Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Could Walk

Horse hockey.

We were safe, huh? Tell that to the thousands who died needlessly in Iraq. Tell that to our country which is BITTERLY divided after being completed united on 9/12. Tell that to national debt that doubled under BOOOOOOOOOOOOSH. Tell that to nation's collective 401k.

This country BROKE under BOOOOOOOOSH while you mother fuckers cheered him on.
Funny, a Marine friend of mine lost a buddy in Iraq during a night ambush, and has two who are permanently disabled - one is blind, one is paralyzed - yet none of them involved or the deceased's family believes their losses were needless.

Denial is a magnificent coping mechanism.

So is Blame, Obfuscation, and Minimization. What's yer point?
 
It's funny that you talk shit like that yet the terrorists managed to nearly break this country under BOOOOOOOOOOOSH.

Get over yourself.


We were safe under Booooooooooooooooooooosh for the remainder of his term, the same can't be said for your guy Obama, the recent terrorist attack at Ford Hood where 13 were murdered and another 30+ injured is a primo example.

Horse hockey.

We were safe, huh? Tell that to the thousands who died needlessly in Iraq. Tell that to our country which is BITTERLY divided after being completed united on 9/12. Tell that to national debt that doubled under BOOOOOOOOOOOOSH. Tell that to nation's collective 401k.

This country BROKE under BOOOOOOOOSH while you mother fuckers cheered him on.

Those thousands that died in Iraq freed millions of Muslims, they did not die needlessly, they also took out a tyrant who was in fast pursuit of nuclear weapons, in which he would have used and held the middle east hostage with. He had at one time weapons of mass destruction of which he used on Iranians. EVERY LEADER IN EVERY COUNTRY for the last 30 years knew and was convinced of those WMD's. Had George Bush not taken out Sadam, you would have been the first one in line, screaming at the top of your lungs, SADDAM HAS WMD'S and BUSH IS TOO MUCH OF A COWARD TO CONFRONT HIM.:lol::lol:

The national debt doubled under Bush, but that has since QUADRUPLED under your guy.

The nations collective 401k can be traced back to the democratic party of the 1970's called "the Fair Housing Act," in which Bank's were forced by the GOVERNMENT to make high risk mortgage loans or be red-lined to open up new branch offices, thereby, limiting their growth and opportunities. The government under the democrats started that snow ball rollin and Barny Frank ended up with it, right up his fat ass.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Get some education and some history, maybe your brain will work a little better next time.
 
[Those thousands that died in Iraq freed millions of Muslims, they did not die needlessly, they also took out a tyrant who was in fast pursuit of nuclear weapons, .

HUH?

The pussies may have been hot but I don't think that they were nuclear.

Quit bullshitting, the ONLY thing Saddam like to do was to get laid, he wasn't suicidal.

He invaded Iran in order to please President Reagan.

No EVIDENCE that he had WMD's or was seeking to acquire WMD's. The whole fucking concept is a figment of the neocrazies and warmongers imagination.

.
 
If he does walk it will be due to the inadmissability of evidence gained through torture.

Maybe we should get him a cell with Dick Cheney
 
[Those thousands that died in Iraq freed millions of Muslims, they did not die needlessly, they also took out a tyrant who was in fast pursuit of nuclear weapons, .

HUH?

The pussies may have been hot but I don't think that they were nuclear.

Quit bullshitting, the ONLY thing Saddam like to do was to get laid, he wasn't suicidal.

He invaded Iran in order to please President Reagan.

No EVIDENCE that he had WMD's or was seeking to acquire WMD's. The whole fucking concept is a figment of the neocrazies and warmongers imagination.

.

A little history for someone who is in dire need of it. :lol::lol::lol: I guess those warmongers would include President Carter, President Clinton, President Reagan, the !st George Bush, Margaret Thatcher, and ALL other world LEADERS FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS. BTW- Reagan did not support Suddam he supported Iran, remember the Iran contra deal.:lol::lol:

The Iran-Iraq War

Arms For for Hostages
In the midst of the war, the United States changed its position and unexpectedly helped the Iranians. In 1985, the Reagan Administration agreed to secretly sell weapons to Iran to win support for the freeing of American hostages being held by terrorists in Lebanon. The principal negotiator on the U.S. side was Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, a military aide to the National Security Council, who reported his activities to the National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane and his successor John Poindexter.

When the exchange was revealed, it proved embarrassing because of Reagan's oft-stated pledge not to negotiate with terrorists and his claim not to have traded arms for hostages. The situation was further complicated by the disclosure that part of the proceeds of the arms sale had been diverted to support the Contra rebels fighting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua; this was in violation of a law prohibiting U.S. aid to the Contras.

If this was not convoluted enough, the initial sales to Iran were made through Israel. The Iran-Contra Affair, as it came to be known, tarnished Reagan's image, but he was ultimately found to have had no direct knowledge of the secret operation.
 
Last edited:
Another link for the historically challenged libs on this thread who actually believe that Saddam never had WMD's and that that evil Booooooooooooooooooooosh made it all up. ROTHLMAO

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



During the Presidency of Saddam Hussein, the nation of Iraq used, possessed, and made efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Hussein was internationally known for his use of chemical weapons in the 1980s against Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. It is also known that in the 1980s he pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program.

After the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War, the United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi WMD and related equipment and materials throughout the early 1990s, with varying degrees of Iraqi cooperation and obstruction.


Then you have 9-11, everyone is thinking that Saddam still has large quantities of WMD and that he will let terrorists have them to use on U.S citizens. What would you do? Sit on your hands. Dither as we are seeing the current President do in Afghanistan, or would you take action. As my commander in chief, responsible for the safety of my family and children, I want you to take action. As I stated earlier, had Bush done nothing, the libs would be screaming about Saddam today, stating he has WMD and Bush was too much of a coward to do anything about it. Hell, Obama would be saying that. LOL One thing we know for sure, is there is no more Saddam to have to deal with and he was one hell of a terrorist to his neighbors and to his own people.
 
Last edited:
It's funny that you talk shit like that yet the terrorists managed to nearly break this country under BOOOOOOOOOOOSH.

Get over yourself.


We were safe under Booooooooooooooooooooosh for the remainder of his term, the same can't be said for your guy Obama, the recent terrorist attack at Ford Hood where 13 were murdered and another 30+ injured is a primo example.

Horse hockey.

We were safe, huh? Tell that to the thousands who died needlessly in Iraq. Tell that to our country which is BITTERLY divided after being completed united on 9/12. Tell that to national debt that doubled under BOOOOOOOOOOOOSH. Tell that to nation's collective 401k.

This country BROKE under BOOOOOOOOSH while you mother fuckers cheered him on.


Ok step away from the kool aide. first off Obama has already spent more on nothing than Bush spent on Iraq in 5 years.

And my troops did not die for nothing. Nearly the entire world believe Saddam had stockpiled WMD. He admitted that he wanted Iran to believe that.

And yes we were United on 9/12/01 right up to the day that some politician needed to be re-elected. Then that United sort of went to shit real fast.

But the world did change on 9-11-01 and if we don't get away from this PC bull shit and Change some with it, we may be lost. I Hope we survive the Change until 2010 and 2012
 
BTW- Reagan did not support Suddam he supported Iran, .

handshake300.jpg




Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein:

The U.S. Tilts toward Iraq, 1980-1984

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 82

Edited by Joyce Battle

February 25, 2003
 
During the Presidency of Saddam Hussein, the nation of Iraq used, possessed, and made efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMD). .

story.jpg


Scott Ritter

The controversial former chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq says Saddam's weapons of mass destruction are largely disarmed, the "Iraqi threat" is built on a framework of lies and President Bush has betrayed the American people
 
I doubt he will walk , What happens when the lawyers have no defense they, put the government on trial.
What will defiantly happen is Ilsam will get it chance its make its case for jihad.
Western culture will be put on trial .The progressives and there Islamic allies with get to further denigrate the west and further shake confidence in the foundations of Free speech capitalism liberty and justice.
With the Media and progressives pulling down the west, it will be a giant step to destroying the west.


This will also expose what our CIA did to capture him and if there are any missteps, example, the non reading of miranda rights, it's quite possible that he could be set free.

Cops don't have to read miranda rights any longer and the CIA has no jurisdiction over American citizens, the FBI does. Besides the scum bag is not a citizen of this country, therefore the CIA has jurisdiction and since he is not a citizen does not have to read him any rights.


The point is--that N.Y City which is currently loaded with Muslims will be put at risk--to put these monsters on trial in New York City civilian courts. Civilian courts in this country are for people who committ CRIMES--not Acts of WAR--DUH.

The only people these trials will benefit will be Al Queda--who will learn through these trials how we find them, & obtain information.

This is the President you voted for--so I hope you're totally satisfied with all the Hopey & Changey B.S.
 
As if the disrespect for America was not sickening enough coming out of the White House, it just got worse!

Non American's, who under the banner of war, attacked and killed more than 3,000 American's and injured so many more on 9/11 are going to be awarded the honor of our constitutional rights!

WHY?

Do they deserve fair proceedings? Of course, as American's we cannot permit any less. However, they do not deserve the protections of our Constitution and Bill of Rights!

It is a slap in the face to each American and even worse to the victims of 9/11 and their loved ones!

They are enemy combative's and deserve a Military proceeding. No more, no less. That provides them fair due process and that is more than they would ever consider giving any American!

IMO ........This White House is getting worse by the day!

Mike
 
Just ask Daniel Pearl, and others they had captured and videotaped their beheading. No quarter to these bastards. They don't appreciate weakness but tend to exploit it.

They have to be laughing their asses off with this lunacy coming from Obama, and Holder. (Just as they did Clinton).

It's funny that you talk shit like that yet the terrorists managed to nearly break this country under BOOOOOOOOOOOSH.

Get over yourself.


We were safe under Booooooooooooooooooooosh for the remainder of his term, the same can't be said for your guy Obama, the recent terrorist attack at Ford Hood where 13 were murdered and another 30+ injured is a primo example.
There were dozens of attacks on American citizens on US soil under Bush they were just reported as crazies and
such, the culprits always claimed jihad as the point the media just ignored it.
 
During the Presidency of Saddam Hussein, the nation of Iraq used, possessed, and made efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMD). .

story.jpg


Scott Ritter

The controversial former chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq says Saddam's weapons of mass destruction are largely disarmed, the "Iraqi threat" is built on a framework of lies and President Bush has betrayed the American people

Da-Duh--Da Duh--& if only Bill Clinton would held Saddam Husien to the UN resolution to keep UN WMD inspectors in Iraq--instead of kicking them out in 1997--we would have never had any need to believe he still possessed them & was trying to acquire more--would we.--:clap2:

To add--BILL CLINTON'S intelligence on Iraq--G.W. Bush inherited. We have Bill Clinton on video recording stating that Saddam was trying to acquire more, & he along with Al Gore & John Kerry--(who was on the senate intelligence committee) also believed the same-:lol::lol:

The ONLY people that benefit from a civilian trial is AL QUEDA. Obama has turned out to be their best friend.
 
Last edited:
During the Presidency of Saddam Hussein, the nation of Iraq used, possessed, and made efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMD). .

story.jpg


Scott Ritter

The controversial former chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq says Saddam's weapons of mass destruction are largely disarmed, the "Iraqi threat" is built on a framework of lies and President Bush has betrayed the American people

Da-Duh--Da Duh--& if only Bill Clinton would held Saddam Husien to the UN resolution to keep UN WMD inspectors in Iraq--instead of kicking them out in 1997--we would have never had any need to believe he still possessed them & was trying to acquire more--would we.--:clap2:

To add--BILL CLINTON'S intelligence on Iraq--G.W. Bush inherited. We have Bill Clinton on video recording stating that Saddam was trying to acquire more, & he along with Al Gore & John Kerry--(who was on the senate intelligence committee) also believed the same-:lol::lol:

The ONLY people that benefit from a civilian trial is AL QUEDA. Obama has turned out to be their best friend.


Mr Dumbass, Sir:

The UN "Inspectors" were CIA Agents:

"Back in 1999, major papers ran front-page investigative stories revealing that the CIA had covertly used U.N. weapons inspectors to spy on Iraq for the U.S.'s own intelligence purposes. "United States officials said today that American spies had worked undercover on teams of United Nations arms inspectors," the New York Times reported (1/7/99). According to the Washington Post (3/2/99), the U.S. "infiltrated agents and espionage equipment for three years into United Nations arms control teams in Iraq to eavesdrop on the Iraqi military without the knowledge of the U.N. agency." Undercover U.S. agents "carried out an ambitious spying operation designed to penetrate Iraq's intelligence apparatus and track the movement of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, according to U.S. and U.N. sources," wrote the Boston Globe (1/6/99). "

.
 
story.jpg


Scott Ritter

The controversial former chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq says Saddam's weapons of mass destruction are largely disarmed, the "Iraqi threat" is built on a framework of lies and President Bush has betrayed the American people

Da-Duh--Da Duh--& if only Bill Clinton would held Saddam Husien to the UN resolution to keep UN WMD inspectors in Iraq--instead of kicking them out in 1997--we would have never had any need to believe he still possessed them & was trying to acquire more--would we.--:clap2:

To add--BILL CLINTON'S intelligence on Iraq--G.W. Bush inherited. We have Bill Clinton on video recording stating that Saddam was trying to acquire more, & he along with Al Gore & John Kerry--(who was on the senate intelligence committee) also believed the same-:lol::lol:

The ONLY people that benefit from a civilian trial is AL QUEDA. Obama has turned out to be their best friend.


Mr Dumbass, Sir:

The UN "Inspectors" were CIA Agents:

"Back in 1999, major papers ran front-page investigative stories revealing that the CIA had covertly used U.N. weapons inspectors to spy on Iraq for the U.S.'s own intelligence purposes. "United States officials said today that American spies had worked undercover on teams of United Nations arms inspectors," the New York Times reported (1/7/99). According to the Washington Post (3/2/99), the U.S. "infiltrated agents and espionage equipment for three years into United Nations arms control teams in Iraq to eavesdrop on the Iraqi military without the knowledge of the U.N. agency." Undercover U.S. agents "carried out an ambitious spying operation designed to penetrate Iraq's intelligence apparatus and track the movement of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, according to U.S. and U.N. sources," wrote the Boston Globe (1/6/99). "

.


:lol::lol::lol: Yeah--it's probably a good idea to "spy" on our sworn enemies--:lol::lol::lol: Remember Bill Clintons & Al Gore's statements--Iraq NEEDS a regime change?--:lol::lol::lol:

If we would have been "spying" on Al Queda--we probably could have prevented 9/11--:cuckoo:: Ups--did I forget to mention that Bill Clinton also had several shots at Osama Bin Laden, but for one reason or another didn't take that shot--even though we had been attacked by this maniac & his coherts on 4 different occassions on Bill Clintons watch.

So all of the above G.W. Bush inherited from the Clinton administration. Yet you left wing--nut case liberals insist on putting ALL of the Blame on BOOOOOSSSSH.---:lol::lol::lol:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top