Large-capacity gun magazine possession law on pause while Supreme Court petitioned

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"A federal appeals court has agreed to put on hold a law that makes it illegal to possess a gun magazine holding more than 10 bullets, to see if the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the case."

Large-capacity gun magazine possession law on pause while Supreme Court petitioned

Possession of magazines holding more than 10 bullets won't be enforced for now despite the 9th Circuit upholding California law

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

Those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures have been disappointed in the past when this conservative High Court refused to grant cert to challenges to such bans.

And even if the Court agreed to hear the case, will those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures be again disappointed when the justices determine to narrowly consider only the possession provision of the law, leaving in place the prohibition to sell, manufacture, or buy large-capacity magazines, similar to the narrow determination in the New York may issue carry permit provision now under review.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures have been disappointed in the past when this conservative High Court refused to grant cert to challenges to such bans.

Says the known liar.

 

[Weatherman2020]

"A federal appeals court has agreed to put on hold a law that makes it illegal to possess a gun magazine holding more than 10 bullets, to see if the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the case."

Large-capacity gun magazine possession law on pause while Supreme Court petitioned

Possession of magazines holding more than 10 bullets won't be enforced for now despite the 9th Circuit upholding California law

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

Those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures have been disappointed in the past when this conservative High Court refused to grant cert to challenges to such bans.

And even if the Court agreed to hear the case, will those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures be again disappointed when the justices determine to narrowly consider only the possession provision of the law, leaving in place the prohibition to sell, manufacture, or buy large-capacity magazines, similar to the narrow determination in the New York may issue carry permit provision now under review.

The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.
If Iran can have nukes, so can everyone on my street.

 

[daveman]

 

[Otis Mayfield]

You can swap 10 round magazines pretty quick.

Might even make you more careful with your aim.

 

[okfine]

The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.
If Iran can have nukes, so can everyone on my street.

Iran? Where are you?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You can swap 10 round magazines pretty quick.
Might even make you more careful with your aim.

You can also go to chrch one a month.
Might make you pay better attention.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.

George Washington, unquestionably, would have been delighted at the propect of each of his potential miliamen, and all of his frontier families, having an AR15 above their transom and a dozen or so loaded 30-rd magazines in their cartridge box.

 

[Otis Mayfield]

You can also go to chrch one a month.
Might make you pay better attention.

You jest, but it's so true.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You jest, but it's so true.

And if forced by the government, its an infringement.

 

[1srelluc]

I wonder if MagPul can flood CA with 20-30 rounders during those 150 days.

 

[Vrenn]

"A federal appeals court has agreed to put on hold a law that makes it illegal to possess a gun magazine holding more than 10 bullets, to see if the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the case."

Large-capacity gun magazine possession law on pause while Supreme Court petitioned

Possession of magazines holding more than 10 bullets won't be enforced for now despite the 9th Circuit upholding California law

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

Those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures have been disappointed in the past when this conservative High Court refused to grant cert to challenges to such bans.

And even if the Court agreed to hear the case, will those hostile to Constitutional firearm regulatory measures be again disappointed when the justices determine to narrowly consider only the possession provision of the law, leaving in place the prohibition to sell, manufacture, or buy large-capacity magazines, similar to the narrow determination in the New York may issue carry permit provision now under review.

Already, two district courts have thrown out the 10 round mag max. But they have allowed 15 rounds using Heller V.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Says the known liar.

It is a fact that conservatives have been frustrated with the Court’s refusal to hear certain cases, such as AWBs.

Supreme Court declines to hear host of gun rights cases

The justices declined to take up the contentious matter of gun rights in the United States.

www.cbsnews.com

Consequently, you’re the liar.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.
If Iran can have nukes, so can everyone on my street.

Both ignorant and wrong.

Another rightwing liar chimes in – having nothing to do with the thread premise.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And if forced by the government, its an infringement.

Wrong.

All acts of government are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise; and until the Court rules, there is no ‘infringement.’

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Already, two district courts have thrown out the 10 round mag max. But they have allowed 15 rounds using Heller V.

This makes no sense and has nothing to do with the thread topic.

The topic is will the Supreme Court frustrate and disappoint conservatives once again by either refusing to hear the case or if they hear the case, rule only narrowly concerning the possession provision.

 

[Flash]

The Founding Fathers wanted and allowed citizens to own every weapon the military had.
If Iran can have nukes, so can everyone on my street.

The term "Well Regulated" in the Second Amendment means to be well provisioned like having standard capacity magazines.

By the way, in the Miller case the Supreme Court stated that the Second protected weapons in common use by the military. Miller was found guilty because the Court (erroneously) determined that his short barreled shotgun was not used by the military. They were used in WWI.

 

[M14 Shooter]

All acts of government are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise;

Like... the TX abortion law.
Glad you agree.
Why don't you ever mention this to those whining and crying about the unvconstitutionalitu of said law?
I mean, other than the fact you're a liar?

 

[M14 Shooter]

It is a fact that conservatives have been frustrated...

You intentional failure to understand I was addressing you, not what you said..
Nothing here changes the fact you are a known liar.
Except the fact you intentionally misunderstood what I said, of course.

 

[Otis Mayfield]

And if forced by the government, its an infringement.

"The National Firearms Act of 1934" restricts a lot of things.