Kristi Noem Says We're Ready To Deal With Those Blue Cities

SHe's not at the skeet range. She's the head of Homeland Security. Act like it.
TRIGGER.webp
 
I seriously doubt that, when you take into consideration mileage.

Alaska is almost as big as the rest of the US.

And you can't judge a state by how many people you can pack into it.
I think Alaskans want to be part of Canada, a new province.

I wonder if Canada will close their border, be a ***** for Alaskans trying to drive home from Vegas.
 
.

I love the strength and resolve of this woman, born of running ranching and farming operations all her life, and then governing a state through the covid thing with no loss of jobs or businesses. Keep in mind, she faced down the indians on the res when they were sucking the tit of the cartels.

That's how we grow them in the Midwest.

And for those of you who vote with the little head, she looks hot in the new Border Patrol uniform.


Arrest anyone and everyone who tries to stop them from carrying out federal law, even if it is all democrats.
 
Arrest anyone and everyone who tries to stop them from carrying out federal law, even if it is all democrats.

When is Trump introducing the new oath? surely that's just an executive order away...



On Monday, Trump made a move that belongs in the latter camp. Disregarding the formal process that is required by law before nonpolitical federal civil servants can be terminated, Trump’s acting attorney general, James McHenry, summarily fired more than a dozen justice department career prosecutors.

All of those fired had been assigned to the two federal criminal investigations of Trump pursued by the former special counsel Jack Smith in the classified documents and January 6 cases.

In a letter informing the attorneys of their termination, McHenry wrote that their involvement in the cases was the impetus for their firing. “Given your significant role in prosecuting the president,” McHenry wrote, “I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implementing the president’s agenda faithfully.”

 
Last edited:
Hook, line and sinker.

Oh, please don't ever go away.

You're too much fun.

We do not like to admit it, but it may be time to state plainly what many of us already know: that Trump has already largely remade our constitutional order. Powers that no one would have imagined that the president had just two weeks ago, when the office was occupied by a Democrat, are noddingly assumed to be within his purview now.

It is hardly a debate, now, whether the president has the power to impose tariffs without the cooperation of Congress, though the legal question is far from settled; it is assumed that his bizarre directives to suspend funding that has already been appropriated by Congress must be obeyed. The firing of the prosecutors is a transparent overreach, but it is not clear that anyone will be able to stop him: if the lawyers sue to try to enforce their own rights as civil servants – or to try to force the president to recognize the limits of his own power – it seems perfectly likely that the large number of Trump-appointed judges on the federal bench will retroactively rewrite the law to say that Trump, if not other presidents, has in fact had this power all along.


You'll understand one day, you're a fake Catholic just like you're a fake American.
 
15th post
Precious!

Absolutely precious! It reads TheGuardian!

At least I can read, why don't you take reading lessons? you'll be able to make less idiotic posts perhaps.

I can see why your loyal and admiring of Trump, it's been a Catholic thing for centuries...

1738359875773.png



1738359915226.png
 
Last edited:
ICE Barbie refused to answer Hypocrite Laura's question about "going after" some mayors.

I've been wracking my brain trying to recall any incidence of a Fox News hack asking a politician if they were going to "go after" the sheriffs refusing to do their duty and enforce totally constitutional red flag laws.
Oh good. The faggoty libturds have a new pet phrase.

🙄
 
I challenge you to quit posting until he says that.
What do you think he will use to insist and prove that new recruits to the justice department and FBI are not a risk to him?

He'll do something, might be a signed loyalty contract for all we know but he will do it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom