Lawyers for Nick Sandmann File 250 Million Dollar Lawsuit Against Washington Post

[Faun]

And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!

Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!

Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.

He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.

Oh? What was libelous?

Read the lawsuit, you ******* dumbass.

So....you really really don't know.

LOL

Nope, the ******* moron doesn’t have a clue. That’s why he’s so desperately trying to shift the burden of proof onto others — because he himself cannot prove a word in that complaint.

 

[Faun]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

 

[Polishprince]

That his parents have been parading in front of the media.

The parents are mercenary assholes who are using their son to his detriment. The family is going to lose. Bigly.

Oh, now it's the parents fault for the MSM putting a target on that kid's head? Within hours of the video being uploaded, long before any lawsuits, his name and reputation was dragged through the mud all to satisfy the left's insatiable appetite for something to be outraged about.

There is no target on this kids head. He said he shouldn’t have done it and he wishes he hadn’t.

His parents are pigs and they’re going to lose.

Sure there was a target on Sandmann's head. You had people on TV calling for people to punch the child, libs were calling in bomb threats. Even the bishop of Covington believed the lies and considered expelling Mr. Sandmann from the Catholic Church.

 

[Faun]

It's linked in the OP, Dumb Shit. It's been there the entire time.

Or didn't you bother to read the OP?

No, there's a link to the lawsuit. Prove the statements mentioned in the lawsuit weren't made by WAPO.

There is NO NEED TO PROVE THEY WEREN'T made by WaPo. We presume that they WERE made by WaPo.

That's the whole ******* POINT. The suit cites seven (7) articles as "defamatory" -- and cites passages directly from those articles, rendering the WaPo paywall IRRELEVANT, since we have them right in front of us in the court document.

What you have to do then is get your teacher to read you the actual passages they cite.

And when you do that you find out that NOWHERE in ANY of them does any such "defamation" appear. I already did that, and you can too.

=OR= you can find what I somehow didn't find, and post it here.

Get busy. I an't got all week.

Good GODS you're a lazy ****. No wonder you post wet Wisconsin trolley tracks and try to pass them off as "the Democratic convention".

So which of these statements didn't WAPO make?

On January 19, 20 and 21, the Post ignored the truth and falsely accused Nicholas of, among other things, “accost[ing]” Phillips by “suddenly swarm[ing]” him in a “threaten[ing]” and “physically intimidat[ing]” manner as Phillips “and other activists were wrapping up the march and preparing to leave,” “block[ing]” Phillips path, refusing to allow Phillips “to retreat,” “taunting the dispersing indigenous crowd,” chanting “build that wall,” “Trump2020,” or “go back to Africa,” and otherwise engaging in racist and improper conduct which ended only “when Phillips and other activists walked away.”​

READ THE CITATIONS, asswipe. What you have here are the complaints --- which are written by the attorneys. WaPo didn't write that.

The CITATIONS would be under the heading, "Cause of Action for Defamation". Once again you quit reading before you got to the crucial part, and you're left standing on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin.

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

 

[Polishprince]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

Harvard is a pretty stupid institution nowadays. They actually thought that Liz Warren said she was an Indian, when all Liz said was that she was 1/1024 Indian according to a DNA test.

 

[Polishprince]

No, there's a link to the lawsuit. Prove the statements mentioned in the lawsuit weren't made by WAPO.

There is NO NEED TO PROVE THEY WEREN'T made by WaPo. We presume that they WERE made by WaPo.

That's the whole ******* POINT. The suit cites seven (7) articles as "defamatory" -- and cites passages directly from those articles, rendering the WaPo paywall IRRELEVANT, since we have them right in front of us in the court document.

What you have to do then is get your teacher to read you the actual passages they cite.

And when you do that you find out that NOWHERE in ANY of them does any such "defamation" appear. I already did that, and you can too.

=OR= you can find what I somehow didn't find, and post it here.

Get busy. I an't got all week.

Good GODS you're a lazy ****. No wonder you post wet Wisconsin trolley tracks and try to pass them off as "the Democratic convention".

So which of these statements didn't WAPO make?

On January 19, 20 and 21, the Post ignored the truth and falsely accused Nicholas of, among other things, “accost[ing]” Phillips by “suddenly swarm[ing]” him in a “threaten[ing]” and “physically intimidat[ing]” manner as Phillips “and other activists were wrapping up the march and preparing to leave,” “block[ing]” Phillips path, refusing to allow Phillips “to retreat,” “taunting the dispersing indigenous crowd,” chanting “build that wall,” “Trump2020,” or “go back to Africa,” and otherwise engaging in racist and improper conduct which ended only “when Phillips and other activists walked away.”​

READ THE CITATIONS, asswipe. What you have here are the complaints --- which are written by the attorneys. WaPo didn't write that.

The CITATIONS would be under the heading, "Cause of Action for Defamation". Once again you quit reading before you got to the crucial part, and you're left standing on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin.

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

 

[Faun]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

Harvard is a pretty stupid institution nowadays. They actually thought that Liz Warren said she was an Indian, when all Liz said was that she was 1/1024 Indian according to a DNA test.

^^^ that’s what jealous stupid losers say because they are bitter they could never get into such a fine institution while folks like Barack Obama and David Hogg, folks they hate to their core, can.

 

[Faun]

There is NO NEED TO PROVE THEY WEREN'T made by WaPo. We presume that they WERE made by WaPo.

That's the whole ******* POINT. The suit cites seven (7) articles as "defamatory" -- and cites passages directly from those articles, rendering the WaPo paywall IRRELEVANT, since we have them right in front of us in the court document.

What you have to do then is get your teacher to read you the actual passages they cite.

And when you do that you find out that NOWHERE in ANY of them does any such "defamation" appear. I already did that, and you can too.

=OR= you can find what I somehow didn't find, and post it here.

Get busy. I an't got all week.

Good GODS you're a lazy ****. No wonder you post wet Wisconsin trolley tracks and try to pass them off as "the Democratic convention".

So which of these statements didn't WAPO make?

On January 19, 20 and 21, the Post ignored the truth and falsely accused Nicholas of, among other things, “accost[ing]” Phillips by “suddenly swarm[ing]” him in a “threaten[ing]” and “physically intimidat[ing]” manner as Phillips “and other activists were wrapping up the march and preparing to leave,” “block[ing]” Phillips path, refusing to allow Phillips “to retreat,” “taunting the dispersing indigenous crowd,” chanting “build that wall,” “Trump2020,” or “go back to Africa,” and otherwise engaging in racist and improper conduct which ended only “when Phillips and other activists walked away.”​

READ THE CITATIONS, asswipe. What you have here are the complaints --- which are written by the attorneys. WaPo didn't write that.

The CITATIONS would be under the heading, "Cause of Action for Defamation". Once again you quit reading before you got to the crucial part, and you're left standing on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin.

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

There were a hundred students there. If they wanted to get violent, as you suggest an adult would have, Phillips would have had no chance. Fortunately, folks are not as violent as you.

 

[Polishprince]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

Harvard is a pretty stupid institution nowadays. They actually thought that Liz Warren said she was an Indian, when all Liz said was that she was 1/1024 Indian according to a DNA test.

^^^ that’s what jealous stupid losers say because they are bitter they could never get into such a fine institution while folks like Barack Obama and David Hogg, folks they hate to their core, can.

I couldn't have afforded to go to Harvard- I didn't have that kind of scratch.

But it was the libs who said that Harvard was mistaken about Warren's ancestry in the modern age.

 

[Polishprince]

So which of these statements didn't WAPO make?

On January 19, 20 and 21, the Post ignored the truth and falsely accused Nicholas of, among other things, “accost[ing]” Phillips by “suddenly swarm[ing]” him in a “threaten[ing]” and “physically intimidat[ing]” manner as Phillips “and other activists were wrapping up the march and preparing to leave,” “block[ing]” Phillips path, refusing to allow Phillips “to retreat,” “taunting the dispersing indigenous crowd,” chanting “build that wall,” “Trump2020,” or “go back to Africa,” and otherwise engaging in racist and improper conduct which ended only “when Phillips and other activists walked away.”​

READ THE CITATIONS, asswipe. What you have here are the complaints --- which are written by the attorneys. WaPo didn't write that.

The CITATIONS would be under the heading, "Cause of Action for Defamation". Once again you quit reading before you got to the crucial part, and you're left standing on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin.

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

There were a hundred students there. If they wanted to get violent, as you suggest an adult would have, Phillips would have had no chance. Fortunately, folks are not as violent as you.

Why do you think that most adults would have suffered the abuse that the phony veteran was dishing out gladly?

Mr. Phillips didn't think that, that's why he decided to pester well behaved children instead of adults.

 

[Pogo]

READ THE CITATIONS, asswipe. What you have here are the complaints --- which are written by the attorneys. WaPo didn't write that.

The CITATIONS would be under the heading, "Cause of Action for Defamation". Once again you quit reading before you got to the crucial part, and you're left standing on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin.

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

There were a hundred students there. If they wanted to get violent, as you suggest an adult would have, Phillips would have had no chance. Fortunately, folks are not as violent as you.

Why do you think that most adults would have suffered the abuse that the phony veteran was dishing out gladly?

Mr. Phillips didn't think that, that's why he decided to pester well behaved children instead of adults.

So you're saying the little shit sized up the old man and figured he could get away with that Smirk?

Tell us something we don't know.

 

[Pogo]

And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!




Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!

Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.

He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.

Oh? What was libelous?

Read the lawsuit, you ******* dumbass.

Yeah we did. Just as I told you to read it and challenged you to find it.

Once again ---- you FAILED.
And you FAILED because it ain't there. That's why you FAILED. If you ever wonder why you FAILED, see this post.
You know, the one that tells you how you FAILED.

Just like that colossal fuckup trying to tell us the Democratic convention meets in December on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin. Not only did you FAIL to see right through that bullshit blog, you also FAILED to acknowledge your fuckup. All this is why you're a FAILURE, Fingerfuck.

 

[Polishprince]

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

There were a hundred students there. If they wanted to get violent, as you suggest an adult would have, Phillips would have had no chance. Fortunately, folks are not as violent as you.

Why do you think that most adults would have suffered the abuse that the phony veteran was dishing out gladly?

Mr. Phillips didn't think that, that's why he decided to pester well behaved children instead of adults.

So you're saying the little shit sized up the old man and figured he could get away with that Smirk?

Tell us something we don't know.

no, the Phony Veteran came up to the child, Sandmann was just minding his own beeswax.

The Black Congressional Israelites had been hollering all kinds of filth at the Covington children for an hour, and Phillips decided to get in on the fun.

 

[bripat9643]

It's very difficult to prove you have been "hurt" when you have a history of blackface.

Without a source, subtitles or explanations, your pic is worthless.

Here ya go. Lots more pics there too.

It says they were "from" Covington high school. That doesn't mean the Covington high school team is playing here. Notice the player's shirt says "University" at the bottom, so this obviously isn't a high school game. So if it wasn't a high school game, then how do we know the students in the photo were actually from Covington High School?

It also says they "goaded" black members of the opposite team. Probably all the team members were black, and what does "goaded" mean? Did they shout "your mother wears army boots?" Goading the opposite team is quite common in basket ball games.

Overall, this picture is bullshit. It would have been all over the internet if it was credible.

 

[bripat9643]

And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!




Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!

Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.

He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.

Oh? What was libelous?

Read the lawsuit, you ******* dumbass.

Yeah we did. Just as I told you to read it and challenged you to find it.

Once again ---- you FAILED.
And you FAILED because it ain't there. That's why you FAILED. If you ever wonder why you FAILED, see this post.
You know, the one that tells you how you FAILED.

Just like that colossal fuckup trying to tell us the Democratic convention meets in December on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin. Not only did you FAIL to see right through that bullshit blog, you also FAILED to acknowledge your fuckup. All this is why you're a FAILURE, Fingerfuck.

You are posting nothing but pure bullshit. You have no evidence to support your claims. None.

It really doesn't matter, however. Sandmann's lawyer is the one who needs to prove it, and he's quite confident that he has the goods.

 

[bripat9643]

They're in quotes, moron. That means WAPO said them.

Here is one:

The First Article features Nicholas prominently by publication of the @2020fight and/or Taitano Videos and emphasizing his alleged involvement as the “one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.”​

That is what WAPO said, not Nick Sandmann or Phillips.

What’s libelous about that, ******* moron?

Was it where they said he was standing a foot away from the drummer? He was.

Or was it where they said he wore a relentless smirk? He did.

If the phony Indian veteran has gotten in the face of an adult and started his shit, he would have spent the evening at the proctologist's office having his drum extracted. Is that why he picked a child?

There were a hundred students there. If they wanted to get violent, as you suggest an adult would have, Phillips would have had no chance. Fortunately, folks are not as violent as you.

Why do you think that most adults would have suffered the abuse that the phony veteran was dishing out gladly?

Mr. Phillips didn't think that, that's why he decided to pester well behaved children instead of adults.

So you're saying the little shit sized up the old man and figured he could get away with that Smirk?

Tell us something we don't know.

Why shouldn't he get away with it? When did smirking become a crime? If the crazy old coot didn't like it, he was free to relocate himself.

 

[bodecea]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

Harvard bad....bad, bad, bad. Edumacation bad....bad, bad, bad.

 

[Polishprince]

And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!




Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!

Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.

He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.

Oh? What was libelous?

Read the lawsuit, you ******* dumbass.

Yeah we did. Just as I told you to read it and challenged you to find it.

Once again ---- you FAILED.
And you FAILED because it ain't there. That's why you FAILED. If you ever wonder why you FAILED, see this post.
You know, the one that tells you how you FAILED.

Just like that colossal fuckup trying to tell us the Democratic convention meets in December on wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin. Not only did you FAIL to see right through that bullshit blog, you also FAILED to acknowledge your fuckup. All this is why you're a FAILURE, Fingerfuck.

You are posting nothing but pure bullshit. You have no evidence to support your claims. None.

It really doesn't matter, however. Sandmann's lawyer is the one who needs to prove it, and he's quite confident that he has the goods.

Sandmann's lawyer represented the Atlanta security guard that the media was trying to lynch back in 1996 for the park bombing.

BTW, he won big time. If I were Bezos, I'd be concerned.

 

[bripat9643]

I read the complaint and attachments. A few comments. His witness statement attached as Exhibit A was not written by him but by his lawyer or with substantial editing and input from his lawyer. Too much lawyerese to be written by a teenager. Second, there was nothing in the Washington Post articles that indicates who Nick was, where he lived, or his name. Third, there is nothing in the Post story that even comes close to actual malice.

The question is who fingered Nick as the kid. It was not the Washington Post. There may be an out of court settlement, but no where near the amount his lawyers are asking for.

Demonstrating malice isn't required if you aren't a public figure, fuckstick.

Read the complaint dumb ****.

How would that prove malice is required?

Malice isn't required. Just irresponsibility. Especially since it's a minor child.

Know what else is required?

"Evidence".

You lose.

The evidence is all over the forum, shit for brains. You've been defaming Sandman since the whole thing started.

 

[bripat9643]

After many of these media outlets settle with Sandman out of court, he may never have to actually work a day in his life. LOL.

Ah....so THIS is what it's all about....a lazy spoiled brat.

No that's lil Davidd Hogg.

The Harvard bound student??

Harvard bad....bad, bad, bad. Edumacation bad....bad, bad, bad.

Yeah, Harvard bound with a 'C' average.