Kim Davis Is Rosa Parks

[playtime]

Perhaps because the American Right has grown weary and alarmed over the slippery slope that the goddamned Left has contrived for us to slide down?

Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

oopsie, bubba.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Kim Davis represents what the Framers sought to prevent when they created our Constitutional Republic, whose citizens are subject solely to the rule of law, not men, as men are incapable of ruling justly – Davis' refusal to obey the rule of law as she swore to do as an officer of the state is proof of that.

Kim Davis represents those who are ignorant of, or hold contempt for, the rule of law, by seeking to propagate the lie that Article VI of the Constitution and its jurisprudence 'violates' her religious beliefs, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

And Kim Davis represents those who would seek to contrive a 'controversy' where none exists for some perceived partisan gain.

Kim Davis represents much of what's wrong with the American right: the ignorance, the unwarranted fear of change and diversity, and the contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law.

Perhaps because the American Right has grown weary and alarmed over the slippery slope that the goddamned Left has contrived for us to slide down?

Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

 

[Kondor3]

Perhaps because the American Right has grown weary and alarmed over the slippery slope that the goddamned Left has contrived for us to slide down?

Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

oopsie, bubba.

Don't over-think it, Princess, or you'll blow a gasket...

Now, do you have anything topical to add, or are you just trolling?

 

[Kondor3]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

 

[daws101]

Kim Davis represents what the Framers sought to prevent when they created our Constitutional Republic, whose citizens are subject solely to the rule of law, not men, as men are incapable of ruling justly – Davis' refusal to obey the rule of law as she swore to do as an officer of the state is proof of that.

Kim Davis represents those who are ignorant of, or hold contempt for, the rule of law, by seeking to propagate the lie that Article VI of the Constitution and its jurisprudence 'violates' her religious beliefs, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

And Kim Davis represents those who would seek to contrive a 'controversy' where none exists for some perceived partisan gain.

Kim Davis represents much of what's wrong with the American right: the ignorance, the unwarranted fear of change and diversity, and the contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law.

Perhaps because the American Right has grown weary and alarmed over the slippery slope that the goddamned Left has contrived for us to slide down?

more likely the right has fallen into the trap of ignorance and bigotry that it blames others for.

 

[daws101]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

 

[Kondor3]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

Thank you for your feedback.

 

[David_42]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

Thank you for your feedback.

 

[Kondor3]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

Thank you for your feedback.

Proving what?

 

[David_42]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

Thank you for your feedback.

Proving what?

Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

 

[Kondor3]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

 

[David_42]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

 

[Kondor3]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

 

[David_42]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

 

[Kondor3]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

Troll here much, little butt-buddy?

Now, if it isn't too much trouble, do you have anything of substance to add to the conversation?

 

[David_42]

...Anyone defending Kim Davis deserves to be mocked, the lady is a bigoted idiot.

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

Troll here much, little butt-buddy?

Now, if it isn't too much trouble, do you have anything of substance to add to the conversation?

Nothing to add, there is no argument defending Kim Davis, unless you're a verified nut.

 

[Kondor3]

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

Troll here much, little butt-buddy?

Now, if it isn't too much trouble, do you have anything of substance to add to the conversation?

Nothing to add, there is no argument defending Kim Davis, unless you're a verified nut.

If you have nothing to add, I suggest you move on, rather than trolling or stalking, which violates USMB guidelines, last time I looked.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Uhhhhh... yeah... sure... thank you.

Oh, she's one butt-ugly woman, alright.

Now, if you're done throwing rocks at her with silly picture-memes...

Any new substance to add?

Troll here much, little butt-buddy?

Now, if it isn't too much trouble, do you have anything of substance to add to the conversation?

Nothing to add, there is no argument defending Kim Davis, unless you're a verified nut.

Correct.

Davis is comprehensively wrong, beyond dispute – her 'argument' is completely devoid of merit, absolutely in conflict with settled, accepted Constitutional jurisprudence holding that rulings of the Supreme Court are the law of the land, binding on the states and local jurisdictions, in no way 'violating' religious liberty or the 'will of the people.'

 

[Syriusly]

Kim Davis Is Rosa Parks

Weird thing is today's democrats hate this woman for standing for religious freedom,1950-1960's democrats were the members of the klan and the ones that wanted blacks at back of the bus! I see not much has changed.

Tell us how more about how you admire Rosa Parks.

 

[daws101]

...Ignorance of, or contempt for, the law is not justification to violate the law.

Isn't Civil Disobedience fun?

what you claim as civil disobedience is analogous to spoiled over indulged children throwing tantrums after being taken in hand.
conservatives can't manage the real thing.

Thank you for your feedback.

Proving what?

it's called humor you either get it or you don't
however it does point out her lack of credibility.....