Kill! Kill! Kill!

[PoliticalChic]

Trump is a “blunt instrument for us,” ALT RIGHT EXTREMIST Steve Bannon told Vanity Fair last summer. “I don’t know whether he really gets it or not.”

Is Donald Trump Just a Pawn in Steve Bannon’s Game?

Seems it was particularly easy defeating you today......



....all I had to do was forbid you from changing the topic, and off you went.



"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter

 

[eagle1462010]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

No but the US does it.

Only an idiot would compare us to ISIS...........who's goal is the end of the world..........That is their grand plan.........

That is the dark side of Islam...............where brain cells go to die.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

"kill kill kill"

I see you decided to post your own personal motto.

Clearly you are incapable of actually responding to any topic that runs counter to the Liberal lies you've incorporated.


Dismissed, with the usual failing grade.

 

[PoliticalChic]

NO

Any suggestions?

The answer is a riddle..............

What will eventually happen is inevitable..........History repeats...........always does..........

What will happen is a question of when and not if.

This is history:

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent." The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History

But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.




Now.....where is that 'repetition'?

 

[PoliticalChic]

NO

Any suggestions?

A second Crusade.

View attachment 266959

Didn't work out so well.....

Sure you want to do that again?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

No but the US does it.

What a stupid post.


You continue to work up to your ability.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

No but the US does it.

Only an idiot would compare us to ISIS...........who's goal is the end of the world..........That is their grand plan.........

That is the dark side of Islam...............where brain cells go to die.

But that is an idiot to whom you are responding.

 

[eagle1462010]

NO

Any suggestions?

The answer is a riddle..............

What will eventually happen is inevitable..........History repeats...........always does..........

What will happen is a question of when and not if.

This is history:

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent." The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History

But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.




Now.....where is that 'repetition'?

#13. Charles Martel

 

[Terri4Trump]

Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

Of course not. Islam is barbaric. They are stuck in medieval times.

Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

That's what they do in your homeland, North Korea.

That was uncalled for you punk.

 

[Terri4Trump]

No but the US does it.

The US does not act like barbaric Islamo-Fascist terrorist, and you are a lowlife pig for suggesting otherwise.

 

[Likkmee]

Pershing had the right idea: Grease the bullets with lard and shoot them.

crop dusters.Then they just stand still under an umbrella and starve to death.

 

[eagle1462010]

NO

Any suggestions?

A second Crusade.

View attachment 266959

Didn't work out so well.....

Sure you want to do that again?

We fight with our hands tied behind our backs..............and appease to the point of giving the enemy advantage because of rules..............

Then we forget the Art of War..........

 

[PoliticalChic]

NO

Any suggestions?

The answer is a riddle..............

What will eventually happen is inevitable..........History repeats...........always does..........

What will happen is a question of when and not if.

This is history:

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent." The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History

But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.




Now.....where is that 'repetition'?

#13. Charles Martel

If you are a Charles Martel fan, pick up a copy of this book....

 

[eagle1462010]

NO

Any suggestions?

The answer is a riddle..............

What will eventually happen is inevitable..........History repeats...........always does..........

What will happen is a question of when and not if.

This is history:

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent." The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History

But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.




Now.....where is that 'repetition'?

#13. Charles Martel

If you are a Charles Martel fan, pick up a copy of this book....

And had he lost .............hmmmm...........This was the beginning of the crusades to take back territory by Caliphates...........

Riddle me this.............who owned Spain in the time of Martel.........

 

[PoliticalChic]

NO

Any suggestions?

A second Crusade.

View attachment 266959

Didn't work out so well.....

Sure you want to do that again?

We fight with our hands tied behind our backs..............and appease to the point of giving the enemy advantage because of rules..............

Then we forget the Art of War..........

True of both America and the UK......the elites have sold us out.



The previous regime was directed by an Islamist, and in the two countries there is some abject fear of antagonizing thugs and murderers.


Pretty good analysis here:

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

But remember over a thousand years ago, those evil Christians were killing Muslims in the crusades, so it is okay for Muslims to kill as Obama put it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Any suggestions?

The answer is a riddle..............

What will eventually happen is inevitable..........History repeats...........always does..........

What will happen is a question of when and not if.

This is history:

"The military history of Islam and the West covers a thousand years, from the Battle of Yarmuk (636) until 1683. For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain [711] to the second Turkish siege of Vienna [1683], Europe was under constant threat from Islam," Bernard Lewis elaborates: "All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers... North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe.

Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe," as wave after wave of Islamic attacks crashed against the continent." The Dire Consequences of Rewriting Western-Muslim History

But the King of Poland, John III Sobieski, relieved the siege of Vienna, routed the largest Muslim army ever assembled, and the Pope proclaimed September 12th as a feast day.

“The Holy League formed under Pope Innocent, spearheaded by Sobieski’s Poles and the Austro-German forces, …went on the offensive against the Turks. Two years later, Orthodox Russia joined the Catholic League. Between 1683 and 1697, fifteen major battles were fought between the Turks and the Christians, twelve won by the latter.” Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 279.




Now.....where is that 'repetition'?

#13. Charles Martel

If you are a Charles Martel fan, pick up a copy of this book....

And had he lost .............hmmmm...........This was the beginning of the crusades to take back territory by Caliphates...........

Riddle me this.............who owned Spain in the time of Martel.........

Second siege of Vienna.....give Sobieski credit.

 

[eagle1462010]

"Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island
Officials say local affiliate Abu Sayyaf was likely behind blast that targeted elite army unit"
Philippines: Isis claims bombing that killed five on Jolo island

Another day...another Muslim slaughter in the news....




1.In a study of the historicity of Islam, several rather significant…and dramatic… issues stand out.

First, it is based on 7th century tribal aims, meaning the dominance of one’s tribe over all others.

Second, the design for domination is not to win over others by good works and good examples, but rather by murder and threats.

Third, and most essential in understanding the contemporary ramifications, unlike Judeo-Christian iterations, it has not undergone a reformation: these same doctrines apply for large segments of the Muslim ummah, community:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Kill those who insult Islam or the Prophet

C) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

H) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys




2. If we choose as a Litmus Test the sanctity of human life, then we find Islam, Marxism, Nazism, Progressivism, Liberalism, and every Democrat candidate for the presidency on the same side. Edwin Black in his book, “ The Farhud: The Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust” points to the extermination of the Jews of Medina represents the iconic moment in Islam, just as the Sermon on the Mount is the iconic moment of Christianity, or the parting of the Red Sea is for the Jews.



3. “Christians and Jews....the more devout, the less violent. Not so with Islam.” Bill Donohue

Should there be any doubt as to the truth of this statement, consider the Salman Rushdie event…
This is what passed for normal in the Muslim community.

'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'
Melanie Phillips

In 1988, the novelist and British citizen Salman Rushdie published his novel, The Satanic Verses. A bitter satire on Islam which understandably gave serious offence, its publication provoked uproar in the Islamic world ….in Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, sentencing Rushdie to death for writing the book, …As a result, Rushdie was forced to go into hiding for many years and to live the life of a highly guarded fugitive, with a bounty on his head for anyone who succeeded in killing him.

Sayed Abdul Quddus, the secretary of the Bradford Council of Mosques, claimed that Rushdie had 'tortured Islam' and deserved to pay the penalty by 'hanging'.

Speaking in Bradford, where the first demonstrations against the book took place, he said: 'Muslims here would kill him and I would willingly sacrifice my own life and that of my children to carry out the ayatollah's wishes should the opportunity arise.' Dr Kalim Siddiqui, director of the Iranian-backed Muslim Institute, shouted at a meeting: 'I would like every Muslim to raise his hand in agreement with the death sentence on Salman Rushdie. Let the world see that every Muslim agrees that this man should be put away.'”
'After the Rushdie affair, Islam in Britain became fused with an agenda of murder'



Is murder an acceptable method of spreading a faith?????

But remember over a thousand years ago, those evil Christians were killing Muslims in the crusades, so it is okay for Muslims to kill as Obama put it.

And why did I mention Martel...........what was the goal of the Caliphates that helped cause the environment of the Crusades............easy to say it now.........

Europe nearly fell to Muslim Conquest.

 

[eagle1462010]

Killing is sometimes necessary...........avoided at every opportunity...........but happens.......



History always repeats itself..............

 

[PoliticalChic]

Killing is sometimes necessary...........avoided at every opportunity...........but happens.......



History always repeats itself..............

I'm not opposed to killing.

I'm opposed to killing innocents.

Obama provided the weapon to Nikolas Cruz at Parkland

Democrats endorse infanticide

Muslims kill those who aren't Muslim