Kash Patel Undermines His "Big Case" Against Wisconsin Judge

View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.


Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...
She should be disbarred and arrested.
 
He obstructed justice. He lied to federal agents, hid documents and attempted to have video records deleted that showed his crimes.

He was charged and should have been prosecuted just like this judge.

All that shit you made up, and he still got re-elected, you fucking moron.
 
View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.


Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...
How many big cases were there against Trump which went nowhere?
 
That cross-eyed MFer is going to wind spending the rest of his life in prison.

Watch...
 
View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.


Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...
Your source, The Daily Kos, is dubious at best. Got anything less partisan?
 
View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.


Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...
Good!

Let her plead out to a lessor felony, serve a year, minus time served, and be on probation the rest of her life.

She won't wear a black robe again, unless she goes back to school and gets another degree.

You make a point. But one that is pretty lame, considering how Democrats are trying to get her case tossed out by appealing the public.

Her saving grace might be a judge who thinks like she does, but MSNBC won't set her free.
 
Good!

Let her plead out to a lessor felony, serve a year, minus time served, and be on probation the rest of her life.

She won't wear a black robe again, unless she goes back to school and gets another degree.

You make a point. But one that is pretty lame, considering how Democrats are trying to get her case tossed out by appealing the public.

Her saving grace might be a judge who thinks like she does, but MSNBC won't set her free.
Hilarious

The fuckup DOJ does have a case. The arrest was for PR intimidation only.

Then you will choke on your posts from the deep state.
 
View attachment 1105449

For those who might have a genuine concern this judge broke the law, this should infuriate you. Your own team is undermining the case against the judge. It is a prosecutorial axiom that you try the case in court, and not the in public, as Patel is doing. It’s also a prosecutorial axiom that you don’t give the defense any freebie arguments through your own actions, as Patel is doing in this case. If nothing else Patel is giving defense counsel leverage in any plea agreement negotiations. At worst, his repeated flouting of guidelines aimed at protecting a fair trial for defendants risks a sympathetic judge dismissing the case.


Shouldn't be a problem, since Trump is in such good standing with the judiciary...
As if Trump was never tried in the court of public opinion...lol
 
You won't admit to it due to your hack nature.
You are a hack and decided it’s made up solely because it’s too inconvenient to consider the truth.

You made up your mind and will bend reality to conform to it.
 
He obstructed justice. He lied to federal agents, hid documents and attempted to have video records deleted that showed his crimes.

He was charged and should have been prosecuted just like this judge.
A false narrative created by the illegally appointed Jack smith to undermine our democracy and a free and fair election

The American people rejected your lies, it’s why you have a historical low 21 percent approval
 
You are a hack and decided it’s made up solely because it’s too inconvenient to consider the truth.

You made up your mind and will bend reality to conform to it.

Pee wee Herman defense plus standard prog phraseology. The first original thought you have will end the universe.
 
Pee wee Herman defense plus standard prog phraseology. The first original thought you have will end the universe.
What’s your defense? “You won’t admit it” isn’t a defense, it’s an excuse. It’s your argument that you’re failing to make, not my admission.

Deep down, I think you know you’ll sound stupid for defending him.
 
What’s your defense? “You won’t admit it” isn’t a defense, it’s an excuse. It’s your argument that you’re failing to make, not my admission.

Deep down, I think you know you’ll sound stupid for defending him.

Deep down, you have Biden's cock up your ass.
 
Pretty pathetic, Marty. You just get more lame.

And you add zero to the conversation in every single thread you post in.

Where's your curried goathead persona? Got tired of advocating for perverts?
 
Back
Top Bottom