Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 6,281
- 6,547
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #81
If true, it would have to be brought to whistleblower protections, as the hospital was lying about what they were doing to children.Legally, they seem to have him pretty dead to rights. They have Emails where he indicated he needed to regain remote access to patient files to review urgent adult cases. When his access was restored, he viewed no adult cases, nor anyone in his care. But instead accessed the health information of children not in his care.
That's a clear and blatant violation of Title 42. Just the act of accessing alone was criminal. For each person whose records he accessed, its a crime.
The he disclosed those records (with redactions) to the media. That's also a crime.
Is it a crime to expose lying institutions that are harming the public? The left love their own whistleblowers, but will try to stomp and
Jail this one, who revealed bad truths about their trans religion