a way to make this country actually work. Unfortunately, I doubt swirlies will help that along....
Yeah, the Russians provide massive air support to Syrian forces. But how is that an argument? It is not a Russian mess they are cleaning up but an American. And by all standards, aren´t this groups a major threat to the local people and also to the people everywhere?Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
So what is it you want then if not war?
I don't really like arming anyone we don't know so I don't disagree there. But isn't Russia already bombing them? Will us spending $ and possibly lives really help? Who does Israel want to win over there?
Yeah, the Russians provide massive air support to Syrian forces. But how is that an argument? It is not a Russian mess they are cleaning up but an American. And by all standards, aren´t this groups a major threat to the local people and also to the people everywhere?Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Like Bush?
So what is it you want then if not war?
I don't really like arming anyone we don't know so I don't disagree there. But isn't Russia already bombing them? Will us spending $ and possibly lives really help? Who does Israel want to win over there?
I found it hard to believe that even after the polls were indicating that a record number of Americans - 70% were dissatisfied with where we are heading and we are on the wrong track, she basically announced that her agenda is a continuation of the Obama agenda. Huge miscalculation.This was a total rejection of the Hussien Obama presidency. And Hillary was stupid enough to embrace him.
Yeah, she embraced him when his popularity rose in the polls, after slicing his ass up in '08 and prior to her official campaign launch, when his numbers were in the tank while ISIS was spreading rapidly.
Obama and demagoguery definitely have a place in this however. Obamacare, 'with you or without you', 'elections have consequences' and on and on and on.
His hubris and disregard for anyone that disagreed with his agenda spread to the rest of the left and they ignored the fact that a huge number of Americans did not agree with his/their agenda.
They thought they had the numbers to steamroll those people yet again and marginalize them permanently in this country and were dancing in glee at the prospect of doing exactly that, breaking any and all rules as they thought appropriate, safe in their comfy nests of rectitude and self-righteousness.
That miscalculation has come home to bite them squarely in the ass. Part of me wants to see those people's heads shoved in toilets for the next 4 years, as I think some of those fucking assholes deserve it in spades, but the larger part says we need to learn from their mistakes, realize we are a deeply divided nation and figure out a way to make this country actually work. Unfortunately, I doubt swirlies will help that along....
If you get into it and realize there are millions of refugees, you´d also realize there aren´t many civilians in the war zones which have been largely the same for years. There are exceptions like Aleppo but claims that Syria and Russia are bombing the civilians there are untrue. Since the army tightened the belt around eastern Aleppo, there have been no more air strikes.Yeah, the Russians provide massive air support to Syrian forces. But how is that an argument? It is not a Russian mess they are cleaning up but an American. And by all standards, aren´t this groups a major threat to the local people and also to the people everywhere?Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.
So what is it you want then if not war?
I don't really like arming anyone we don't know so I don't disagree there. But isn't Russia already bombing them? Will us spending $ and possibly lives really help? Who does Israel want to win over there?
I believe all the bombing has also been quite a threat to the locals. I'm not sure more bombing will make things better.
We will see. Victories in this sort of thing are hard to come by. I think Russia expected it to be over by now. The people we abandon will immediately hate us. I'm with Ron Paul on foreign policy. The more we do the worse things seem to get.If you get into it and realize there are millions of refugees, you´d also realize there aren´t many civilians in the war zones which have been largely the same for years. There are exceptions like Aleppo but claims that Syria and Russia are bombing the civilians there are untrue. Since the army tightens the belt around eastern Aleppo, there have been no more air strikes.Yeah, the Russians provide massive air support to Syrian forces. But how is that an argument? It is not a Russian mess they are cleaning up but an American. And by all standards, aren´t this groups a major threat to the local people and also to the people everywhere?Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.So what is it you want then if not war?
I don't really like arming anyone we don't know so I don't disagree there. But isn't Russia already bombing them? Will us spending $ and possibly lives really help? Who does Israel want to win over there?
I believe all the bombing has also been quite a threat to the locals. I'm not sure more bombing will make things better.
ISIS, Nusra and co are very mobile forces and need to be bombed on their travels. This is were the US can certainly be a big help.
US allies need to calm down. Many threats, like the North Korean, aren´t there.We will see. Victories in this sort of thing are hard to come by. I think Russia expected it to be over by now. The people we abandon will immediately hate us. I'm with Ron Paul on foreign policy. The more we do the worse things seem to get.If you get into it and realize there are millions of refugees, you´d also realize there aren´t many civilians in the war zones which have been largely the same for years. There are exceptions like Aleppo but claims that Syria and Russia are bombing the civilians there are untrue. Since the army tightens the belt around eastern Aleppo, there have been no more air strikes.Yeah, the Russians provide massive air support to Syrian forces. But how is that an argument? It is not a Russian mess they are cleaning up but an American. And by all standards, aren´t this groups a major threat to the local people and also to the people everywhere?Don´t get me wrong. The US could join the war on terror in Syria. Even if Trump focuses only on ISIS, the results will be the same on the other frontiers. First of all, the US could stop support for what they call "moderate opposition" which doesn´t exist. Heck, who cares if the child beheaders call themselves al-Zinki or ISIS? Then Trump can bomb ISIS. But he also can bomb Nusra, Zinki and co. And as a new element of foreign policy, Trump can do it in accord with international law, massively fighting terrorists and boosting US reputation.
I don't really like arming anyone we don't know so I don't disagree there. But isn't Russia already bombing them? Will us spending $ and possibly lives really help? Who does Israel want to win over there?
I believe all the bombing has also been quite a threat to the locals. I'm not sure more bombing will make things better.
ISIS, Nusra and co are very mobile forces and need to be bombed on their travels. This is were the US can certainly be a big help.
No! During Bush´s "war on terror" Al-Qaeda groups grew to armies capable of existentially threatening nations. The war on Iraq in 2003 was the starting point for al-Qaeda to settle down in the Middle East.Now the way is free for the US to join the real war on terror.
Like Bush?
So what is it you want then if not war?