Las Vegas shooting: Reports of shooter at Mandalay Bay Casino

[Faun]

Couldn't have been a Muslim.

I don't know. They've been known to do a mass shooting here and there, but that's kind of a white guy thing for the most part.

It's Muslims. Just like France and San Bernadino.

Not a Muslim, ya bigot.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

You should look up State Laws for Firearms and educate yourself before conversing on the subject matter!

I don't need to. I've been on messageboards for 15 years and have had almost every argument there needs to be had on the subject. My argument is a philosophical one, which is what most laws are based on in the first place.

The only argument that matters is that firearms are legal in the USA.

Stop changing the subject!

Because changing the Constitution is moot seeing neither Democrats not Republicans will change or repeal the Second Amendment!

Also the other poster need to read the state laws of each state because of if they do not, well like most of you the reality is you have no clue what the requirements are for each state in the Union!

The Constitution is directly related to the subject. The U.S. Supreme Court supports the opinion that the Constitution guarantees the right of any Tom, Dick, and Harry to own an arsenal.

How does toddlers deaths have anything to do with the mass shooting in Vegas?

CNM introduce the conversation and yet you are demanding I stay on the subject you want and that is banning of all guns.

Also again the point is moot about banning all guns because the requirement to change the Constitution make it impossible seeing the Majority of Democrats and Republicans are for legal gun ownership and States will not agree to repealing of the Second Amendment.

So discuss what this thread is about and not your wish to have guns ban and you do not even live in the states so mind your own business!

Touche!

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Why are you upset at facts?

Also the subject is about mass shooting in Vegas and not toddlers being killed, so who changed the ******* subject asshole?

Watch your language.
I said nothing about toddlers.
Please stay on topic.

CNM did and that poster is the one I was responding to originally and not you. You do not dictate what I can or can not write on this board.

If you have an issue with my response then you and the other poster should have a conversation about why they introduce toddlers deaths to the ******* board!

Of course you will not and claim I changed the toddlers when in fact it was your mind that changed the subject.

Please just stick to shooting deaths in the USA. Thanks.

Again who are You?

First off you do not dictate what I can write on this board!

What part of that can you not understand?

Second, CNM introduce toddlers deaths into the conversation and I pointed out many toddlers die in accidents with autos than firearms which hit a nerve with you because you hate reality.

Finally, you responded to me acting like you can force me to write what you want but then ignore the fact the thread is still about mass shooting in Vegas and not Mass shootings across America.

So stop telling me what I can and can not write when it was your side that introduce toddlers deaths in a mass shooting thread in Vegas!

In fact this thread is not about changing laws either so you should tell others to stop changing the damn subject and if not well then **** off!

Your point is a good one. Toddlers die in cars, people die in cars and no one is calling for a ban on cars. The bottom line is people kill people - not cars, guns, etc. In the right hands there is no danger. Whenever there is a shooting, you'll always find some people looking for a reason to demand that our 2nd Amendment rights be removed. There are communist nations which would love to see America disarmed. NK, China, Russia among others.

Personal responsibility is something the progressives hate.

Those like the one dictating what I should write demand guns should be banned because too many people die at the hands of firearms but introduce facts against their argument and then poof they want to discuss something else.

Banning firearms will not stop terrorist, criminals or rogue governments and disarming the public so someone can pretend they are safe is never the answer.

It amazes me how when their argument is blown to pieces they want rules but when they change the subject the rules do not matter.

In the end the posters calling for the banning of firearms are the ones that do not live here ( usually ) and have no clue what the requirements are to obtain firearms in each state.

They have no clue what it take to repeal an amendment of the Constitution and it could take decades to get States approval.

So in the end all we are doing is arguing with individuals that have no clue about this country or the fact that it is the third largest populated nation in the world, so yeah people will die!

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Americans are infatuated with firearms.

Get over it.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

What is it you don't understand about 'Acceptable Risk'?

I understand you consider the toddler deaths quite acceptable in return for easy firearm access. I've congratulated your honesty. Where is room for misunderstanding?

And I told you firearm access is not 'easy'. And, you don't understand the meaning of 'Acceptable Risk'

A firearm likely saved me and Mrs Geaux4it severe harm, if not death

From my cold dead hands they will ever be taken

-Geaux

LOL What a fool you are, Geaux. I have several guns, long and hand guns. Only the two from Italy, replicas of Civil War era handguns, were there ever any papers filled out. The others were obtained from private individuals. None of them are fast firing assault weapons. And, yes, I have used a gun in self defense. A single shot 12 gauge. Was completely adequate. No need for assault weapons in private hands.

You have no clue what a military grade weapon is... over the counter A.R. 15's are not military grade. Jack weed

To a liberal this is a Military Grade weapon Ruger 10/22

 

[Eloy]

Watch your language.
I said nothing about toddlers.
Please stay on topic.

CNM did and that poster is the one I was responding to originally and not you. You do not dictate what I can or can not write on this board.

If you have an issue with my response then you and the other poster should have a conversation about why they introduce toddlers deaths to the ******* board!

Of course you will not and claim I changed the toddlers when in fact it was your mind that changed the subject.

Please just stick to shooting deaths in the USA. Thanks.

Again who are You?

First off you do not dictate what I can write on this board!

What part of that can you not understand?

Second, CNM introduce toddlers deaths into the conversation and I pointed out my toddlers die in accident with autos than firearms which hit a nerve with you because you hate reality.

Finally, you responded to me acting like you can force me to write what you want but then ignore the fact the thread is still about mass shooting in Vegas and not Mass shootings across America.

So stop telling me what I can and can not write when it was your side that introduce toddlers deaths in a mass shooting thread in Vegas!

In fact this thread is not about changing laws either so you should tell others to stop changing the damn subject and if not well then **** off!

I am only a member of USMessageBoard who prefers that we obey the rules. Otherwise we are distracted by all sorts of stuff. I am not important.

There's pretty well no rules on herding cats... but .. I wouldn't recommend it.

I do not believe the religion of the murderer is significant.

 

[JoeB131]

My predictions.

1) Everyone in this man's life knew he was mentally unstable.
2) He was still able to get guns too easily.

 

[Vastator]

Couldn't have been a Muslim.

I don't know. They've been known to do a mass shooting here and there, but that's kind of a white guy thing for the most part.

It's Muslims. Just like France and San Bernadino.

Not a Muslim, ya bigot.

Your statement is racist. You can't judge a religious affiliation by race. How ironic... From thine own mouth, comes thy judgement...

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Couldn't have been a Muslim.

I don't know. They've been known to do a mass shooting here and there, but that's kind of a white guy thing for the most part.

It's Muslims. Just like France and San Bernadino.

Not a Muslim, ya bigot.

Nope, just an angry white Bernie Supporter who hates happy people.

 

[Rustic]

My predictions.

1) Everyone in this man's life knew he was mentally unstable.
2) He was still able to get guns too easily.

...and people kill people not firearms

 

[sealybobo]

Bullshit.

Less than 1% of all murders happen in mass shootings

.
Probably true. But 1% if the US rate is about all of the rate of some other countries.

You don't understand ratios obviously

The US murder rate is less than 5 per 100000

The vast majority of those murders take place in a handful of urban shit holes

overall whites are more deadly But that's only because there are more of us. We kill our family or sometimes strangers because we snap. If my neighbor snaps and kills his family neighbors are usually in disbelief.

This shooter had an Alaskan hunting license, accountant, white, older,

So why a country music concert?

 

[Eloy]

What is it you don't understand about 'Acceptable Risk'?

I understand you consider the toddler deaths quite acceptable in return for easy firearm access. I've congratulated your honesty. Where is room for misunderstanding?

And I told you firearm access is not 'easy'. And, you don't understand the meaning of 'Acceptable Risk'

A firearm likely saved me and Mrs Geaux4it severe harm, if not death

From my cold dead hands they will ever be taken

-Geaux

LOL What a fool you are, Geaux. I have several guns, long and hand guns. Only the two from Italy, replicas of Civil War era handguns, were there ever any papers filled out. The others were obtained from private individuals. None of them are fast firing assault weapons. And, yes, I have used a gun in self defense. A single shot 12 gauge. Was completely adequate. No need for assault weapons in private hands.

You have no clue what a military grade weapon is... over the counter A.R. 15's are not military grade. Jack weed

To a liberal this is a Military Grade weapon Ruger 10/22

Please, most of us have grown up and no longer play war.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

My predictions.

1) Everyone in this man's life knew he was mentally unstable.
2) He was still able to get guns too easily.

Hell Joe he is just like you.

Moonbattery: Psychiatrist Confirms: Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder

the state — as liberals do.The roots of liberalism — and its associated madness — can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind. When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to ruin the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Someone said they couldn't tell if it was machine gun or helicopter. Hell, I could tell! That was a machine gun. Period. Not buts about it. I heard helicopter too but it sure doesn't sound like what I just heard. And if they were holed up in a motel room at the casino..they had plenty of targets being on the 29nd floor.

"Someone said they couldn't tell if it was machine gun or helicopter. Hell, I could tell! That was a machine gun."

It wasn't a machine gun.

I watched a video of the situation as the concert was happening and the gunshots began to sound. It was a fully automatic assault rifle that to me sounded like an M16 or an AK-47 or an AK-74.

Um, a full auto is a machine gun. That, to my knowledge, is the definition of a machine gun.

Let me help U's out...

---------------------

A machine gun is a fully automatic mounted or portable firearm designed to fire bullets in quick succession from an ammunition belt or magazine, typically at a rate of 300 to 1800 rounds per minute. Not all fully automatic firearms are machine guns. Submachine guns, rifles, assault rifles, shotguns, pistols or cannons may be capable of fully automatic fire, but are not designed for sustained fire. As a class of military rapid-fire guns, machine guns are fully automatic weapons designed to be used as support weapons and generally used when attached to a mount or fired from the ground on a bipod or tripod. Many (but not all) machine guns also use belt feeding and open boltoperation, features not normally found on rifles.

Machine gun - Wikipedia

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Watch your language.
I said nothing about toddlers.
Please stay on topic.

CNM did and that poster is the one I was responding to originally and not you. You do not dictate what I can or can not write on this board.

If you have an issue with my response then you and the other poster should have a conversation about why they introduce toddlers deaths to the ******* board!

Of course you will not and claim I changed the toddlers when in fact it was your mind that changed the subject.

Please just stick to shooting deaths in the USA. Thanks.

Again who are You?

First off you do not dictate what I can write on this board!

What part of that can you not understand?

Second, CNM introduce toddlers deaths into the conversation and I pointed out many toddlers die in accidents with autos than firearms which hit a nerve with you because you hate reality.

Finally, you responded to me acting like you can force me to write what you want but then ignore the fact the thread is still about mass shooting in Vegas and not Mass shootings across America.

So stop telling me what I can and can not write when it was your side that introduce toddlers deaths in a mass shooting thread in Vegas!

In fact this thread is not about changing laws either so you should tell others to stop changing the damn subject and if not well then **** off!

Your point is a good one. Toddlers die in cars, people die in cars and no one is calling for a ban on cars. The bottom line is people kill people - not cars, guns, etc. In the right hands there is no danger. Whenever there is a shooting, you'll always find some people looking for a reason to demand that our 2nd Amendment rights be removed. There are communist nations which would love to see America disarmed. NK, China, Russia among others.

Personal responsibility is something the progressives hate.

Those like the one dictating what I should write demand guns should be banned because too many people die at the hands of firearms but introduce facts against the or argument and then proof they want to discuss something else.

Banning firearms will not stop terrorist, criminals or rogue governments and disarming the public so someone can pretend they are safe is never the answer.

It amazes me how when their argument is blown to pieces they want rules but when they change the subject the rules do not matter.

In the end the posters calling for the banning of firearms are the ones that do not live here ( usually ) and have no clue what the requirements are to obtain firearms in each state.

They have no clue what it take to repeal an amendment of the Constitution and it could take decades to get States approval.

So in the end all we are doing is arguing with individuals that have no clue about this country or the fact that it is the third largest populated nation in the world, so yeah people will die!

Very well said, Bruce. I could not have said it better.

 

[Rustic]

Couldn't have been a Muslim.

I don't know. They've been known to do a mass shooting here and there, but that's kind of a white guy thing for the most part.

It's Muslims. Just like France and San Bernadino.

Not a Muslim, ya bigot.

Bernie Sanders supporter?

 

[Eloy]

My predictions.

1) Everyone in this man's life knew he was mentally unstable.
2) He was still able to get guns too easily.

...and people kill people not firearms

The only way to kill a firearm is to ban it.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Bullshit.

Less than 1% of all murders happen in mass shootings

.
Probably true. But 1% if the US rate is about all of the rate of some other countries.

You don't understand ratios obviously

The US murder rate is less than 5 per 100000

The vast majority of those murders take place in a handful of urban shit holes

overall whites are more deadly But that's only because there are more of us. We kill our family or sometimes strangers because we snap. If my neighbor snaps and kills his family neighbors are usually in disbelief.

This shooter had an Alaskan hunting license, accountant, white, older,

So why a country music concert?

And that is why in Chicago the murder rate is more than white people?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It's near-guaranteed that this goober has a note in a police blotter somewhere, and fell through the cracks as they all seem to do in our current system.

 

[Eloy]

CNM did and that poster is the one I was responding to originally and not you. You do not dictate what I can or can not write on this board.

If you have an issue with my response then you and the other poster should have a conversation about why they introduce toddlers deaths to the ******* board!

Of course you will not and claim I changed the toddlers when in fact it was your mind that changed the subject.

Please just stick to shooting deaths in the USA. Thanks.

Again who are You?

First off you do not dictate what I can write on this board!

What part of that can you not understand?

Second, CNM introduce toddlers deaths into the conversation and I pointed out many toddlers die in accidents with autos than firearms which hit a nerve with you because you hate reality.

Finally, you responded to me acting like you can force me to write what you want but then ignore the fact the thread is still about mass shooting in Vegas and not Mass shootings across America.

So stop telling me what I can and can not write when it was your side that introduce toddlers deaths in a mass shooting thread in Vegas!

In fact this thread is not about changing laws either so you should tell others to stop changing the damn subject and if not well then **** off!

Your point is a good one. Toddlers die in cars, people die in cars and no one is calling for a ban on cars. The bottom line is people kill people - not cars, guns, etc. In the right hands there is no danger. Whenever there is a shooting, you'll always find some people looking for a reason to demand that our 2nd Amendment rights be removed. There are communist nations which would love to see America disarmed. NK, China, Russia among others.

Personal responsibility is something the progressives hate.

Those like the one dictating what I should write demand guns should be banned because too many people die at the hands of firearms but introduce facts against the or argument and then proof they want to discuss something else.

Banning firearms will not stop terrorist, criminals or rogue governments and disarming the public so someone can pretend they are safe is never the answer.

It amazes me how when their argument is blown to pieces they want rules but when they change the subject the rules do not matter.

In the end the posters calling for the banning of firearms are the ones that do not live here ( usually ) and have no clue what the requirements are to obtain firearms in each state.

They have no clue what it take to repeal an amendment of the Constitution and it could take decades to get States approval.

So in the end all we are doing is arguing with individuals that have no clue about this country or the fact that it is the third largest populated nation in the world, so yeah people will die!

Very well said, Bruce. I could not have said it better.

I believe Americans are personally responsible for allowing their country to be awash with firearms.