It had to do with transgender policies that allow boys into girls’ bathrooms. It provides an opportunity for rape, which is what happened.It had NOTHING to do with being a Tranny, zip, zero, zilch.
I personally would have suspended him right then, but there are laws that govern due process, and privacy rights of under age children as well....that the board would have to consider and follow....?
The case was not a cut and dry case of rape initially, when transferred. That's where right wingers made up a bunch of lies, as usual....
I would have probably suspended them both, with rape unknown, in the beginning. They both broke school protocol by making arrangements with each other to meet up for sex, in a specific bathroom at a specific time, when classes were in session.