Kash Patel is using polygraph test to find FBI leakers — NYT is (definitely) not pleased.

[DonGlock26]

There is nothing illegal about FBI agents leaking unethical conduct to the press, MAGA imbecile.

Not sure why your Nazi ass thinks this is a good thing.

Let a grand jury decide.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Let a grand jury decide.

You do realize that no laws matter anymore, right Nazi? After the traitor Trump freed all the Jan 6 criminals.

Laws don't mean a ******* thing anymore.

That's the price society pays for having a deranged, corrupt fuckwad like Trump as president.

 

[scruffy]

This told me the GOP is dead. Dead, dead, dead.

And yet they won the Presidency and both houses of Congress.

Go figure.

 

[DonGlock26]

You do realize that no laws matter anymore, right Nazi? After the traitor Trump freed all the Jan 6 criminals.

Laws don't mean a ******* thing anymore.

That's the price society pays for having a deranged, corrupt fuckwad like Trump as president.

 

[d0gbreath]

Psychopaths can lie and pass them all day long. People suffering from high anxiety can't pass one telling the truth.

 

[Muhammed]

Someone should polygraph Kash about Epstein.

Just the look on his face when asked about Epstein makes me distrust him.

 

[Jarlaxle]

The evidence required to convict someone of a crime is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Additionally, a polygraph cannot be compelled in a criminal case.

However, employment is a mutual agreement and the standard of proof to dismiss is much lower. A polygraph fail, or even a refusal to take a polygraph is established grounds for dismissal in jobs requiring security clearances.

Which does not change the fact that a polygraph is about as reliable as cartomancy, a Ouija board, or a magic 8 ball.

If FBI personnel are innocent, they have nothing to worry about.

You know less than nothing.

 

[fncceo]

Which does not change the fact that a polygraph is about as reliable as cartomancy, a Ouija board, or a magic 8 ball.

Which is why I prefer phrenology as it is an established science.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Polygraphs are unscientific mumbo-jumbo, hence why you can’t use the results in court.

Not a totally true statement on your part.

Which is an improvement for you.

Usually you lie your ass off.

Whether a polygraph test is admissible in court will depend on the jurisdiction. For instance, polygraph admissibility by state varies widely. However, they can generally be divided into two main categories: states that find the results of the test entirely inadmissible, and those that allow them in court, but only if it is submitted with stipulations from the parties. In other words, the latter category requires that both the suspect and prosecutor must agree to admit the results.

Are Polygraphs Admissible in Civil Court?

Find out if polygraph tests can be used as evidence. Explore their admissibility and legal limits. Get expert legal guidance with LegalMatch!

www.legalmatch.com

 

[konradv]

Not a totally true statement on your part.

Which is an improvement for you.

Usually you lie your ass off.

Whether a polygraph test is admissible in court will depend on the jurisdiction. For instance, polygraph admissibility by state varies widely. However, they can generally be divided into two main categories: states that find the results of the test entirely inadmissible, and those that allow them in court, but only if it is submitted with stipulations from the parties. In other words, the latter category requires that both the suspect and prosecutor must agree to admit the results.

Are Polygraphs Admissible in Civil Court?

Find out if polygraph tests can be used as evidence. Explore their admissibility and legal limits. Get expert legal guidance with LegalMatch!

www.legalmatch.com

I wonder why both sides have to agree? Seems like there’s a lot up in the air when it comes to polygraphs. People should refuse and sue, if there are any repercussions.

 

[the watcher]

We're a nation that is at war with itself. The FBY is only one of many departments that are bipolar now, loyalty is questioned but the question should be loyal to who? We are in a transitional situation right now, like a mental patient that knows deep down we're fukked up but can't decide which voice to listen to. The Dept of State, all the spooks, the pentagon, Congress and the Court, the Feral Reserve, education, etc have used up what little credibility they ever had and are running on pure force and deception now. It will take a huge necessary "event" to create the much needed 'bring us together' moment we need to continue our pseudo existence.

 

[HikerGuy83]

I wonder why both sides have to agree? Seems like there’s a lot up in the air when it comes to polygraphs. People should refuse and sue, if there are any repercussions.

Point being your statement was half false.

Own it

 

[konradv]

Point being your statement was half false.

That also means half true, therefore beating out MAGA most of the time.

 

[multivita-man]

Psychopaths can lie and pass them all day long. People suffering from high anxiety can't pass one telling the truth.

It all depends on the examiner.

Polygraphs - at least the ones they use now and have used since the 1950s - can detect biological responses that indicate stress. But stress doesn't mean you're lying; it just means you're stressed. Maybe you're afraid of judgment. Maybe you're over-thinking and worried you're showing signs of stress. Maybe the examiner's a total ********** who's trying to get a response out of you to see how you'll handle additional questioning in response to a 'deceptive' answer.

There's technology that's being developed now that may very well be able to detect deception with greater accuracy, but it's still very much in the prototype stage and probably 10 years down the pike at least.