Not really, unless you can produce evidence to the contrary. There is also the matter of enforcement. The potential for abuse far outweighs any possible benefit.In your subjective, personal opinion – not as a fact of law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not really, unless you can produce evidence to the contrary. There is also the matter of enforcement. The potential for abuse far outweighs any possible benefit.In your subjective, personal opinion – not as a fact of law.
Its video proof by a professional that shows magazine size has no significant effect on load and fire times and there are a ton more that reinforces the argument. Sorry but feelings don't win cases, actual evidence does and I provided that.That's not an argument. Repeating a claim is not an argument for that claim. You would lose the court case in about 30 seconds.
And yet shootings involving high capacity mags have more deaths.The thread is about high-capasity magazines I posted a video showing there is no significant load and fire time between those with less than 10 rounds and more. Arguments to banning them is useless and unconstitutional.
It's only proof of what he can do. Nothing else. Sorry. The data trumps your little bit of preconditioned theater.Its video proof
Just ask Nicholas CruzYou can swap 10 round magazines pretty quick.
Might even make you more careful with your aim.
What does it restrict?"The National Firearms Act of 1934" restricts a lot of things.
A right can't be taxed.You said "And if forced by the government, its an infringement."
And I said, "A lot of things are restricted under the National Firearms Act of 1934."
They can put magazines greater than 10 rounds under the NFA. They won't be banned, just like many fully auto weapons aren't banned. You'll just have to fill out paperwork.
So it's not an infringement if done that way.
your premise is a lieBanning the possession of high-capacity magazines altogether is not an ‘infringement.’
Should the Supreme Court rule that that high-capacity magazine bans are un-Constitutional, then and only then would the enforcement of the ban manifest as an infringement.
30 round magazines are normal capacity, not high capacity.Banning the possession of high-capacity magazines altogether is not an ‘infringement.’
Should the Supreme Court rule that that high-capacity magazine bans are un-Constitutional, then and only then would the enforcement of the ban manifest as an infringement.
The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.
If Iran can have nukes, so can everyone on my street.
Just the circumstantial evidence of reducing capacity,forcing more reloads and forcing someone to carry more clips.
Theidea is that fewer people would die, in a mass shooting. A simple idea.
Just the circumstantial evidence of reducing capacity,forcing more reloads and forcing someone to carry more clips.
Theidea is that fewer people would die, in a mass shooting. A simple idea.
Just the circumstantial evidence of reducing capacity,forcing more reloads and forcing someone to carry more clips.
Theidea is that fewer people would die, in a mass shooting. A simple idea.
Just the circumstantial evidence of reducing capacity,forcing more reloads and forcing someone to carry more clips.
Theidea is that fewer people would die, in a mass shooting. A simple idea.
The thread is about high-capasity magazines I posted a video showing there is no significant load and fire time between those with less than 10 rounds and more. Arguments to banning them is useless and unconstitutional.
And yet shootings involving high capacity mags have more deaths.
So, we can go with your little bit of theater and your specious appeals to emotion, or we can go with the data.
Easy call.
"Shootings involving high-capacity magazines have more fatalities and injuries than those that do not. In mass shootings between 2009 and 2018, events that involved high-capacity magazines had 2x as many deaths and 14x as many injuries."
Prohibit High-Capacity Magazines | Everytown
Nine states and D.C. have enacted high-capacity magazine bans. Congress and the remaining states should also ban them to reduce gun violence in America.www.everytown.org
And yet shootings involving high capacity mags have more deaths.
So, we can go with your little bit of theater and your specious appeals to emotion, or we can go with the data.
Easy call.
"Shootings involving high-capacity magazines have more fatalities and injuries than those that do not. In mass shootings between 2009 and 2018, events that involved high-capacity magazines had 2x as many deaths and 14x as many injuries."
Prohibit High-Capacity Magazines | Everytown
Nine states and D.C. have enacted high-capacity magazine bans. Congress and the remaining states should also ban them to reduce gun violence in America.www.everytown.org
I will refer you to the video again, proof that magazine capacity has no noticeable effect on fire times. You may want to get that comprehension problem looked at.And yet shootings involving high capacity mags have more deaths.
So, we can go with your little bit of theater and your specious appeals to emotion, or we can go with the data.
Easy call.
"Shootings involving high-capacity magazines have more fatalities and injuries than those that do not. In mass shootings between 2009 and 2018, events that involved high-capacity magazines had 2x as many deaths and 14x as many injuries."
Prohibit High-Capacity Magazines | Everytown
Nine states and D.C. have enacted high-capacity magazine bans. Congress and the remaining states should also ban them to reduce gun violence in America.www.everytown.org
Sorry, your staged bit of theater does not trump the data, for any rational person.I will refer you to the video again, proof that magazine capacity has no noticeable effect on fire times. You may want to get that comprehension problem looked at.
Sorry, your staged bit of theater does not trump the data, for any rational person.