Kurt Schlichter: We are totally going to crush the Dem's Puny Lawfare Offensive

[martybegan]

It’s a wild ruling and was appropriately demolished when it came to the Supreme Court. The preliminary injunction was total bullshit and makes no sense. The plaintiffs couldn’t show irreparable harm by being kicked off social media, and they couldn’t even show that the government had anything to do with them being kicked off social media.

Yet one district court judge was able to dictate the manner in which the government could communicate with a company, as if that’s anywhere within their authority.

Total bullshit.

it was dismissed on standing, not on the merits. Try reading things first.

 

[Marener]

it was dismissed on standing, not on the merits. Try reading things first.

And why didn’t they have standing exactly? Did you read that?

 

[martybegan]

And why didn’t they have standing exactly? Did you read that?

because the SC punted?

 

[Billiejeens]

Here's what's going to stop the DOGE revolution.

When people don't get their checks and services promptly.

Then the South African Vampire will be offered up as the scapegoat, and X will be vilifying Trump again.

You don't understand the story

SHOCK

 

[Marener]

because the SC punted?

You didn’t read. Try reading things first.

Or maybe you did read it but you don’t want to admit the answer. That’s more likely. You’re smart, but also very pathetic.

 

[martybegan]

You didn’t read. Try reading things first.

Or maybe you did read it but you don’t want to admit the answer. That’s more likely. You’re smart, but also very pathetic.

When they don't debate the merits and go with standing, they are punting.

It means they didn't even look at the reasoning of the suit.

 

[Marener]

When they don't debate the merits and go with standing, they are punting.

Again, you fail to admit why they lacked standing.

You’re pathetic.

 

[martybegan]

Again, you fail to admit why they lacked standing.

You’re pathetic.

Because they decided there was no harm. That's always why you decide they lack standing. It's a punt

 

[Marener]

Because they decided there was no harm.

Not exactly.

They decided that the government didn’t harm them.

So how can a case have any merit when the person being sued didn’t actually harm them?

 

[martybegan]

Not exactly.

They decided that the government didn’t harm them.

So how can a case have any merit when the person being sued didn’t actually harm them?

They couldn't produce DIRECT harm, but that doesn't mean the government was doing the right thing.

Do you want the government telling social media companies what ideas to suppress?

 

[Marener]

They couldn't produce DIRECT harm, but that doesn't mean the government was doing the right thing.

They couldn’t show evidence of ANY harm. That means their case had NO merits to discuss.

Either way, the district court was illegitimately limiting what the president could do and the injunction was baseless.

But you’re okay with it because you don’t like Biden.

 

[martybegan]

They couldn’t show evidence of ANY harm. That means their case had NO merits to discuss.

Either way, the district court was illegitimately limiting what the president could do and the injunction was baseless.

But you’re okay with it because you don’t like Biden.

That doesn't mean someone wasn't harmed.

Again, do you want Biden or Trump or their people pressuring social media companies with government power, yes or no?

 

[Marener]

Again, do you want Biden or Trump or their people pressuring social media companies with government power, yes or no?

Nope. They shouldn’t use government power against social media companies.

Biden didn’t.

Republicans do. Repeatedly. It’s okay with you because you’re a partisan hack.

 

[martybegan]

Nope. They shouldn’t use government power against social media companies.

Biden didn’t.

Republicans do. Repeatedly. It’s okay with you because you’re a partisan hack.

Biden's people sure has hell did, it's why they sued them.

Again, you ignore the actual merits of the case, same as the SC did by punting.

The only silencers in this political spectrum come from the left.

We think you people are ******* retarded, you don't want us to exist.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

When they don't debate the merits and go with standing, they are punting.

It means they didn't even look at the reasoning of the suit.

No, if the courts don't agree with you does not mean they are punting.

 

[Marener]

Biden's people sure has hell did, it's why they sued them.

As SCOTUS pointed out, no there’s no evidence that they did.

Again, you ignore the actual merits of the case, same as the SC did by punting.

No merits.

The only silencers in this political spectrum come from the left.

Musk does a fine job silencing plenty of people ok Twitter.

We think you people are ******* retarded, you don't want us to exist.

When you guys started pushing lies that got people hurt, you crossed a line.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Beating them at their own game will have lasting impacts on how Trump can proceed with his agenda.

Stacked Deck

Why play their game at all?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Then the South African Vampire

Will Garlic Cure TDS?

 

[BluesLegend]

It's clear Democrats are trying to STALL until 2026 when they will try to STEAL enough elections to regain control of the House so they can IMPEACH Trump a 3rd time.

 

[dudmuck]

So here's a take on why all these cases are going to crash and burn, and Trump is doing the right thing by not just ignoring them.

We Are Totally Going to Crush the Democrats' Puny Lawfare Offensive



They were hoping for Trump to just ignore them, but he isn't falling for it, at least so far.

He points out a few of the issues with these orders, all big ones.

One of them:



His view is wait until the SC steps in, because he believes Roberts et al don't want to set a precedent of some district court being able to shut out the appointed officials from doing what the elected President wants done.

Judges only follow the law. Careful with accusations of political influence when there is none.